Effects of "voice" and peer opinions on responses to inequity.

Abstract

Southern Methodist UniversityTwo experiments investigated the effects of (participating in allocationdecision making by expressing one's own opinion about the preferred alloca-tion) on responses to an inequitable allocation. In addition to subjects' (femalecollege students) either having or not having voice, Experiment 1 manipulated(a) whether the allocation made by a maker (supposedly anothersubject but actually the experimenter) was or was not biased (due to self-interest) and (b) whether the subject did or did not learn that a co-workerbelieved the allocation to be inequitable. Experiment 2 (with female high schoolstudents) manipulated the presence or absence of voice and involved only aself-interested decision maker; also, a note from a co-worker either supportedthe decision maker's allocation or confirmed the subject's opinion that the allo-cation was inequitable. In both experiments, the impact of voice was mediatedby knowledge about the co-worker's opinion. When subjects had no knowledgeof the co-worker's opinion (Experiment 1) or knew that the co-worker's opinioncoincided with the decision maker's allocation (Experiment 2), there was evi-dence for a process effect: Voice subjects expressed greater satisfactionthan those with no voice.How do people know that they have beentreated fairly? According to equity theory(Adams, 1965; Walster, Berscheid, & Wal-ster, 1973), a distribution of outcomes is con-sidered fair (equitable) if the ratio of out-comes to inputs is constant across people.Apart from considerations of equity, however,fairness judgments may also be affected bywhether a distribution is the result of an ac-ceptable decision-making procedure (see thedistinction between distributive and proce-dural justice in Folger, 1977; Leventhal,1976; and Thibaut & Walker, 1975). Deutsch(1975), in discussing how injustice of deci-sion-making procedures affects the percep-tion of justice, makes the following argument:There is much social psychological research

Cites (14)

1. Inequity In Social Exchange
   Adams, J. Stacy · 1965 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
2. Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created “Social Climates”
   Lewin, Kurt, Lippitt, Ronald, White, Ralph K. · 1939 · The Journal of Social Psychology
3. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis
   John W. Thibaut, Laurens Walker · 1975 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
4. Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice?
   Deutsch, Morton · 1975 · Journal of Social Issues
5. New directions in equity research.
   Walster, Elaine, Berscheid, Ellen, Walster, G. William · 1973 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
6. Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance.
   Leavitt, Harold J. · 1951 · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
7. Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity.
   Folger, Robert · 1977 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
8. Preference for modes of dispute resolution as a function of process and decision control
   Houlden, Pauline, LaTour, Stephen, Walker, Laurens, Thibaut, John · 1978 · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
9. Procedural Justice as Fairness
   Thibaut, John, Walker, Laurens, LaTour, Stephen, Houlden, Pauline · 1974 · Stanford Law Review
10. Sex, age, and equity behavior.
    Gerald S. Leventhal, Douglas Warren Lane · 1970 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 14 references

Cited by (24)

1. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
   Colquitt, Jason A., Conlon, Donald E., Wesson, Michael J., Porter, Christopher O. L. H., Ng, K. Yee · 2001 · Journal of Applied Psychology
2. A Relational Model of Authority in Groups
   Tyler, Tom R., Lind, E. Allan · 1992 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
3. Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice
   Cropanzano, Russell, Byrne, Zinta S., Bobocel, D.Ramona, Rupp, Deborah E. · 2001 · Journal of Vocational Behavior
4. Managing Organizational Legitimacy in the California Cattle Industry: The Construction and Effectiveness of Verbal Accounts
   Elsbach, Kimberly D. · 1994 · Administrative Science Quarterly
5. An Empirical Investigation of Customer Satisfaction after Service Failure and Recovery
   McCollough, Michael A., Berry, Leonard L., Yadav, Manjit S. · 2000 · Journal of Service Research

See all 332