Cited by 317Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEthics in Business and EducationSocial and Intergroup Psychology

In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy.

Batson, C. Daniel, Kobrynowicz, Diane, Dinnerstein, Jessica L., Kampf, Hannah C., Wilson, Angela D.·1997·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1335

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batson, C. D., Kobrynowicz, D., Dinnerstein, J. L., Kampf, H. C., & Wilson, A. D.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1997
Volume
72
Issue
6
Pages
1335-1348
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4297917739
Cited by
317
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 14
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
moral hypocrisy, moral dissonance, self-presentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review