Cited by 280Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social identification effects in group polarization.

Mackie, Diane M.·1986·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.720

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.720

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005 · Cited by 12,701
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
Social Identity and Intergroup Relations.
Glassner, B., & Tajfel, H. (1985) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2069233 · Cited by 3,232
Processes of Opinion Change
Kelman, H. C. (1961) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266996 · Cited by 2,181
Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour
Turner, J. C. (1975) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420050102 · Cited by 1,434
Cognitive Responses in Persuasion
Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315803012 · Cited by 1,223
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment-Involvement Approach
Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. E. (1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 644
QUANTITATIVE JUDGEMENT IN SOCIAL PERCEPTION*
Tajfel, H. (1959) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1959.tb00677.x · Cited by 370

Show all 29 references

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 280

Group polarization and choice‐dilemmas: how important is self‐categorization?
Križan, Z., & Baron, R. S. (2006) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.345 · Cited by 38
Interaction in Small Groups
Burke, P. J. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-36921-x_15 · Cited by 35
Relationship Conflict Improves Team Performance Assessment Accuracy: Evidence From a Multilevel Study
Breugst, N., Patzelt, H., Shepherd, D. A., & Aguinis, H. (2012) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2011.0032 · Cited by 40
Subtyping and social consensus: the role of the audience in the maintenance of stereotypic beliefs
Carnaghi, A., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2006) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.402 · Cited by 34
Information Exchange in Context: Effects of Gender Composition of Group, Accountability, and Intergroup Perception on Group Decision Making1
Hiel, A. V., & Schittekatte, M. (1998) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01360.x · Cited by 34
Power-law in pedestrian crossing flow under the interference of vehicles at an un-signalized midblock crosswalk
Xin, X., Jia, N., Zheng, L., & Ma, S. (2014) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2014.03.068 · Cited by 32
The Perception of Teamwork With an Autonomous Agent Enhances Affect and Performance Outcomes
Walliser, J. C., Mead, P. R., & Shaw, T. H. (2017) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931213601541 · Cited by 38
Polarization in groups of Bayesian agents
Pallavicini, J. L., Hallsson, B. G., & Kappel, K. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-01978-w · Cited by 41
Discrimination between dominant and subordinate groups: The positive–negative asymmetry effect and normative processes
Amiot, C. E., & Bourhis, R. Y. (2005) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466604x17605 · Cited by 32
Seeing Red: Anger Increases How Much Republican Identification Predicts Partisan Attitudes and Perceived Polarization
Huber, M., Van Boven, L., Park, B., & Pizzi, W. T. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139193 · Cited by 31
The strategic role of language abstraction in achieving symbolic and practical goals
Rubini, M., Menegatti, M., & Moscatelli, S. (2014) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2014.985501 · Cited by 34
Efeitos da comunidade de origem no participante de comunidades virtuais de marca
de Almeida, S. O., Mazzon, J. A., Neto, H. F. M., & Dholakia, U. M. (2012) · Revista de Administração de Empresas · doi:10.1590/s0034-75902012000200007 · Cited by 30
Dissensions et consensus
Moscovici, S., & Doise, W. (2010) · doi:10.1522/030148955 · Cited by 33
Social psychology of Making Poverty History: Motivating anti-poverty action in Australia
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2010) · Australian Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00050060903447095 · Cited by 29
Social Information Processing and Group-Induced Shifts in Responses to Task Design
Bateman, T. S., Griffin, R. W., & Rubinstein, D. (1987) · Group & Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/105960118701200107 · Cited by 29
Social Influence in an Intergroup Context
Mackie, D. M., & Wright, C. L. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470693421.ch14 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Nice and Nasty: The Formation of Prosocial and Hostile Social Movements
Thomas, E. F., Smith, L. G. E., McGarty, C., & Postmes, T. (2010) · Murdoch University Research Portal · Cited by 28
Group attribution errors and the illusion of group attitude change
Mackie, D. M., & Allison, S. T. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(87)90016-3 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
The effect of computer‐mediated communication on conformity vs. nonconformity: An impression management perspective
Schlosser, A. E. (2009) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.03.005 · Cited by 27
Commitment to the Team
McLaughlin, B. (2016) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000176 · Cited by 35
One of Us: On the Role of Accent and Race in Real-Time In-Group Categorization
Paladino, M. P., & Mazzurega, M. (2019) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x19884090 · Cited by 25
