Cited by 1,376Usability and User Interface DesignInnovative Human-Technology InteractionAesthetic Perception and Analysis

What is beautiful is usable

Tractinsky, N, Katz, A.S, Ikar, D·2000·Interacting with Computers

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to test the relationships between users ' perceptions of a computer-ized system's beauty and usability. The experiment used a computerized application as a surrogate for an Automated Teller Machine (ATM). Perceptions were elicited before and after the participants used the system. Pre-experimental measures indicate strong correlations between system's perceived aesthetics and perceived usability. Post-experimental measures indicated that the strong correlation remained intact. A multivariate analysis of covariance revealed that the degree of system's aesthetics affected the post-use perceptions of both aesthetics and usability, whereas the degree of actual usability had no such effect. The results resemble those found by social psychologists regarding the effect of physical attractiveness on the valuation of other personality attributes. The ®ndings stress the importance of studying the aesthetic aspect of human±computer interaction (HCI) design

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0953-5438(00)00031-x

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D.
Affiliations
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Venue
Interacting with Computers
Published
2000-12
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
127-145
ISSN
0953-5438 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998515403
Cited by
1,376
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 72
FWCI
14.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Interacting with Computers (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Keywords
aesthetic perception, usability, user perception, human-computer interaction design, automated teller machines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review