The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social loafing and group evaluation
Abstract
Recent work (e.g., Harkins, 1987; Szymanski & Harkins, 1987) has suggested that social loafing occurs because participants' outputs cannot be evaluated by the experimenter, by the coactors, or by the participants themselves. This analysis has focused on the output of the individual, but in loafing research, participants work together to produce a product. However, in this prior work participants have been unable to make anything of this product, because no standard of comparison has been made available. Several recent formulations (e.g., Goethals & Darley, 1987) have suggested that the potential for evaluation could motivate performance. Testing this hypothesis in 2 experiments, 1 using an optimizing task and the other a maximizing task, we found that providing a standard that allowed the group to evaluate its performance eliminated the loafing effect. The implications of these findings for current theories of evaluation are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“our findings that whole-dorm feedback can motivate conservation is consistent with other research findings that feedback on the performance of larger groups can effectively motivate behavior change [35].”
In the citing paper
“A substantial body of research (e.g., George, 1992; Harkins and Szymanski, 1989) identifies individual responsibility, task identifiability, and accountability as key mechanisms for mitigating social loafing.”
From The Moderating Influence of In-Group Collectivism on Social Loafing: An Experimental Study on a Manufacturing Factory (2026) · cites this paper as Harkins and Szymanski, 1989
Citations
Cites
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,626
Social Foundations of Thought and Action
Bandura, A. (2002) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446221129.n6 · Cited by 9,948
(1978) · Cited by 5,009
In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.
Brewer, M. B. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307 · Cited by 3,411
Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing
Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822 · Cited by 2,216
Self-citation(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,355
Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.
Pettigrew, T. F., Suls, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1979) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066199 · Cited by 1,164
Mullen, B. R., & Goethals, G. R. (1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3 · Cited by 985
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social loafing: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration.
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681 · Cited by 2,196
Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices
Leana, C. R., & van Buren, H. J. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2202136 · Cited by 2,063
Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment.
Stasser, G. L., & Stewart, D. D. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.426 · Cited by 613
Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P. M., & Lynch, P. (1998) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.288 · Cited by 608
Social Foundations of Cognition
Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. Β., & Higgins, E. T. (1993) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.003101 · Cited by 567
Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed
Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700205 · Cited by 550
Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance.
Williams, K. D., & Karau, S. J. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.570 · Cited by 501
EMPLOYEE PROPENSITY TO WITHHOLD EFFORT: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL TO INTERSECT THREE AVENUES OF RESEARCH
Kidwell, R. E., & Bennett, N. (1993) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1993.9309035146 · Cited by 424
Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis.
Shepperd, J. A. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.67 · Cited by 422
van Dick, R. (2001) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00068 · Cited by 328
Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups
Chidambaram, L., & Tung, L. L. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0051 · Cited by 323
Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2003) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(03)00049-3 · Cited by 299
Alnuaimi, O. A., Robert, L., & Maruping, L. M. (2010) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222270109 · Cited by 265
Distal and Local Group Learning: Performance Trade-offs and Tensions
Wong, S. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0080 · Cited by 261
Team Scaffolds: How Mesolevel Structures Enable Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Groups
Valentine, M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0947 · Cited by 246
A Model of Social Loafing in Real Work Groups
Comer, D. R. (1995) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679504800603 · Cited by 217
IS GROUP PRODUCTIVITY LOSS THE RULE OR THE EXCEPTION? EFFECTS OF CULTURE AND GROUP-BASED MOTIVATION.
Erez, M., & Somech, A. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257067 · Cited by 211
The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation.
