The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When better-than-others compare upward: Choice of comparison and comparative evaluation as independent predictors of academic performance.
Abstract
Social comparison theory has linked improved performance to both the tendency to compare with others who are performing well and the tendency to view the self as better than others. However, little research has investigated the effects of either variable outside of a controlled laboratory environment, Moreover, there is reason to believe that the 2 tendencies would be in opposition to one another, because people who compare upward might subsequently view themselves as relatively less competent. The results of a longitudinal study of 876 students in their Ist year of secondary education indicated that both variables independently predicted improved academic performance and that these 2 tendencies did not conflict.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“studies of adolescents find that affiliation with peers who are highly academically competent may, on the one hand, produce benefits for academic effort by motivating improvements in academic standards and performance, or by providing models for how to complete challenging academic tasks, serving as a form of”
From Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships (2011) · cites this paper as Blanton, Buunk, Gibbons, & Kuyper, 1999
In the citing paper
“Past research on social comparison has typically either focused on comparisons to friends (e.g., Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2003;Guay et al., 1999) or comparisons to classmates in general (e.g., Blanton et al., 1999;Marsh, Kong, & Hau, 2000).”
From Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships (2011) · cites this paper as Blanton et al., 1999
Citations
Cites
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
Higgins, E., & Kruglanski, A. (2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3496 · Cited by 5,535
The Explanatory and Predictive Scope of Self-Efficacy Theory
Bandura, A. (1986) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359 · Cited by 3,771
Downward comparison principles in social psychology
Wills, T. A. (1981) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245 · Cited by 2,705
Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984) · Cited by 2,358
Psychological perspectives on the self
Suls, J. M., & Greenwald, A. G. (1982) · Lawrence Erlbaum Associates eBooks · Cited by 2,300
Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self.
Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.91 · Cited by 1,694
Social comparison : contemporary theory and research
Suls, J. M., & Wills, T. A. (1991) · Cited by 1,381
Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts.
Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.569 · Cited by 1,352
Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.
Pettigrew, T. F., Suls, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1979) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066199 · Cited by 1,164
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Relative Deprivation: A Theoretical and Meta-Analytic Review
Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868311430825 · Cited by 1,255
Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field
Buunk, A. P., & Gibbons, F. X. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.007 · Cited by 1,020
Self-citationLiao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. C. H. (2010) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.54533207 · Cited by 671
Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K., O’Mara-Eves, A., & Craven, R. G. (2008) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6 · Cited by 467
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00019-2 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Blanton, H., Buunk, B. P., Gibbons, F. X., & Kuyper, H.
- Affiliations
- University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 420-430
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1966856360
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
- Keywords
- upward social comparison, social comparison theory, self-enhancement, academic performance, comparative analysis, self-concept, high school students, first-year students, longitudinal prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