Individuals in Movements
van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2007) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70960-4_5 · Cited by 25
How supervisors set the tone for long hours: Vicarious learning, subordinates' self-motives and the contagion of working hours
Afota, M., Ollier‐Malaterre, A., & Vandenberghe, C. (2018) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.11.001 · Cited by 24
Heart to Heart
Parkinson, B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108696234 · Cited by 32
How Ambient Cues Facilitate Political Segregation
Motyl, M. S., Prims, J., & Iyer, R. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219875141 · Cited by 23
Social categorization and attitude change
van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1988) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180503 · Cited by 23
The Effects of Intragroup Interaction and Cohesion on Intergroup Bias
Petersen, L., Dietz, J., & Frey, D. (2004) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430204041397 · Cited by 23
Support for environmentally-friendly airports influenced by political affiliation and social identity
Milner, M. N., Rice, S. C., & Rice, C. (2019) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101185 · Cited by 27
Identity, Beliefs, and Political ConflictPreprint
Gennaioli, N., & Tabellini, G. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3300726 · Cited by 23
Group Polarization Revisited: A Processing Effort Account
Sieber, J., & Ziegler, R. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219833389 · Cited by 21
Comparison of Allocations by Individuals and Interacting Groups in an Escalation of Commitment Situation1
Seibert, S. E., & Goltz, S. M. (2001) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02486.x · Cited by 21
A voice inside my head: The psychological and behavioral consequences of auditory technologies
Lieberman, A., Schroeder, J., & Amir, O. (2022) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104133 · Cited by 20
The Influence of Social Consensus Information on Intergroup Attitudes: The Moderating Effects of Ingroup Identification
Sechrist, G. B., & Young, A. F. (2011) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2010.522615 · Cited by 20
When Descriptive Norms Backfire: Attitudes Induce Undesirable Consequences during Disaster Preparation
Ozaki, T., & Nakayachi, K. (2020) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12195 · Cited by 22
Personality Assessment and Psychotherapy Preferences: Congruence between Client Personality and Therapist Personality Preferences
Anestis, J. C., Rodriguez, T. R., Preston, O. C., Harrop, T. M., Arnau, R. C., & Finn, J. A. (2020) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2020.1757459 · Cited by 19
Party over pandemic: Polarized trust in political leaders and experts explains public support for COVID-19 policies
Cole, J. C., Flores, A., Jiga‐Boy, G. M., Klein, O., Sherman, D. K., & Leaf Van Boven, A. (2022) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302221118534 · Cited by 19
Marriage and Family Therapy in NPD Teams: Effects of We‐ness on Knowledge Sharing and Product Performance
Markham, S. K., & Lee, H. (2014) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12184 · Cited by 19
IT managers’ vs. IT auditors’ perceptions of risks: An actor–observer asymmetry perspective
Nuijten, A. L. P., Keil, M., van der Pijl, G., & Commandeur, H. R. (2017) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2017.04.002 · Cited by 22
Group polarisation among location-based game players: an analysis of use and attitudes towards game slang
Laato, S., Inaba, N., Paloheimo, M., & Laajala, T. D. (2021) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-03-2020-0158 · Cited by 18
Political polarization: Radicalism and immune beliefs
Almagro, M. (2022) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/01914537211066859 · Cited by 21
‘Get out of my fandom, newbie’: A cross-fandom study of elitism and gatekeeping in fans
Plante, C., Reysen, S., Chadborn, D., Roberts, S. E., & Gerbasi, K. C. (2020) · The Journal of Fandom Studies · doi:10.1386/jfs_00013_1 · Cited by 14
Birds of a feather: Leader-follower similarity and procedural fairness effects on cooperation
Cornelis, I., Hiel, A. V., & Cremer, D. D. (2010) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594321003630055 · Cited by 20
Effects of Group Membership on Perception of Risk for Aids
Campbell, L. F., & Stewart, A. E. (1992) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1992.70.3c.1075 · Cited by 18
Digital technologies-enhanced older adults health management: developing a five-dimensional extension of social learning theory for community settings
Liu, T., Luo, Y. T., & Pang, P. C. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1627983 · Cited by 19
The Dark Side of Morality: Group Polarization and Moral Epistemology
Arvan, M. (2019) · The Philosophical Forum · doi:10.1111/phil.12213 · Cited by 19
“To hope was to expect”: The impact of perspective taking and forecast type on wishful thinking
Rose, J. P., & Aspiras, O. G. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2170 · Cited by 17
Can Group-and Issue-Related Factors Predict Choice Shift?
BarNir, A. (1998) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496498293002 · Cited by 17
Group polarization calls for group-level brain communication
Hou, Y., Zhang, D., Gan, X., & Hu, Y. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119739 · Cited by 17
A cultural theory of the culture wars