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1997) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.1.2.156 · Cited by 202
Organizational Behavior: Where We'Ve Been, Where Were Going
O’Reilly, C. A. (1991) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.002235 · Cited by 200
Making better decisions in groups
Bang, D., & Frith, C. (2017) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.170193 · Cited by 210
Group Behavior and Performance
Hackman, J. R., & Katz, N. R. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002032 · Cited by 187
My Job is My Castle: Identification in Organizational Contexts
van Dick, R. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0470013311.ch6 · Cited by 174
Brophy, D. R. (2001) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1334_20 · Cited by 115
The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation
Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190648077.001.0001 · Cited by 171
Hertel, G., Kerr, N. L., & Messé, L. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.580 · Cited by 166
Karau, S. J., & Hart, J. W. (1998) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.2.3.185 · Cited by 160
e-collaboration: the reality of virtuality
Rutkowski, A. F., Vogel, D., van Genuchten, M., Bemelmans, T. M. A., & Favier, M. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2002.805147 · Cited by 148
Jassawalla, A. R., Sashittal, H. C., & Sashittal, A. (2009) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2009.37012178 · Cited by 133
Automation Bias and Errors: Are Crews Better Than Individuals?
Skitka, L. J., Mosier, K. L., Burdick, M., & Rosenblatt, B. (2000) · The International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap1001_5 · Cited by 127
Humphrey, A. M. (2012) · The Psychologist-Manager Journal · doi:10.1080/10887156.2012.731831 · Cited by 131
Exploring Predictors of Student Team Project Performance
Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A., & Stewart-Belle, S. (1998) · Journal of Marketing Education · doi:10.1177/027347539802000108 · Cited by 95
The Collective Origins of Valued Originality
Haslam, S. A., Adarves‐Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Jans, L. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868313498001 · Cited by 96
Social Loafing and Expectancy-Value Theory
Shepperd, J. A., & Taylor, K. M. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672992512008 · Cited by 89
Working harder with the out-group: The impact of social category diversity on motivation gains
Lount, R. B., & Phillips, K. W. (2007) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.03.002 · Cited by 81
Social Influence Processing in Computer Brainstorming
Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., Putman, V. L., Leggett, K. L., & Roland, E. J. (1996) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1801_2 · Cited by 81
Pescosolido, A. T., & Saavedra, R. (2012) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496412465020 · Cited by 95
Increasing Student Participation and Productivity in Small-Group Activities for Psychology Classes
Meyers, S. A. (1997) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15328023top2402_5 · Cited by 74
Smith, B. N., Kerr, N. A., Markus, M. J., & Stasson, M. F. (2001) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.5.2.150 · Cited by 67
Factors influencing the willingness to contribute information to online communities
Li, X. (2010) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444810372164 · Cited by 66
van Orden, C. Y. D., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Buunk, B. P. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1179 · Cited by 67
Identifiability, Performance Feedback and the Köhler Effect
Kerr, N. L., Messé, L. A., Park, E. S., & Sambolec, E. J. (2005) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430205056466 · Cited by 63
Lount, R. B., & Wilk, S. L. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1820 · Cited by 58
A Comparison of Individual and Group Efforts to Creatively Solve Contrasting Types of Problems
Brophy, D. R. (2006) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_6 · Cited by 56
Effects of Sleep Loss on Team Decision Making: Motivational Loss or Motivational Gain?
Baranski, J. V., Thompson, M. M., Lichacz, F. M. J., McCann, C., Gil, V., Pastò, L., & Pigeau, R. (2007) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872007x215728 · Cited by 53
Petersen, J. E., Frantz, C. M., Shammin, M. R., Yanisch, T. M., Tincknell, E., & Myers, N. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144070 · Cited by 51
“Although data from our study supports the view that finer scale feedback enhances motivation, our findings that whole-dorm feedback can motivate conservation is consistent with other research findings that feedback on the performance of larger groups can effectively motivate behavior change [35].”
Negotiating teams: A levels of analysis approach.
