Cited by 171Education, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsMathematics Education and Pedagogy

The reciprocal relations between self-concept, motivation and achievement: juxtaposing academic self-concept and achievement goal orientations for mathematics success

Seaton, Marjorie, Parker, Philip, Marsh, Herbert W., Craven, Rhonda G., Yeung, Alexander Seeshing·2014·Educational Psychology

Abstract

Research suggests that motivated students and those with high academic self-concepts perform better academically. Although substantial evidence supports a reciprocal relation between academic self-concept and achievement, there is less evidence supporting a similar relation between achievement goal orientations and achievement. There is also a paucity of research testing the longitudinal relations between achievement goal orientations and academic self-concept with achievement. The present investigation aimed to contribute to addressing these limitations. The sample consisted of 2786 Australian high school students (ages 11–17) measured at four time waves six months apart. Separate models indicated reciprocal relations between mathematics self-concept and achievement and mathematics performance approach goal orientation and achievement. There was little evidence of reciprocal relations between a mastery approach goal orientation and achievement. Juxtaposing the variables, when all were included in a single model, only self-concept had significant reciprocal relationships with achievement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01443410.2013.825232

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much empirical research on motivation-achievement interactions operationalizes motivation as academic self-concept in a certain academic domain, most often in mathematics and verbal subjects such as language and reading.

    “Much empirical research on motivation-achievement interactions operationalizes motivation as ASC in a certain academic domain, most often in mathematics and verbal subjects such as language and reading (Guay et al., 2003;Seaton et al., 2014); for meta-analyses and reviews, see Burnette et al. (2013), Eccles and Wigfield (2002), Marsh and Craven (2006), Marsh and Martin (2011), and Robbins et al. (”

    From Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda (2022) · cites this paper as Seaton et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seaton, M., Parker, P., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Yeung, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • King Saud University (SA)
Corresponding author
Seaton, Marjorie
Venue
Educational Psychology
Published
2013-08-12
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
49-72
ISSN
  • 0144-3410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5820
OpenAlex
W2049835284
Cited by
171
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4
FWCI
11.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
academic self-concept, achievement goal orientation, mathematics achievement, mathematics self-concept, mastery orientation, motivation, bidirectional relationship, high school students, longitudinal associations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review