Swedlow, B., RIPBERGER, J. T., & Yuan, M. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12968 · Cited by 18
Exit, Loyalty, and Collective Action Among Workers in a Simulated Business Environment: Interactive Effects of Group Identification and Boundary Permeability
Blair, I. V., & Jost, J. T. (2003) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1024271019738 · Cited by 16
The effects of anonymity on computer-mediated communication: The case of independent versus interdependent self-construal influence
Bae, M. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.026 · Cited by 17
Social consensus and the encoding of consistent and inconsistent information: when one's future audience orients information processing
Carnaghi, A., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2006) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.265 · Cited by 16
Dodging the autocratic bullet: enlisting behavioural science to arrest democratic backsliding
Abels, C. M., Huttunen, K. J. A., Hertwig, R., & Lewandowsky, S. (2024) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2024.43 · Cited by 17
A Self-Categorization Explanation for Opinion Consensus Perceptions
Zhang, J., & Reid, S. A. (2013) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/hcre.12004 · Cited by 15
IS BIASED PROCESSING OF STRONG ATTITUDES PERIPHERAL? AN EXTENSION OF THE DUAL PROCESS MODELS OF ATTITUDE CHANGE
Na, E.-Y. (1999) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1999.85.2.589 · Cited by 15
Social Identity in Human-Agent Interaction: A Primer
Seaborn, K. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3760500 · Cited by 17
Assessing perceived value: moderating effects of susceptibility to brand prestige and susceptibility to normative influence
Joe, S.-W., Tsai, Y.-H., Lin, C., Ma, H.-C., & Chiu, C. (2016) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-016-0203-2 · Cited by 14
Focus of attention and locus of control as moderators of fraternal justice effects
James, K. E., & Cropanzano, R. (1990) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/bf01048396 · Cited by 15
Elite Cues, News Coverage, and Partisan Support for Compromise
McLaughlin, B., McLeod, D. M., Davis, C. R., Perryman, M. R., & Mun, K. (2016) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699016655755 · Cited by 15
Category-based vs. Person-based Perception in Intergroup Contexts
Brewer, M. B. (1998) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779843000054 · Cited by 13
Media-Induced Misperception Further Divides Public Opinion
Han, J., & Yzer, M. C. (2019) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000259 · Cited by 17
La lógica de la acción colectiva: tres modelos de análisis de la participación política no institucional
Valencia, J. (1990) · International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social · doi:10.1080/02134748.1990.10821626 · Cited by 11
Attitude Extremity and Party Identification Strength on Perceived Polarization
Matsuno, E. G. (2013) · CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder) · Cited by 11
Event triggers and opinion leaders shape climate change discourse on Weibo
Yang, J., Hu, Y., Liu, M., Li, Y., Ma, Z., Fang, W., & Bi, J. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02124-4 · Cited by 12
Looking for B = f (P, E): The exception still forms the rule
Sorrentino, R. M. (2013) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-013-9345-6 · Cited by 11
Teaching (Something About) Terrorism: Ethical and Methodological Problems, Pedagogical Suggestions
Dexter, H., & Guittet, E.-P. (2012) · International Studies Perspectives · doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2012.00507.x · Cited by 10
Technology and virtual teams: using globally distributed groups in MBA learning
Rockett, L., Valor, J., Miller, P., & Naudé, P. (1998) · Campus-Wide Information Systems · doi:10.1108/10650749810248311 · Cited by 10
Mobilization to Achieve Collective Action and Democratic Majority/Plurality Amplification
Rosenwein, R., & Campbell, D. (1992) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb00888.x · Cited by 11
Who’s in Charge Here? The Team Leadership Implications of Authority Structure
Day, D. V., Wageman, R., & Fisher, C. M. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199755615.013.022 · Cited by 10
Testing the group polarization hypothesis by using logit models
Rodrigo, M. F., & Ato, M. (2001) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.86 · Cited by 9
Group influences upon preferences for personal protection: A simulation study
Bradley, G. L. (1995) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/0022-4375(95)00009-f · Cited by 9
Social Cognition and Cultivation
Shrum, L. J. (2009) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203936313-15 · Cited by 9
Intergroup Relations
Hogg, M. A. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-36921-x_19 · Cited by 9
Is There Negative Social Influence? Disentangling Effects of Dissimilarity and Disliking on Opinion ShiftsPreprint
Takkcs, K., Flache, A., & Mäs, M. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2445649 · Cited by 9
What’s the Norm Around Here? Individuals’ Responses Can Mitigate the Effects of Misinformation Prevalence in Shaping Perceptions of a Community
Aghajari, Z., Baumer, E. P. S., & DiFranzo, D. J. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580946 · Cited by 9
Center for Effective Organizations
Publication, C., & Mohrman, S. A. (2007) · Cited by 9
Testing the waters: An investigation of the impact of hot tubbing on experts from referral through testimony.