Brodt, S. E., & Thompson, L. (2001) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037//1089-2699.5.3.208 · Cited by 51
Social Loafing and Motivation Gains in Groups: An Integrative Review
Karau, S. J., & Wilhau, A. J. (2020) · Individual Motivation within Groups · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-849867-5.00001-x · Cited by 50
Looking down and ramping up: The impact of status differences on effort in intergroup contexts
Pettit, N. C., & Lount, R. B. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.008 · Cited by 50
Group membership salience and task performance
van Dick, R., Stellmacher, J., Wagner, U., Lemmer, G., & Tissington, P. (2009) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940910989011 · Cited by 46
The Effects of Misperception of Performance in Brainstorming Groups
Homma, M., TAJIMA, K., & HAYASHI, M. (1995) · THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY · doi:10.2130/jjesp.34.221 · Cited by 44
Hart, J. W., Karau, S. J., Stasson, M. F., & Kerr, N. A. (2004) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02580.x · Cited by 44
Brewer, N. (1995) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01774.x · Cited by 42
Understanding, Measuring, Enhancing Collective Creative Problem-Solving Efforts
Brophy, D. R. (1998) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1103_2 · Cited by 41
Charbonnier, E., Huguet, P., Bräuer, M., & Monteil, J. (1998) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.1998.26.4.329 · Cited by 39
Huguet, P., Charbonnier, E., & Monteil, J. (1999) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.3.2.118 · Cited by 37
Channon, S. B., Davis, R. C., Goode, N. T., & May, S. A. (2016) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-016-9680-y · Cited by 43
Visualized Automatic Feedback in Virtual Teams
Glikson, E., Woolley, A. W., Gupta, P., & Kim, Y. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00814 · Cited by 34
Colpaert, L., Dominique Muller, B., Fayant, M., & Butera, F. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01337 · Cited by 33
Board ownership and processes in family firms
Zona, F. (2014) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9587-z · Cited by 34
Student Perceptions of Social Loafing in Undergraduate Business Classroom Teams
Jassawalla, A. R., Malshe, A., & Sashittal, H. C. (2008) · Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00183.x · Cited by 33
Performance and Learning Goal Orientations as Moderators of Social Loafing and Social Facilitation
Gagné, M., & Zuckerman, M. (1999) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649649903000502 · Cited by 33
On the Elusive Search for Motivation Gains in Groups: Insights from the Collective Effort Model
Karau, S. J., Markus, M. J., & Williams, K. D. (2000) · Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1024//0044-3514.31.4.179 · Cited by 33
Stieglitz, S., Mirbabaie, M., Möllmann, N. R. J., & Rzyski, J. (2021) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10201-0 · Cited by 35
Schnieder, C. (2018) · Journal of Accounting Literature · doi:10.1108/jal-11-2021-0006 · Cited by 32
Arterberry, M., Cain, K., & Chopko, S. A. (2007) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410701308755 · Cited by 38
The Effects of Incentive System and Cognitive Orientation on Teams' Performance
Naranjo‐Gil, D., Cuevas‐Rodríguez, G., Cabrales, Á. L., & Sánchez, J. M. (2012) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria-50098 · Cited by 33
Effects of Anonymity and Social Comparison of Rewards on Computer-Mediated Group Brainstorming
McLeod, P. L. (2011) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496410397381 · Cited by 31
Role of social loafing in predeliberation decision making.
Henningsen, D. D., Cruz, M. G., & Miller, M. L. (2000) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037//1089-2699.4.2.168 · Cited by 30
Individual performance as a function of individual and group pay contingencies
Honeywell, J. A., Dickinson, A. M., & Poling, A. D. (1997) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395224 · Cited by 29
Understanding the effect of social networks on user behaviors in community-driven knowledge services
Kang, M., Kim, B., Gloor, P. A., & Bock, G. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21533 · Cited by 28
Monteil, J., & Huguet, P. (1993) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207599308246948 · Cited by 27
Hütter, M., & Diehl, M. (2011) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430211402405 · Cited by 26
Evaluation is necessary to produce stereotype threat performance effects
Jamieson, J. P., & Harkins, S. G. (2010) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510903512409 · Cited by 26
Self-citationInvestigating the Role of the Big Five on the Social Loafing of Information Technology Workers1
Ülke, H. E., & Bilgiç, R. (2011) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00559.x · Cited by 26
