Cited by 96Innovative Human-Technology InteractionAI in Service InteractionsTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Hey Alexa! A Magic Spell of Social Glue?: Sharing a Smart Voice Assistant Speaker and Its Impact on Users’ Perception of Group Harmony

Lee, Kiljae, Lee, Kyung Young, Sheehan, Lorn·2020·Information Systems Frontiers

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10796-019-09975-1

Cites

140 of 140 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 145 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, K., Lee, K. Y., & Sheehan, L.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Lee, Kiljae
Venue
Information Systems Frontiers
Published
2019-12-14
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
563-583
ISSN
  • 1387-3326 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9419
OpenAlex
W2996435796
Cited by
95
References
145
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 2
FWCI
8.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information Systems Frontiers (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
Amazon Alexa, group harmony, social cohesion, social integration, family interaction, hedonic motivation, device compatibility, perceived security, user satisfaction, conversational technologies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review