Perillo, J. T., Perillo, A. D., Despodova, N. M., & Kovera, M. B. (2021) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000446 · Cited by 10
Majority/minority size and the evaluations of persuasive arguments
Garlick, R., & Mongeau, P. A. (1992) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824099209359896 · Cited by 8
Political Polarization Projection: Social Projection of Attitude Extremity and Attitudinal ProcessesPreprint
Leaf Van Boven, A., Judd, C. M., & Sherman, D. K. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 8
Team work engagement: Considering team dynamics for engagementPreprint
Costa, P., Passos, A., & Bakker, A. B. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 8
Group Information Behavioural Norms and the Effective Use of a Collaborative Information System: A Case Study
Furness, C. D. (2011) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 8
Morris Fiorina’s Foundational Contributions to the Study of Partisanship and Mass Polarization
Levendusky, M. S. (2017) · The Forum · doi:10.1515/for-2017-0011 · Cited by 9
Exploring Prototypicality Adherence Effects on User Engagement in User-Generated Video Platforms
Liu, L., Sun, X., Fang, J., & Hossin, M. A. (2024) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2024.2361400 · Cited by 7
How Smoking Advocates are Connected Online: An Examination of Online Social Relationships Supporting Smoking Behaviors
Park, M. (2019) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2019.1709924 · Cited by 7
The dynamics of polarization and compromise in conflict situations: The interaction between cultural traits and majority–minority influence
Kim, J.-H., & Kim, J. (2015) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1075655 · Cited by 8
Angewandte Sozialpsychologie
Jonas, K. W., & Lebherz, C. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71633-4_15 · Cited by 7
FACULDADE DE ECONOMIA, ADMINISTRAÇÃO E CONTABILIDADE DEPARTAMENTO DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ADMINISTRAÇÃO OS EFEITOS DA PARTICIPAÇÃO EM COMUNIDADES VIRTUAIS DE MARCA NO COMPORTAMENTO DO CONSUMIDOR: UM ESTUDO COMPARATIVO ENTRE COMUNIDADES GERENCIADAS PELAS ORGANIZAÇÕES E PELOS CONSUMIDORES
de Almeida, S. O., & Paulo, S. (2009) · Cited by 6
Joint consumption challenges in groups
Marchand, A. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-06-2014-1001 · Cited by 6
The effect of political affiliation on support for police drone monitoring in the United States
Milner, M. N., Rice, S. C., Winter, S. R., & Anania, E. C. (2019) · Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems · doi:10.1139/juvs-2018-0026 · Cited by 6
Partisan winds: Group-level polarization and issue-framing propel attitudes about local wind farms
Marcos, A., Hartmann, P., Bessette, D., & Árvai, J. (2024) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103848 · Cited by 7
The diversity puzzle
Mäs, M. (2010) · Cited by 5
Internal Auditors’ Perceptions of Information Technology-Related Risks: A Comparison Between General Auditors and Information Technology Auditors
Nuijten, A. L. P., Keil, M., & Zwiers, B. (2022) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-2020-040 · Cited by 7
Social Referencing in Adults and Children: Extending Social Appraisal Approaches
Parkinson, B. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32968-6_7 · Cited by 5
Shared Cognitions and Shared Theories: Telling More Than We Can Know by Ourselves?
Randolph-Seng, B., de Calvo, M. P. C., Zacchilli, T. L., & Cottle, J. L. (2010) · Cited by 5
Decision-making in a corporate boardroom: Inside the black box
Martyn, K. (2006) · Massey Research Online (Massey University) · Cited by 5
Under the Influence: How Viewing Extreme Partying and Drinking on Social Media Shapes Group Perceptions
Davis, J., Desmarais, S., & Giguère, B. (2023) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2023.2219384 · Cited by 4
To Share or Not to Share: Understanding and Modeling Individual Disclosure Preferences in Recommender Systems for the Workplace
Musick, G., Duan, W., Najafian, S., Sengupta, S., Flathmann, C., Knijnenburg, B. P., & McNeese, N. J. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3633074 · Cited by 4
Deglobalization Trends and Communication Variables: A Multifaceted Analysis from 2009 to 2023
Danowski, J. A., & Park, H. W. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16050403 · Cited by 4
Group Affiliations, Opinion Polarization, and Global Organizations: Views of the World Trade Organization Before and After Seattle
Bullock, C. F., McCluskey, M., Stamm, K. R., Tanaka, K., Torres, M., & Scott, C. (2002) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0504_04 · Cited by 4
EFFECTS OF RESPONSIBILITY AND COHESIVENESS ON GROUP ESCALATION DECISIONS
Liao, W. M., Finley, D. R., & Shafer, W. E. (2004) · Advances in management accounting · doi:10.1016/s1474-7871(04)13010-4 · Cited by 4

Authors: Mackie, D. M.
Affiliations: University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author: Mackie, Diane M.
ORCID: Mackie, Diane M.
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1986-04
Volume: 50
Issue: 4
Pages: 720-728
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.720
OpenAlex: W2006391533
Cited by: 280
References: 29
Citations by year: 2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI: 18.66
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Keywords: group polarization, social identification, group identity, group decision making, social influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Social identification effects in group polarization.

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks