Cited by 599Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Religion's role in adjustment to a negative life event: Coping with the loss of a child.

McIntosh, Daniel N., Silver, Roxane Cohen, Wortman, Camille B.·1993·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Parents (N = 124) who had lost an infant to sudden infant death syndrome were interviewed 3 weeks and 18 months postloss. Two components of religion (religious participation and religious importance) were assessed, and their relations with 3 coping-process variables (perceived social support, cognitive processing of the loss, and finding meaning in the death) were examined. Greater religious participation was related to increased perception of social support and greater meaning found in the loss. Importance of religion was positively related to cognitive processing and finding meaning in the death. Furthermore, through these coping-process variables, religious participation and importance were indirectly related to greater well-being and less distress among parents 18 months after their infants' deaths. Results suggest that further study of the social and cognitive aspects of religion would be profitable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.812

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Religious parents appear to be better able to cope with the loss of a child.

    “For example, religious parents appear to be better able to cope with the loss of a child [47].”
  • Greater religious participation is related to increased perception of social support, contributing to less grief-related distress for parents.

    “Furthermore, religious communities have been found to be beneficial as another source of social support, as greater religious participation has been related to increased perception of social support contributing to less grief-related distress for parents.33”

    From Complicated grief after perinatal loss (2012) · cites this paper as [33]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McIntosh, D. N., Silver, R. C., & Wortman, C. B.
Affiliations
University of Denver (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1993
Volume
65
Issue
4
Pages
812-821
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2023754581
Cited by
598
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 19
FWCI
13.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (MCJ-260470)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
religion, sudden infant death syndrome, parental bereavement, coping, social support, religious participation, religious significance, well-being, distress, life events
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Attitude to Death, Bereavement, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Life Change Events, Male, Parents, Religion and Psychology, Sudden Infant Death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review