Cited by 725Attachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsMarriage and Sexual Relationships

Perceptions of Conflict and Support in Romantic Relationships: The Role of Attachment Anxiety

Campbell, Lorne, Simpson, Jeffry A., Boldry, Jennifer, Kashy, Deborah A.·2005·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Guided by attachment theory, a 2-part study was conducted to test how perceptions of relationship-based conflict and support are associated with relationship satisfaction/closeness and future quality. Dating partners completed diaries for 14 days (Part 1) and then were videotaped while discussing a major problem that occurred during the diary study (Part 2). Part 1 reveals that more anxiously attached individuals perceived more conflict with their dating partners and reported a tendency for conflicts to escalate in severity. Perceptions of daily relationship-based conflicts negatively impacted the perceived satisfaction/closeness and relationship futures of highly anxious individuals, whereas perceptions of greater daily support had positive effects. Part 2 reveals that highly anxious individuals appeared more distressed and escalated the severity of conflicts (rated by observers) and reported feeling more distressed. The authors discuss the unique features of attachment anxiety and how changing perceptions of relationship satisfaction/closeness and stability could erode commitment over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.510

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J., & Kashy, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Montana State University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2005-03
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
510-531
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2136667988
Cited by
725
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 44
FWCI
23.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Keywords
attachment anxiety, romantic relationships, relationship conflict, relationship support, relationship satisfaction, relationship closeness, relationship commitment, conflict escalation, daily diary, dating partners, attachment theory
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Attitude, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Love, Male, Models, Psychological, Object Attachment, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review