Moral hypocrisy: Addressing some alternatives.

Batson, C. Daniel, Thompson, Elizabeth R., Chen, Hubert·2002·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Two studies addressed alternative explanations for 3 pieces of evidence supporting the existence of moral hypocrisy. In Study 1, no support was found for the idea that low salience of social standards accounts for falsifying the result of a coin flip to assign oneself a more desirable task. In Study 2, no support was found for the idea that responses of those who honestly win the flip account for the higher ratings of morality of their action by participants who assign themselves the more desirable task after flipping the coin. Also, no support was found for the idea that responses of those who honestly win the flip account for the inability of personal moral responsibility measures to predict moral action. Instead, results of both studies provided additional evidence of moral hypocrisy.

Cites (2)

  1. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
    Davis, Mark H. · 1983 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy.
    Batson, C. Daniel, Kobrynowicz, Diane, Dinnerstein, Jessica L., Kampf, Hannah C., Wilson, Angela D. · 1997 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 2 references

Cited by (7)

  1. Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness
    Dana, Jason, Weber, Roberto A., Kuang, Jason Xi · 2007 · Economic Theory
  2. Morality and Prosocial Behavior: The Role of Awareness, Responsibility, and Norms in the Norm Activation Model
    De Groot, Judith I. M., Steg, Linda · 2009 · The Journal of Social Psychology
  3. Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do
    Alicke, Mark D., Sedikides, Constantine · 2009 · European Review of Social Psychology
  4. Does moral identity effectively predict moral behavior?: A meta-analysis
    Hertz, Steven G., Krettenauer, Tobias · 2016 · Review of General Psychology
  5. The role of social cognition in emotion
    Olsson, Andreas, Ochsner, Kevin N. · 2008 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences

See all 231

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moral hypocrisy: Addressing some alternatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.83.2.330
The paper
Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., & Chen, H. (2002). Moral hypocrisy: Addressing some alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.2.330

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.