Cited by 649Cultural Differences and ValuesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being.

Suh, Eunkook M.·2002·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

All individuals have multiple views of themselves. Whereas the consistency among the different aspects of identity is emphasized in Western cultures, the "multiple selves" are often viewed as coexisting realities in East Asian cultures. This research revisits the classic thesis in psychology that identity consistency is a prerequisite condition of psychological well-being. Between individuals (Study 1), people with a more consistent self-view had a more clear self-knowledge, were more assertive, and, most notably, had self-experiences that were less affected by the perspectives of others. Compared with North American participants (Study 2), Koreans viewed themselves more flexibly across situations, and their subjective well-being was less predictable from levels of identity consistency. Also, consistent individuals received positive social evaluations from others in the United States but not in Korea.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1378

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-esteem and identity consistency, both more highly valued in individualistic than collectivistic cultures, relate more strongly to life satisfaction in the former cultures.

    “self-esteem and identity consistency, both more highly valued in individualistic than collectivistic cultures, relate more strongly to life satisfaction in the former cultures”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suh, E. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Suh, Eunkook M.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2002
Volume
83
Issue
6
Pages
1378-1391
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2148475606
Cited by
649
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 39
FWCI
18.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
identity consistency, multiple selves, subjective well-being, self-knowledge, assertiveness, cross-cultural comparison, East Asian culture, social evaluation, self-presentation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Culture, Female, Humans, Korea, Male, Personality Inventory, Pilot Projects, Self Concept, Social Identification, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review