Cited by 2,977Psychology of Social InfluenceSocial Power and Status DynamicsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

A Relational Model of Authority in Groups

Tyler, Tom R., Lind, E. Allan·1992·Advances in Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60283-x

Cites

138 of 138 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To provide reasons for decisions signals that the decision-makers respect and care about the affected and may lead to more favorable interpretations regarding the motives and intentions of the decision-makers.

    “To provide reasons for decisions signals that the decision-makers respect and care about the affected (e.g., Tyler and Lind 1992) and may lead to more favorable interpretations regarding the motives and intentions of the decision-makers (e.g., Bies and Shapiro 1988;Shapiro et al. 1994;Colquitt 2001;Shaw et al. 2003).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 139 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • American Bar Foundation (US)
Venue
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1992
Pages
115-191
ISSN
0065-2601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1852090069
Cited by
2,977
References
139
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 112 · 2018: 152 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 129 · 2015: 143 · 2014: 131 · 2013: 128 · 2012: 130
FWCI
207.27
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in experimental social psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
authority, obedience, legitimate power, reward power, coercive power, group decision making, leadership effectiveness, perceived expertise, compliance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review