CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32Social Robot Interaction and HRIFace Recognition and PerceptionFace recognition and analysis

What the human face tells the human mind: some challenges for the robot-human interface

Bruce, V.·2003·[1992] Proceedings IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication
DOI 10.1109/roman.1992.253910
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The human face serves a variety of different communicative functions in social interaction. The face mediates person identification, the perception of emotional expressions and lipreading. Perceiving the direction of social attention, and facial attractiveness, also affect interpersonal behaviour. This paper reviews these different uses made of facial information, and considers their computational demands. The possible link between the perception of faces and deeper levels of social understanding is emphasised through a discussion of developmental deficits affecting social cognition. Finally, the implications for the development of communication between robots and humans is discussed. It is concluded that it could be useful both for robots to understand human faces, and also to display human-like facial gestures themselves.>

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/roman.1992.253910

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Lyons et al. method achieved a generalization rate of 92 percent when tested on 193 images divided into 10 segments.

    “The generalization rate was 92 percent.”

    From Automatic analysis of facial expressions: the state of the art (2000) · cites this paper as [51]

  • The Lyons et al. method achieved a generalization rate of 75 percent for recognition of expression of a novel subject when the image set was partitioned into nine segments, each corresponding to one expresser.

    “The generalization rate was 75 percent for recognition of expression of a novel subject.”

    From Automatic analysis of facial expressions: the state of the art (2000) · cites this paper as [51]

  • Lyons et al. used a similar face representation for expression classification into the six basic plus neutral emotion categories.

    “A similar face representation was recently used by Lyons et al. [51] for expression classification into the six basic plus ªneutralº emotion categories.”

    From Automatic analysis of facial expressions: the state of the art (2000) · cites this paper as [51]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Bruce, V.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Bruce, V.
ORCID
Bruce, V.
Venue
[1992] Proceedings IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2003-01-02
Pages
44-51
ISSN
1944-9437 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/roman.1992.253910
OpenAlex
W1892190109
Cited by
32
References
64
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.47
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE RO-MAN (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Nottingham
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
face perception, social cognition, emotional expression recognition, lip reading, personal identification, social attention, facial attractiveness, facial gestures, human-robot communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review