CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,068Personality Traits and PsychologyGrit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores.

Noftle, Erik E., Robins, Richard W.·2007·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The authors examined relations between the Big Five personality traits and academic outcomes, specifically SAT scores and grade-point average (GPA). Openness was the strongest predictor of SAT verbal scores, and Conscientiousness was the strongest predictor of both high school and college GPA. These relations replicated across 4 independent samples and across 4 different personality inventories. Further analyses showed that Conscientiousness predicted college GPA, even after controlling for high school GPA and SAT scores, and that the relation between Conscientiousness and college GPA was mediated, both concurrently and longitudinally, by increased academic effort and higher levels of perceived academic ability. The relation between Openness and SAT verbal scores was independent of academic achievement and was mediated, both concurrently and longitudinally, by perceived verbal intelligence. Together, these findings show that personality traits have independent and incremental effects on academic outcomes, even after controlling for traditional predictors of those outcomes. ((c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 93 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 999

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
ORCID
Robins, Richard W.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2007-07
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
116-130
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116
OpenAlex
W2143773402
Cited by
1,068
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 49
FWCI
27.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-20006)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG022057-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, conscientiousness, openness to experience, academic performance, grade point average, SAT scores, academic effort, mediation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aptitude Tests, Character, Educational Measurement, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review