Cited by 85Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsBehavioral Health and InterventionsHuman Behavior and Motivation

Where Do Self-Concordant Goals Come From? The Role of Domain-Specific Psychological Need Satisfaction

Milyavskaya, Marina, Nadolny, Daniel, Koestner, Richard·2014·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Previous research has shown that self-concordant goals are more likely to be attained. But what leads someone to adopt a self-concordant goal in the first place? The present research addresses this question by looking at the domains in which goals are set, focusing on the amount of psychological need satisfaction experienced in these domains. Across three experimental studies, we demonstrate that domain-related need satisfaction predicts the extent to which people adopt self-concordant goals in a given domain, laying the foundation for successful goal pursuit. In addition, we show that need satisfaction influences goal self-concordance because in need-satisfying domains people are both more likely to choose the most self-concordant goal (among a set of comparable choices), and are more likely to internalize the possible goals. The implications of this research for goal setting and pursuit as well as for the importance of examining goals within their broader motivational framework are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167214524445

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [26]26. Milyavskaya, M., Philippe, F., & Koestner, R. (2013). Psychological need satisfaction across levels of experience: The contribu- tion of specific-level need satisfaction to general well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 41-51.
  2. [45]45. Smith, A. L., Ntoumanis, N., & Duda, J. L. (2007). Goal striv- ing, goal attainment, and well-being: An adaptation of the self-concordance model in sport. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 763-782.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milyavskaya, M., Nadolny, D., & Koestner, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2014-03-13
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
700-711
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2138561988
Cited by
85
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
10.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
Keywords
goal setting, psychological need satisfaction, goal pursuit, goal internalization, goal choice, self-determination theory, motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review