The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adult Attachment Style and Individual Differences in Functional Versus Dysfunctional Experiences of Anger
Abstract
Three studies examined the association between adult attachment and anger. Study 1 examined attachment-style differences in self-reports of anger-proneness, anger expression, anger goals, and responses to anger. Study 2 assessed attachment style, physiological signs of anger, and attribution of hostile intent. Study 3 used a lexical-decision task for studying attachment-style differences in expected anger outcome. Secure persons scored lower in anger-proneness, endorsed more constructive anger goals, reported more adaptive responses and more positive affect in anger episodes, attributed less hostile intent to others, and expected more positive outcomes than insecure persons. For ambivalent persons, the anger experience also included lack of anger control and anger-in. For avoidant persons, it included high hostility, escapist responses, and lack of awareness of physiological signs of anger. The underlying action of working models is emphasized in the discussion.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Insecure attachment constitutes a major psychological vulnerability, associated with maladaptive emotion regulation, reduced well-being, and difficulty coping with distress (Maunder & Hunter 2001;Mikulincer 1998;Shaver et al. 2005).”
From Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions (2026) · cites this paper as Mikulincer 1998
In the citing paper
“These dispositions shape how people cope with unmet relational needs (Mikulincer 1998;Shaver et al. 2005) and may condition their propensity to form intimate bonds with AI companions.”
From Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions (2026) · cites this paper as Mikulincer 1998
In the citing paper
“For users predisposed to attachment insecurity, these asymmetries may heighten relational anxiety (Mikulincer 1998;Pietromonaco & Beck 2019).”
From Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions (2026) · cites this paper as Mikulincer 1998
In the citing paper
“Attachment theory, originating in developmental psychology (Ainsworth & Bowlby 1991) and later extended to adult relationships (Hazan & Shaver 1987), explains enduring differences in caregiving, intimacyseeking, and emotion regulation through internal models of the self and others (Mikulincer 1998).”
From Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions (2026) · cites this paper as Mikulincer 1998
Citations
Cites
Lyons-Ruth, K., Repacholi, B., McLeod, S., & Silva, E. (1991) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579400007586 · Cited by 215
Optimism about Love Relationships: General vs Specific Lessons from One's Personal Experiences
Carnelley, K. B., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407592091001 · Cited by 139
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system
Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.261 · Cited by 4,089
Perceptions of Conflict and Support in Romantic Relationships: The Role of Attachment Anxiety
Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J., & Kashy, D. A. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.510 · Cited by 725
Regulating the interpersonal self: Strategic self-regulation for coping with rejection sensitivity.
Ayduk, O., Mendoza-Denton, R., Mischel, W., Downey, G., Peake, P. K., & Rodriguez, M. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.776 · Cited by 669
Powers, S. I., Pietromonaco, P. R., Gunlicks, M., & Sayer, A. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.613 · Cited by 237
Letting bygones be bygones: further evidence for the validity of the Tendency to Forgive scale
Brown, R. P., & Phillips, A. (2005) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.017 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Mikulincer, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 513-524
- ISSN
- 1939-1315
- 0022-3514
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review