Cited by 103Mental Health Research TopicsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingReliability and Agreement in Measurement

Measuring people intensively.

Moskowitz, D. S., Russell, Jennifer J., Sadikaj, Gentiana, Sutton, Rachel·2009·Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne

Abstract

An overview is provided of measures that are administered repeatedly in daily life. Variations of thismethodology have been referred to as ecological momentary assessment, diary methods, daily processmeasures, and most broadly as intensive repeated measures in naturalistic settings (IRM-NS). Contrastsare drawn between IRM-NS methods on the basis of different sampling strategies, such as time-contingent recording, signal-contingent recording, and event-contingent recording. Common threats tothe internal validity, construct validity, and external validity of IRM-NS measures are reviewed, alongwith ways to reduce these threats. The statistical analysis of IRM-NS data is considered, with a particularfocus on the investigation of intraindividual variability. An extended example is provided of an IRM-NSmeasure, an event-contingent recording method for the assessment of interpersonal behaviour.Keywords: ecological momentary assessment, daily diary methods, naturalistic assessments, IRM-NSvalidity, IRM-NS reliability

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0016625

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moskowitz, D. S., Russell, J. J., Sadikaj, G., & Sutton, R.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Venue
Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne
Published
2009-08
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
131-140
ISSN
  • 0708-5591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-7304
OpenAlex
W2044858168
Cited by
103
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  • Fonds Québécois de la Recherche Sur la Société et la Culture
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords
ecological momentary assessment, daily diary method, naturalistic assessment, within-person variability, measurement validity, measurement reliability, interpersonal behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review