Cited by 202Team Dynamics and PerformanceSocial and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social loafing and group evaluation

Harkins, Stephen G., Szymanski, Kate·1989·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Recent work (e.g., Harkins, 1987; Szymanski & Harkins, 1987) has suggested that social loafing occurs because participants' outputs cannot be evaluated by the experimenter, by the coactors, or by the participants themselves. This analysis has focused on the output of the individual, but in loafing research, participants work together to produce a product. However, in this prior work participants have been unable to make anything of this product, because no standard of comparison has been made available. Several recent formulations (e.g., Goethals & Darley, 1987) have suggested that the potential for evaluation could motivate performance. Testing this hypothesis in 2 experiments, 1 using an optimizing task and the other a maximizing task, we found that providing a standard that allowed the group to evaluate its performance eliminated the loafing effect. The implications of these findings for current theories of evaluation are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.56.6.934

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Harkins, S. G., & Szymanski, K.
Affiliations
Northeastern University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1989-06
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
934-941
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W1979172573
Cited by
198
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
social loafing, group assessment, performance evaluation (human resources), evaluation standards, group performance, motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review