The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Growth in reading skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds: Findings from a 5-year longitudinal study.
Abstract
This article reports on the results of a longitudinal investigation of the reading development of a sample of 824 children (406 girls, 418 boys). The sample included 689 native English-speaking (L1) children and 135 English-language learners (ELLs) representing 33 different native languages. In kindergarten and 4th grade, children's word reading, spelling, phonological processing, syntactic awareness, and working memory skills were assessed with standardized and experimental measures. In addition, word reading was assessed from kindergarten through 4th grade, and reading comprehension in 4th grade. Comparisons of reading skills between the ELLs and the L1 speakers demonstrated that despite slightly lower performance of the ELLs on several kindergarten tasks, differences at 4th grade were negligible. Fourth-grade word reading was predicted by the same kindergarten tasks for both language groups, and prediction of reading comprehension differed by only 1 task. Finally, the trajectory of word reading was nonlinear for both groups, although predictors of this trajectory differed between groups. The findings suggest that early identification models established through research with L1 speakers are appropriate for identifying ELLs at risk for reading difficulties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance
Meredith, W. (1993) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294825 · Cited by 4,536
The Development of Working Memory in Normally Achieving and Subtypes of Learning Disabled Children
Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1989) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131037 · Cited by 842
Self-citationCross-language transfer of phonological awareness.
Durgunoğlu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.453 · Cited by 772
Reading, syntactic, and working memory skills of bilingual Portuguese-English Canadian children
Da Fontoura, H. A., & Siegel, L. S. (1995) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/bf01026951 · Cited by 234
Self-citationBackground Knowledge, Linguistic Complexity, and Second-Language Reading Comprehension
Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (1998) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1080/10862969809547998 · Cited by 138
Cited by
Melby-Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0033890 · Cited by 363
Ramirez, G., Chen, X., Geva, E., & Kiefer, H. (2010) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9 · Cited by 249
Pears, K. C., Fisher, P. A., Bruce, J., Kim, H. K., & Yoerger, K. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01491.x · Cited by 146
Literacy coaching to improve student reading achievement: A multi-level mediation model
Matsumura, L. C., Garnier, H. E., & Spybrook, J. (2013) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.001 · Cited by 106
Kim, Y.-S. G., & Piper, B. (2019) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9889-7 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Lesaux, N. K., Rupp, A. A., & Siegel, L. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 821-834
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W1963508308
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.