The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transcending the "Here": The Effect of Spatial Distance on Social Judgment.
Abstract
Construal level theory proposes that increasing the reported spatial distance of events produces judgments that reflect abstract, schematic representations of the events. Across 4 experiments, the authors examined the impact of spatial distance on construal-dependent social judgments. Participants structured behavior into fewer, broader units (Study 1) and increasingly attributed behavior to enduring dispositions rather than situational constraints (Study 2) when the behavior was spatially distant rather than near. Participants reported that typical events were more likely and atypical events less likely when events were more spatially distant (Study 3). They were also less likely to extrapolate from specific cases that deviated from general trends when making predictions about more spatially distant events (Study 4). Implications for social judgment are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 · Cited by 4,479 · cited 2×
“Research has shown that schemas allow individuals to organize or “chunk” information about objects and events into consistent, meaningful, discernible units ( Chase & Simon, 1973; Reitman, 1976).”
An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416950 · Cited by 3,340
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21 · Cited by 1,897
What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior.
Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.1.3 · Cited by 1,802
Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0 · Cited by 1,783 · cited 1×
“To test this hypothesis, we used a variation of the Jones and Harris (1967) attitude attribution paradigm.”
MethodRoss, M., & Wilson, A. E. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.792 · Cited by 348
Cited by
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0018963 · Cited by 6,618
Self-citationTrope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/s1057-7408(07)70013-x · Cited by 1,772
Self-citationLi, J. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.01.001 · Cited by 652
Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task.
Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Algom, D. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.610 · Cited by 351
Self-citationInfluencing attitudes toward near and distant objects
Fujita, K., Eyal, T., Chaiken, S., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.005 · Cited by 287
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Henderson, M. D., Fujita, K., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 845-856
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2157675361
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 5.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
