Cited by 569Education, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsPsychological Testing and Assessment

The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework.

Cury, François, Elliot, Andrew J., Da Fonseca, David, Moller, Arlen C.·2006·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Two studies examined hypotheses drawn from a proposed modification of the social-cognitive model of achievement motivation that centered on the 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Implicit theories of ability were shown to be direct predictors of performance attainment and intrinsic motivation, and the goals of the 2 x 2 framework were shown to account for these direct relations. Perceived competence was shown to be a direct predictor of achievement goals, not a moderator of relations implicit theory or achievement goal effects. The results highlight the utility of attending to the approach-avoidance distinction in conceptual models of achievement motivation and are fully in line with the hierarchical model of achievement motivation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.666

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Moller and Elliot, citing the failure of Cury et al. to find a moderating role of perceived competence in the achievement goal to performance relationship, tended to favor the potential of perceived competence to act as an antecedent of achievement goal orientation.

    “more recently, Moller and Elliot (2006), citing the failure of Cury, Elliot, Da Fonseca, and Moller (2006) to find a moderating role of perceived competence in the achievement goal to performance relationship, tended to favor the potential of perceived competence to act as an antecedent of achievement goal orientation in studying.”

    From Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. (2011) · cites this paper as Cury, Elliot, Da Fonseca, and Moller, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Rochester (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2006
Volume
90
Issue
4
Pages
666-679
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W1991314098
Cited by
569
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 37
FWCI
33.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Conseil General des bouches du Rhones
  • Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  • William T. Grant Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
achievement motivation, social cognitive model, implicit theories of intelligence, intrinsic motivation, perceived competence, achievement goals, approach-avoidance goals
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Aptitude, Child, Female, France, Goals, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Mathematics, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Psychology, Social, Regression Analysis, Self Concept, Students, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review