Cited by 513Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

Intraindividual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior: Incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality.

Shoda, Yuichi, Mischel, Walter, Wright, Jack C.·1994·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

In nomothetic analyses, the cross-situational consistency of individual differences in social behavior, assessed in vivo in a camp setting, dependent on the similarity in the psychological features of situations. As predicted by the social-cognitive theory of personality, idiographic analyses revealed that individuals were characterized by stable profiles of if ... then ...,situation-behavior relationships that formed "behavioral signatures" of personality (e.g., he aggresses when warned by adults but complies when threatened by peers. Thus, the intraindividual organization of behavior variation across situations was enduring but discriminatively patterned, visible as distinctive profiles of situation-behavior relationships. Implications were examined for an idiographic reconceptualization of personality coherence and its behavioral expressions in relation to the psychological ingredients of situations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.674

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Wright, J. C.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1994
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
674-687
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4232568532
Cited by
513
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 22
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH39349, MH45994, R01MH045994)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
intra-individual stability, behavior organization, idiographic analysis, personality, psychological situation, within-person variability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Psychology, Child, Female, Humans, Individuality, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Personality, Social Environment, Reproducibility of Results, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review