The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A growing number of empirical studies have uncovered evidence that people update their political attitudes and beliefs in line with evidence and arguments presented to them.
“Consistent with this view, a growing number of empirical studies have uncovered evidence that people update their political attitudes and beliefs in line with evidence (e.g., refs. 4,13,27–29) and arguments23,30,31 presented to them.”
From Factual knowledge can reduce attitude polarization (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Since these perceptions are manipulable, they likely could be inaccurate and undermine efficacy.
“Since these perceptions are manipulable, they likely could be inaccurate and undermine efficacy (see Bolsen et al., 2014).”
From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Bolsen et al., 2014
Directional goals seem prevalent in many political contexts.
“While debate continues about the extent to which directional goals manifest (e.g., Druckman, 2012;Druckman & McGrath, 2019;Guess & Coppock, 2020), they seem prevalent in many political contexts (Bolsen et al., 2014;Groenendyk, 2013;Groenendyk & Krupnikov, 2021;Lavine et al., 2012;Leeper & Slothuus, 2014;Lodge & Taber, 2013).”
From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Bolsen et al., 2014
Introducing uncertainty leads citizens to dismiss evidence regarding emerging technologies, nuclear energy, and climate change.
“For instance, introducing uncertainty leads citizens to dismiss evidence regarding emerging technologies, nuclear energy, and climate change (Bolsen et al., 2014;Bolsen & Druckman, 2015, 2018).”
From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Bolsen et al., 2014
Partisan-motivated reasoning decreases the relative weight of substantive arguments vis-à-vis partisan cues in citizens' political opinion formation.
“Partisanmotivated reasoning undermines decisionmaking as it decreases the relative weight of substantive arguments visávis partisan cues in citizens' political opinion formation (Bolsen et al., 2014;Druckman et al., 2013)”
From Political polarization and corruption: A theoretical and empirical review (2024) · cites this paper as Bolsen et al., 2014
Processes such as self-categorization, in-group favouritism and out-group derogation contribute to political polarization by encouraging partisans to engage in various forms of motivated reasoning on behalf of their political party or ideological group.
“Processes such as self-categorization, in-group favouritism and out-group derogation contribute to political polarization by encouraging partisans to engage in various forms of motivated reasoning — including selective information exposure or avoidance and confirmation or disconfirmation biases — on behalf of their political party or ideological group3,39,91,94,141–144.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [141]
When the same political elites are described as less divergent, participants exhibit more overlap in their own policy opinions.
“when the same political elites are described as less divergent, participants exhibit more overlap in their own policy opinions141.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [141]
Cites
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022 · see citing works
Eulau, H. H. F. (1960) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952653 · Cited by 4,749 · see citing works
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x · Cited by 4,344 · see citing works
The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,317 · see citing works
An economic theory of political action in a democracy
Downs, A. (1957) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/257897 · Cited by 3,300 · see citing works
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038 · Cited by 2,748 · see citing works
Accounting for the effects of accountability.
Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255 · Cited by 2,383 · see citing works
How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation
DRUCKMAN, J. N., PETERSON, E., & SLOTHUUS, R. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000500 · Cited by 1,569 · see citing works
Self-citationParty Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.
Cohen, G. L. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808 · Cited by 1,400 · see citing works
The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence
Druckman, J. (2001) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1015006907312 · Cited by 1,342 · see citing works
Self-citationFraming Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055407070554 · Cited by 1,127 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial Cognition: Making Sense of People
Howard, J. A., & Kunda, Z. (2000) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2654104 · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
Accountability and complexity of thought.
Tetlock, P. E. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.74 · Cited by 995 · see citing works
Redlawsk, D. P. (2002) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/1468-2508.00161 · Cited by 978 · see citing works
National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet
Chang, L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2009) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfp075 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence
Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00051 · Cited by 841 · see citing works
Self-citationElite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate
BULLOCK, J. G. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055411000165 · Cited by 777 · see citing works
Kunda, Z. (1999) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6291.001.0001 · Cited by 777 · see citing works
Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment.
Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Preston, E. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1231 · Cited by 738 · see citing works
Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects
Slothuus, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2010) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s002238161000006x · Cited by 736 · see citing works
A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning.
