Cited by 1,288Place Attachment and Urban StudiesColor perception and designFacilities and Workplace Management

A description of the affective quality attributed to environments.

Russell, James A., Pratt, Geraldine·1980·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The meaning that persons attribute to environments is divided into perceptualcognitive meaning and affective meaning. Affective meaning is then conceptualized as a two-dimensional bipolar space that can be denned by eight variables falling in the following circular order around the perimeter: pleasant (arbitrarily set at 0°), exciting (45°), arousing (90°), distressing (135°), unpleasant (180°), gloomy (225°), sleepy (270°), and relaxing (315°, which is thus 45° from pleasant). Alternatively, the same space can be denned by two orthogonal bipolar dimensions of pleasant-unpl easant and arousing-sleepy—or equally well by exciting-gloomy and distressing-relaxing. Reliable verbal scales for these eight variables are developed and shown to approximate the proposed theoretical structure. Most of us would acknowledge the pervasive if subtle influence of affective responses on person-environment interactions. The English language provides hundreds of words, such as lively, boring, disgusting, and relaxing, that persons use to describe the affective quality of places. In spite of, or perhaps because of, this large array of affective descriptors, environmental psychologists have focused their attention on only a few and then only one at a time (such as degree of comfort, annoyance, pleasantness, or psychological stress), implicitly expressing pessimism about the possibility of including in their research or theorizing anything approaching a complete description and assessment of the af…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.311

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russell, J. A., & Pratt, G.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1980-02
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
311-322
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2087810295
Cited by
1,288
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 48
FWCI
29.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Place Attachment and Urban Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Color perception and design
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Facilities and Workplace Management
Keywords
person-environment interaction, bipolar scales, pleasantness, arousal, environmental psychology, verbal rating scale, affective meaning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review