Cited by 46Gender Diversity and InequalityCareer Development and DiversitySocial and Intergroup Psychology

Inspirational or Self-Deflating: The Role of Self-Efficacy in Elite Role Model Effectiveness

Hoyt, Crystal L.·2013·Social Psychological and Personality Science

Abstract

This research examines the role of self-efficacy in women’s responses to elite leadership role models. Previous research on role models has been equivocal, demonstrating that the impact of social comparisons on the self is multifaceted. Using an experimental methodology, 102 female participants were presented with role models (elite, nonelite, control) before serving as the leader of an ostensible three-person group. Findings revealed that women with low, as opposed to high, levels of leadership self-efficacy were less inspired by the highly successful role models and showed deflating contrast effects as demonstrated in their diminished identification with leadership, leadership aspirations, and leadership performance. Moreover, the performance effects were mediated by participants’ identification with leadership. This research has identified an important self-regulatory variable that influences whether people engage in assimilative or contrastive processes when making strategic comparisons and it identifies the important role of self-perceptions in behavioral responses to role models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1948550612455066

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women with high versus low levels of leadership efficacy were more inspired by elite role models in a potential threat-inducing leadership situation, showing heightened leadership aspiration, leader self-identification, and performance.

    “For example, women with high, versus low, levels of leadership efficacy were more inspired by elite role models, when put into a potential threat-inducing leadership situation; that is, they showed heightened levels of leadership aspiration, leader self-identification, and performance (Hoyt, 2013).”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Hoyt, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoyt, C. L.
Affiliations
University of Richmond (US)
Corresponding author
Hoyt, Crystal L.
Venue
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Published
2012-08-08
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
290-298
ISSN
  • 1948-5506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-5514
OpenAlex
W1969007802
Cited by
46
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Psychological and Personality Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
self-efficacy, leadership role models, women, social comparison, contrast effects, leadership aspirations, leadership performance, self-regulation, gender and leadership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review