Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assortative Mating and Marital Quality in Newlyweds: A Couple-Centered Approach.

Luo, Shanhong, Klohnen, Eva C.·2005·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Using a couple-centered approach, the authors examined assortative mating on a broad range of variables in a large (N = 291) sample of newlyweds. Couples showed substantial similarity on attitude-related domains but little on personality-related domains. Similarity was not due to social homogamy or convergence. The authors examined linear and curvilinear effects of spouse similarity on self and observer indicators of marital quality. Results show (a) positive associations between similarity and marital quality for personality-related domains but not for attitude-related domains, (b) that similarity on attachment characteristics were most strongly predictive of satisfaction, (c) robust curvilinear effects for husbands but not for wives, (d) that profile similarity remained a significant predictor of marital quality even when spouses' self-ratings were controlled, and (e) that profile-based similarity indices were better predictors of marital quality than absolute difference scores.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.304

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Acitelli, 1992, Gender differences in relationship awareness and marital satisfaction among young married couples., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 102, 10.1177/0146167292181015 · DOI
  2. Aiken, 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.
  3. Antonucci, 1994, A life-span view of women's social relations., 239
  4. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00927.x · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Berscheid, 1998, Attraction and close relationships., 193
  8. 10.1006/jesp.1997.1347 · DOI
  9. Block, 1978, The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research.
  10. Block, 2002, Personality as an affect-processing system: Toward an integrative theory., 10.4324/9781410602466 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/1467-6494.00049 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00531.x · DOI
  13. Brennan, 1998, Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview., 47
  14. Burnett, 1987, Reflection in personal relationships., 175
  15. 10.1007/BF01076408 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.250 · DOI
  17. Caspi, 1993, Marital assortment and phenotypic convergence: Longitudinal evidence., Social Biology, 40, 48
  18. 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.281 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/h0025248 · DOI
  20. Clark, 1999, Temperament: A new paradigm for trait psychology., 399
  21. Cohen, 1977, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
  22. Costa, 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual.
  23. Costa, 1994, Set like plaster: Evidence for the stability of adult personality., 21, 10.1037/10143-002 · DOI
  24. 10.1037/h0044919 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0146-6402(81)90002-3 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00026.x · DOI
  27. 10.1007/BF01067537 · DOI
  28. 10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.450 · DOI
  29. Funder, 1997, Congruence of others' and self-judgments of personality., 617, 10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50025-1 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00103-3 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00206.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.170 · DOI
  33. Helson, 1998, Affective coloring of personality from young adulthood to midlife., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 241, 10.1177/0146167298243002 · DOI
  34. John, 1999, The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives., 102
  35. Kenny, 1988, The analysis of data from two-person relationships., 57
  36. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00202.x · DOI
  37. 10.2307/2089791 · DOI
  38. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1067 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.211 · DOI
  40. 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.709 · DOI
  41. Klohnen, 1998, Partner selection for personality characteristics: A couple-centered approach., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 268, 10.1177/0146167298243004 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1037/0882-7974.11.3.431 · DOI
  43. 10.2307/348022 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Martin, 1991, Examining personal relationship thinking: The relationship cognition complexity instrument., Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 467, 10.1177/026540759184002 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/BF01260934 · DOI
  46. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.563 · DOI
  47. 10.2307/351824 · DOI
  48. Pinney, 1987, The Pinney Sexual Satisfaction Inventory., Journal of Sex Research, 23, 233, 10.1080/00224498709551359 · DOI
  49. Reis, 2002, Finding the person in personal relationships., Journal of Personality, 70, 813, 10.1111/1467-6494.05025 · DOI
  50. 10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.251 · DOI
  51. 10.1037/0003-066X.44.5.775 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/0191-8869(91)90057-I · DOI
  53. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.878 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00181-X · DOI
  55. Watson, 1993, Behavioral disinhibition versus constraint: A dispositional perspective., 506
  56. 10.1111/1467-6494.00102 · DOI
  57. 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00289.x · DOI · Paper page
  58. Winch, 1958, Mate selection.

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2005
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
304-326
ISSN
  • 1939-1315
  • 0022-3514
Cited by
388
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assortative Mating and Marital Quality in Newlyweds: A Couple-Centered Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.304
The paper
Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative Mating and Marital Quality in Newlyweds: A Couple-Centered Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.304

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.