Cited by 341Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesStress Responses and CortisolStudent Stress and Coping

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cutting stress off at the pass: reducing vigilance and responsiveness to social threat by manipulating attention

Abstract

Personality processes relating to social perception have been shown to play a significant role in the experience of stress. In 5 studies, the authors demonstrate that early stage attentional processes influence the perception of social threat and modify the human stress response. The authors first show that cortisol release in response to a stressful situation correlates with selective attention toward social threat. Second, the authors show in 2 laboratory studies that this attentional pattern, most evident among individuals with low self-esteem, can be modified with a repetitive training task. Next, in a field study, students trained to modify their attentional pattern to reduce vigilance for social threat showed lower self-reported stress related to their final exam. In a final field study with telemarketers, the attentional training task led to increased self-esteem, decreased cortisol and perceived stress responses, higher confidence, and greater work performance. Taken together, these results demonstrate the impact of antecedent-focused strategies on the late-stage consequences of social stress.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.651

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Dandeneau, S. D., Baldwin, M. W., Baccus, J. R., Sakellaropoulo, M., & Pruessner, J. C.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2007
Volume
93
Issue
4
Pages
651-666
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2117995875
Cited by
341
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 30
FWCI
21.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • La Fondation Baxter et Alma Ricard
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (67071)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
social danger, attentional bias, stress response, cortisol, self-esteem, attention training, sustained attention, perceived stress, exam stress, telemarketers, employee performance, confidence, social perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Attention, Brain, Facial Expression, Female, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Internal-External Control, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Rejection, Psychology, Self Concept, Set, Psychology, Social Perception, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review