Cited by 21Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup Psychology

Blending in at the cost of losing oneself: dishonest self- disclosure erodes self-concept clarity in social anxiety

Open access
Orr, Elizabeth M.J., Moscovitch, David A.·2015·Journal of Experimental Psychopathology

Abstract

Self-concept clarity helps to promote self-esteem and guide adaptive social behavior. Recent studies have found that people with higher levels of trait social anxiety exhibit significantly diminished levels of self-concept clarity, but the mechanisms that might link higher social anxiety with lower self-concept clarity are untested and unknown. We propose that the relation between social anxiety and self-concept clarity is mediated by dishonest self-disclosure – a self-protective strategy in which one asserts an inauthentic or dishonest opinion to others based on what one believes others wish to hear rather than one's own genuine viewpoint. To test this prediction, we manipulated the honesty of participants' self-disclosures during a social task in the laboratory and measured subsequent changes in self-concept clarity. As hypothesized, dishonest relative to honest self-disclosure led to significantly reduced levels of self-concept clarity, but only amongst participants with higher levels of trait social anxiety. These findings help to elucidate the processes underlying the link between social anxiety and self-concept clarity and provide insight into the costs of adopting an inauthentic façade during interpersonal encounters when social conformity motives become salient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5127/jep.044914

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orr, E. M. J., & Moscovitch, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Orr, Elizabeth M.J.
  • Moscovitch, David A.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychopathology
Published
2015-10
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
278-296
ISSN
2043-8087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2774623980
Cited by
21
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Experimental Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
self-concept clarity, trait social anxiety, self-presentation, self-protection strategies, conformity, self-esteem, authenticity, interpersonal behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review