Children’s Emergent Leadership
Yamaguchi, R., & Maehr, M. L. (2004) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496404263272 · Cited by 26
A Systems Perspective on Trainee Impairment
Elman, N. S., Forrest, L. M., Vacha‐Haase, T., & Gizara, S. S. (1999) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000099275005 · Cited by 25
Working Hard to Achieve Self-Defining Group Goals: A Social Identity Analysis
Fielding, K. S., & Hogg, M. A. (2000) · Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1024//0044-3514.31.4.191 · Cited by 23
Guérin, B. (1999) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395327 · Cited by 23
Guérin, B. (1995) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1995.9713966 · Cited by 22
Only When Others Are Watching: The Contingent Efforts of High Status Group Members
Lount, R. B., Doyle, S., Brion, S., & Pettit, N. C. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3103 · Cited by 21
Monaghan, C., Bizumić, B., Reynolds, K. J., Smithson, M. J., Johns-Boast, L., & Rooy, D. V. (2014) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2014.914156 · Cited by 21
Mitigating Social Loafing in Team-Based Learning
Frash, R. E., Kline, S. F., & Stahura, J. M. (2004) · Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism · doi:10.1300/j172v03n04_04 · Cited by 21
Toplumsal Bir Hastalık: Sosyal Kaytarma
Ilgın, B. (2013) · Usak University Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.12780/uusbd215 · Cited by 20
Lean back or lean in? Exploring social loafing in human–robot teams
Cymek, D. H., Truckenbrodt, A., & Onnasch, L. (2023) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2023.1249252 · Cited by 19
Social loafing in a competitive context
Heuzé, J.-P., & Brunel, P. C. (2003) · International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1612197x.2003.9671717 · Cited by 19
Role Schemata and Member Motivation in Task Groups
Kerr, N. L., & Stanfel, J. A. (1993) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167293194008 · Cited by 19
Individuals and dyads in a multiple-cue judgment task: Cognitive processes and performance
Olsson, A.-C., Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.01.004 · Cited by 17
Scudder, J. N., Herschel, R. T., & Crossland, M. D. (1994) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496494251005 · Cited by 16
Role of Fisher Group in The Fisheries Development in Sadeng Coast Gunungkidul Regency
Rakhmanda, A., Suadi, S., & Djasmani, S. S. (2018) · Sodality Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan · doi:10.22500/sodality.v6i2.23225 · Cited by 16
Midden, C., Kimura, H., Ham, J. R. C., Nakajima, T., & Kleppe, M. (2011) · doi:10.1145/2467803.2467804 · Cited by 15
Kelly, J. R., McCarty, M. K., & Iannone, N. E. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_14 · Cited by 17
Cao, S. A., MacLaren, N. G., Cao, Y., Marshall, J., Dong, Y., Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Martin, R. W., et al. (2022) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2022/8265296 · Cited by 14
Abele, S., & Diehl, M. R. (2008) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430207084845 · Cited by 17
Social Loafing and Expectancy-Value Theory
Shepperd, J. A. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0801-4_1 · Cited by 14
Huang, L., Zheng, J., Lajoie, S. P., Chen, Y., Hmelo‐Silver, C. E., & Wang, M. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12131-7 · Cited by 15
Students generating questions for their own written examinations
Papinczak, T., Babri, A. S., Peterson, R., Kippers, V., & Wilkinson, D. (2009) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-009-9196-9 · Cited by 13
Sales team formation: The right team member helps performance
Garrett, J., & Gopalakrishna, S. (2017) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.06.007 · Cited by 17
Working Hard to Get People to Loaf
Price, K. H. (1993) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1403_6 · Cited by 13
The social context of human learning: Some prospects for the study of socio-cognitive regulations
Monteil, J., & Huguet, P. (1993) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/bf03172698 · Cited by 12
Psychological backgrounds for inducing cooperation in peer-to-peer television
Fokker, J. E., de Ridder, H., Westendorp, P. H., & Pouwelse, J. A. (2007) · doi:10.5555/1763017.1763036 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Harkins, S. G., & Szymanski, K.
- Affiliations
- Northeastern University (US)
- ORCID
- Szymanski, Kate
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1989-06
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 934-941
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1979172573
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- social loafing, group assessment, performance evaluation (human resources), evaluation standards, group performance, motivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review