Tetlock, P. E. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.819 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics
Bullock, J. G., Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J., & Huber, G. A. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1561/100.00014074 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2669312 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
Three Steps toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning
Lodge, M. G., & Taber, C. S. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805813.009 · Cited by 611 · see citing works
Smith, M. B., Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. (1961) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419686 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Tetlock, P. E., Skitka, L. J., & Boettger, R. D. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.632 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Cultural Cognition of the Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology
Braman, D., Kahan, D. M., Slovic, P., Gastil, J., & Cohen, G. L. (2009) · Scholarly Commons - George Washington University Law School (George Washington University) · Cited by 508 · see citing works
GREEN, D. P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2017) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/9780300132007 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
The Myth of the independent voter
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-1773 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Campaigning for hearts and minds: how emotional appeals in political ads work
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-5558 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Nicholson, S. P. (2012) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00541.x · Cited by 455 · see citing works
The Sage handbook of social psychology
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-4968 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters: A Benefit of Elite Polarization
Levendusky, M. S. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-009-9094-0 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Magleby, K., Keith, B. E., Magleby, D. B., Nelson, C. J., & Orr, E. (1992) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520912236 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Lavine, H. G., Johnston, C. D., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199772759.001.0001 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
The Social Citizen: Peer Networks and Political Behavior
Sinclair, B. (2012) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226922836.001.0001 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Framing, Motivated Reasoning, and Opinions About Emergent Technologies
Druckman, J. N., & Bolsen, T. (2011) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01562.x · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Self-citationMoney, Time, and Political Knowledge: Distinguishing Quick Recall and Political Learning Skills
Prior, M., & Lupia, A. (2008) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00306.x · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Petersen, M. B., Skov, M., Serritzlew, S., & Ramsøy, T. Z. (2012) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-012-9213-1 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Malhotra, N. A., & Krosnick, J. A. (2007) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpm003 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Framing, Motivated Reasoning, and Opinions about Emergent TechnologiesPreprint
Bolsen, T., & Druckman, J. N. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Self-citationCampaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections
Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M., & PARKIN, M. (2009) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055409990037 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Self-citationA Source of Bias in Public Opinion Stability
Druckman, J. N., Fein, J., & Leeper, T. J. (2012) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000123 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationCan Partisan Cues Diminish Democratic Accountability?
Arceneaux, K. (2007) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9044-7 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Biased Processing as a Function of Attitude Accessibility: Making Objective Judgments Subjectively
Houston, D. A., & Fázio, R. H. (1989) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1989.7.1.51 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
THE DECLINE OF PARTIES IN THE MINDS OF CITIZENS
Clarke, H. D., & Stewart, M. C. (1998) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.357 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Exploring the Latent Structure of Strength‐related Attitude Attributes
Visser, P. S., Bizer, G. Y., & Krosnick, J. A. (2006) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38001-x · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Party Affiliation, Partisanship, and Political Beliefs: A Field Experiment
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., & Washington, E. (2010) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055410000407 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Shot by the Messenger: Partisan Cues and Public Opinion Regarding National Security and War
Baum, M., & Groeling, T. J. (2008) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-008-9074-9 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Attitudes: Foundations, Functions, and Consequences
Fázio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2007) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781848608221.n6 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Accessibility and the Political Utility of Partisan and Ideological Orientations
Huckfeldt, R., Levine, J., Morgan, W., & Sprague, J. D. (1999) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2991839 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Druckman, J. N. (2012) · Critical Review · doi:10.1080/08913811.2012.711022 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Sage Handbook of Social Psychology
Guha, M. (2004) · Reference Reviews · doi:10.1108/09504120410520863 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Measuring party support: Leaners are not independents
Petrocik, J. R. (2009) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2009.05.022 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Wilcock, N. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003271871-2 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Arzheimer, K. (2008) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-90400-9_19 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Party Identification, Issue Attitudes, and the Dynamics of Political Debate
Dancey, L., & Goren, P. (2010) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00454.x · Cited by 136 · see citing works
The Polls--Trends: Public Opinion on Energy Policy: 1974-2006
Bolsen, T., & Cook, F. L. (2008) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfn019 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationAtkeson, L. R., & Maestas, C. D. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139108560 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Compton, J. (2006) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00310.x · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Societal and Managerial Implications of Implicit Social Cognition: Why Milliseconds Matter
Chugh, D. (2004) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/b:sore.0000027410.26010.40 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Instrumental Bias in Motivated Reasoning: More When More Is Needed
Boiney, L. G., Kennedy, J. J., & Nye, P. (1997) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1997.2729 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
An Analysis of Intransitivities in the Index of Party Identification
Petrocik, J. R. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 112 · see citing works
The Impact of accuracy and effort feedback and goals on adaptive decision behavior
Creyer, E. H., Bettman, J. R., & Payne, J. W. (1990) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960030102 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Druckman, J. N., Kuklinski, J. H., & Sigelman, L. (2009) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-009-9092-2 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationHow Predictive Appeals Affect Policy Opinions
Jerit, J. (2009) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00378.x · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-Interest and Attention to News Among Issue Publics
