Cited by 1,028Behavioral Health and InterventionsPro-Environmental Behavior and AttitudesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion, and action.

Wood, Wendy, Quinn, Jeffrey M., Kashy, Deborah A.·2002·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

To illustrate the differing thoughts and emotions involved in guiding habitual and nonhabitual behavior, 2 diary studies were conducted in which participants provided hourly reports of their ongoing experiences. When participants were engaged in habitual behavior, defined as behavior that had been performed almost daily in stable contexts, they were likely to think about issues unrelated to their behavior, presumably because they did not have to consciously guide their actions. When engaged in nonhabitual behavior, or actions performed less often or in shifting contexts, participants' thoughts tended to correspond to their behavior, suggesting that thought was necessary to guide action. Furthermore, the self-regulatory benefits of habits were apparent in the lesser feelings of stress associated with habitual than nonhabitual behavior.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1281

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 94 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Barker, 1978, Measures of habitat and behavior output., 229
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.610 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Eagly, 1993, The psychology of attitudes.
  5. 10.1037/0003-066X.43.5.349 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1323 · DOI
  7. Langer, 1989a, Mindfulness.
  8. Leiter, 2001, Burnout and health., 415
  9. Nelson, 2001, Preventive management of work stress: Current themes and future challenges., 349
  10. Raudenbush, 2001, HLM5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling
  11. Wegner, 1996, Mental control., 466

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 999

Metadata

Authors
Wood, W., Quinn, J. M., & Kashy, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2002
Volume
83
Issue
6
Pages
1281-1297
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2099800158
Cited by
1,028
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 149 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 49
FWCI
11.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (1R01MH619000-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
habit, habitual behavior, automaticity, conscious thought, emotions, self-regulation, stress, everyday life, diary study
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Behavior, Emotions, Female, Habits, Humans, Male, Self Disclosure, Students, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review