Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes.
Abstract
People prefer to make changeable decisions rather than unchangeable decisions because they do not realize that they may be more satisfied with the latter. Photography students believed that having the opportunity to change their minds about which prints to keep would not influence their liking of the prints. However, those who had the opportunity to change their minds liked their prints less than those who did not (Study 1). Although the opportunity to change their minds impaired the postdecisional processes that normally promote satisfaction (Study 2a), most participants wanted to have that opportunity (Study 2b). The results demonstrate that errors in affective forecasting can lead people to behave in ways that do not optimize their happiness and well-being.
Cites (11)
- A Theory of Cognitive DissonanceFestinger, Leon · 1957
- The case for motivated reasoning.Kunda, Ziva · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
- REMEMBERING: A STUDY IN EXPERIMENTAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGYBartlett, F. C., Burt, Cyril · 1933 · British Journal of Educational Psychology
- Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo BiasKahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L, Thaler, Richard H · 1991 · Journal of Economic Perspectives
- The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the SelfSteele, Claude M. · 1988 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase TheoremKahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L., Thaler, Richard H. · 1990 · Journal of Political Economy
- The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history.Greenwald, Anthony G. · 1980 · American Psychologist
- Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom.Schwartz, Barry · 2000 · American Psychologist
- Emotion-based choice.Mellers, Barbara, Schwartz, Alan, Ritov, Ilana · 1999 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- On the confluence of self-esteem maintenance mechanismsTesser, Abraham · 2000 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
Cited by (13)
- Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theoryMercier, Hugo, Sperber, Dan · 2011 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Prospection: experiencing the futureGilbert, Daniel T., Wilson, Timothy D. · 2007 · Science
- Affective Forecasting: Knowing What to WantWilson, Timothy D., Gilbert, Daniel T. · 2005 · Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Happiness in Everyday Life: The Uses of Experience SamplingCsikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, Hunter, Jeremy · 2003 · Journal of Happiness Studies
- Too Much of a Good Thing: The Challenge and Opportunity of the Inverted UGrant, Adam M., Schwartz, Barry · 2011 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.82.4.503
- The paper
- Gilbert, D. T., & Ebert, J. E. J. (2002). Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.4.503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.