Cited by 237Attachment and Relationship DynamicsStress Responses and CortisolNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Dating couples' attachment styles and patterns of cortisol reactivity and recovery in response to a relationship conflict.

Powers, Sally I., Pietromonaco, Paula R., Gunlicks, Meredith, Sayer, Aline·2006·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

This study investigated theoretically predicted links between attachment style and a physiological indicator of stress, salivary cortisol levels, in 124 heterosexual dating couples. Cortisol was assessed at 7 points before and after an experimental conflict negotiation task, creating a trajectory of stress reactivity and recovery for each participant. Growth modeling of cortisol data tested hypotheses that (a) insecurely attached individuals show patterns of greater physiological stress reactions to interpersonal conflict than do securely attached individuals and (b) people with insecurely attached partners show patterns of greater stress in reaction to relationship conflict than those with securely attached partners. Hypothesis 1 was supported, but men and women differed in the type of insecure attachment that predicted stress trajectories. Hypothesis 2 was supported for men, but not for women. The discussion emphasizes the role of gender role norms and partner characteristics in understanding connections between adult attachment and patterns of cortisol responses to interpersonal stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.613

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powers, S. I., Pietromonaco, P. R., Gunlicks, M., & Sayer, A.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2006-04
Volume
90
Issue
4
Pages
613-628
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4241492137
Cited by
237
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH60228-01A1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
adult attachment, attachment styles, salivary cortisol, stress reactivity, cortisol recovery, relationship conflict, conflict negotiation, dating couples, insecure attachment, gender differences, gender role norms, partner attachment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Conflict, Psychological, Courtship, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Massachusetts, Models, Psychological, Object Attachment, Saliva, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Negotiating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review