Cited by 219Leadership, Courage, and Heroism StudiesSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Increasing the salience of one's best selves can undermine inspiration by outstanding role models

Lockwood, Penelope, Kunda, Ziva·1999·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The accessibility of people's highest hopes and achievements can affect their reactions to upward comparisons. Three studies showed that, under normal circumstances, individuals were inspired by an outstanding role model; their motivation and self-evaluations were enhanced. However, when their most positive self-views were temporarily or chronically activated, inspiration was undermined, and individuals' motivation and self-evaluations tended to decrease. Another study found that role models inspired participants to generate more spectacular hopes and achievements than they would have generated otherwise. It appears that increasing the accessibility of one's best selves undercuts inspiration because it constrains the positivity of the future selves one may imagine and prevents one from generating the more spectacular future selves that the role model normally inspires.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.214

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comparing oneself to a successful other can be inspiring but also self-deflating by highlighting how deficient one is in comparison.

    “Although comparing oneself to a successful other can potentially be inspiring and offer one hope, it also has the potential of being self-deflating by highlighting how deficient one is in comparison (Collins, 1996(Collins, , 2000;;Lockwood & Kunda, 1999;Suls, Martin, & Wheeler, 2002;Wood, 1989).”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Lockwood & Kunda, 1999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1999
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
214-228
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4232566290
Cited by
219
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
role models, inspiration, salience, self-concept
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Female, Forecasting, Goals, Humans, Machiavellianism, Male, Mentors, Models, Psychological, Morale, Motivation, Role, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review