The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Aggression Questionnaire.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“IPIP-NEO agreeableness for all base Llama 2 models and Mixtral 8x7B failed to adequately and significantly correlate with any Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ)43 subscale, demonstrating unacceptable criterion validity.”
From A psychometric framework for evaluating and shaping personality traits in large language models (2025) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“These criterion measures were drawn from widely used instruments developed and psychometrically validated for human research, including PANAS scales40, Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ)43, Revised Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ-RR)44 and Short Scale of Creative Self (SSCS)47.”
From A psychometric framework for evaluating and shaping personality traits in large language models (2025) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“Test-retest reliability rtt=0.80 (high), Cronbach α=0.68-0.8 for each subscale (moderate-high) [108]”
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality.
Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192 · Cited by 2,442
Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., Cella, D., & PROMIS Cooperative Group (2011) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191111411667 · Cited by 2,132
Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00534-2 · Cited by 2,151
Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual-Differences Metric
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2015) · Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_2 · Cited by 2,147
The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad
Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0019265 · Cited by 2,093
Metadata
- Authors
- Buss, A. H., & Perry, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 452-459
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W4292810003
- Cited by
- 4,693
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 248 · 2025: 257 · 2024: 272 · 2023: 310 · 2022: 297 · 2021: 293 · 2020: 245 · 2019: 257 · 2018: 258 · 2017: 223 · 2016: 224 · 2015: 210 · 2014: 183 · 2013: 148 · 2012: 157
- FWCI
- 10.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- aggression, aggression measurement, questionnaire development, antisocial behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