Bolsen, T., & Leeper, T. J. (2013) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737428 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationResponse Latency Methodology for Survey Research: Measurement and Modeling Strategies
Mulligan, K., Grant, J. T., Mockabee, S. T., et al. (2003) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpg004 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Is Public Opinion Stable? Resolving the Micro/Macro Disconnect in Studies of Public Opinion
Druckman, J. N., & Leeper, T. J. (2012) · Daedalus · doi:10.1162/daed_a_00173 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationSniderman, P., & Highton, B. (2011) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400840304 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Mutz, D. C. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617201.006 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Catastrophic Politics: How Extraordinary Events Redefine Perceptions of Government
Atkeson, L. R., & Maestas, C. D. (2012) · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Political independence in America, III: In search of closet partisans
Dennis, J. (1992) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf00991981 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Public Opinion on Energy Policy, 1974-2006
Bolsen, T. (2006) · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationX. The Myth of the Independent Voter Revisited
Magleby, D. B., Nelson, C. J., & Westlye, M. C. (2011) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400840304-012 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Smith, J. R., Terry, D. J., Crosier, T., & Duck, J. M. (2005) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2702_7 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response
Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z · Cited by 4,964 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12394 · Cited by 1,183 · see citing works
Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017) · Global Challenges · doi:10.1002/gch2.201600008 · Cited by 1,058 · see citing works
The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief
Van Bavel, J. J., & Pereira, A. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004 · Cited by 743 · see citing works
The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation
Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Self-citationMisinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public
van der Linden, S. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Segregation by Design: Local Politics and Inequality in American Cities
Trounstine, J. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108555722 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Kahan, D. M. (2016) · Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0417 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Self-citationThe US news media, polarization on climate change, and pathways to effective communication
Bolsen, T., & Shapiro, M. A. (2018) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2017.1397039 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Self-citationThe gateway belief model: a large-scale replication
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.009 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Jerit, J., & Zhao, Y. (2020) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032814 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Do (microtargeted) deepfakes have real effects on political attitudes?
Dobber, T., Metoui, N., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., & de Vreese, C. (2021) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161220944364 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Peterson, E., & Iyengar, S. (2019) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/pmn7h · Cited by 241 · see citing works
“…emphasizes that the material benefits of political participation that accrue to individuals are trivial (Downs, 1957) and, absent an express admonition to avoid bias, previous studies find that information processing appears to resemble motivated reasoning (Bolsen et al., 2014; Prior et al., 2015).”
BackgroundThe Politics of Beauty: The Effects of Partisan Bias on Physical Attractiveness
Nicholson, S. P., Coe, C. M., Emory, J., & Song, A. V. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9339-7 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Learning Together Slowly: Bayesian Learning about Political Facts
Hill, S. J. (2017) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/692739 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
The Effects of Uncertainty Frames in Three Science Communication Topics
Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2019) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547019870811 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Scientific agreement can neutralize politicization of facts
Linden, S. V. D., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0259-2 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
When and How Different Motives Can Drive Motivated Political Reasoning
Bayes, R., Druckman, J. N., Goods, A., & Molden, D. C. (2020) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12663 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental effects of climate messages vary geographically
Zhang, B., van der Linden, S., Mildenberger, M., Marlon, J. R., Howe, P. D., & Leiserowitz, A. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0122-0 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Affective polarization and misinformation belief
Jenke, L. (2024) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-022-09851-w · Cited by 85 · see citing works
When Efforts to Depolarize the Electorate Fail
Levendusky, M. S. (2018) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfy036 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
How to study democratic backsliding
Druckman, J. N. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12942 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Role of Source, Headline and Expressive Responding in Political News Evaluation
Jakesch, M., Koren, M., Evtushenko, A., & Naaman, M. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3306403 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Testing theories of political persuasion using AI
Argyle, L. P., Busby, E. C., Gubler, J. R., Lyman, A., Olcott, J., Pond, J., & Wingate, D. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2412815122 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Partisan bias and citizen satisfaction, confidence, and trust in the U.S. Federal Government
Morgeson III, F. V., Sharma, P. N., Sharma, U., & Hult, G. T. M. (2022) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1945667 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Examining the trade‐off between confidence and optimism in future forecasts
Stavrova, O., & Evans, A. M. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2087 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Factual knowledge can reduce attitude polarization
Stagnaro, M. N., & Amsalem, E. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58697-3 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“In Supplementary Note 2, we also show that the results hold when using instrumental variables to estimate the complier average treatment effects, which take into account non-compliance.”
InfluentialPolitical polarization and corruption: A theoretical and empirical review
Hajnal, Á. (2024) · Intersections · doi:10.17356/ieejsp.v10i2.1310 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“…decisionmaking as it decreases the relative weight of substantive arguments visávis partisan cues in citi - zens’ political opinion formation (Bolsen et al., 2014; Druckman et al., 2013) and can deteri - orate democratic accountability by making voters less sensitive to new information…”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Druckman, James N.
- Venue
- Political Behavior
- Published
- 2013-07-04
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-262
- ISSN
- 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6687
- OpenAlex
- W2056426645
- Cited by
- 891
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 62 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 136 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 88.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- partisan motivated reasoning, party identification, public opinion, opinion formation, energy policy, bipartisan support, partisanship, survey experiment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
