The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Together or apart: When goals and temptations complement versus compete.
Abstract
This research examined how the presentation of items related to goals and temptations influences the dynamic of self-regulation, as reflected in evaluation and choice. The authors found that when items, such as healthy and unhealthy foods or academic and leisure activities, are presented together in a unified choice set (e.g., in 1 image) and seem to complement each other, people express a positive evaluation of and a preference for tempting items. Conversely, when the items are presented apart from each other in 2 choice sets (e.g., 2 images) and seem to compete with each other, people express a positive evaluation of and preference for goal items.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“self-control can also be hampered by situational factors, especially when the costs of indulging in temptation are blurred, and rational and slow decision making is prevented (Shefrin and Thaler, 1981; Fishbach and Zhang, 2008).”
From Motivational and Affective Factors Underlying Consumer Dropout and Transactional Success in eCommerce: An Overview (2020) · cites this paper as Fishbach and Zhang, 2008
Citations
Cites
Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.493 · Cited by 5,478
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241 · cited 1×
“In a highlighting dynamic, a particular goal-congruent choice is interpreted as a commitment to that goal, and the choice increases the goal’s priority over competing temptations (Aronson, 1997; Atkinson & Raynor, 1978; Bem, 1972; Feather, 1990; Festinger, 1957; Locke & Latham, 1990).”
BackgroundSelf-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?
Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247 · Cited by 4,510
The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
Steele, C. M. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60229-4 · Cited by 3,697
Delay of gratification in children.
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2658056 · Cited by 3,397
A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.1.3 · Cited by 2,931
Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.
Ainslie, G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076860 · Cited by 2,708
Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior
Loewenstein, G. (1996) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0028 · Cited by 2,610 · cited 3×
“These multiple goals pose a self-control dilemma when one goal is high order and offers delayed but larger benefits, while another goal is low order and offers immediate but smaller benefits (Ainslie, 1992; Baumeister, Heatherton, & Tice, 1994; Kivetz & Simonson, 2002; Loewenstein, 1996; Metcalfe & Mischel, 1999; Rach…”
BackgroundKruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W. Y., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2002) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80008-9 · Cited by 1,386
Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice.
Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33 · Cited by 1,086 · cited 2×
“…against competing desires (e.g., Shah, Friedman, & Kruglanski, 2002), in a dynamic of balancing, the presence of goal cues can have the opposite effect, liberating one to pursue desires or temptations in the present and incurring self-control failure (see also Monin & Miller, 2001; Steele, 1988).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How positive and negative feedback motivate goal pursuit.
Fishbach, A., Eyal, T., & Finkelstein, S. R. (2010) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00285.x · Cited by 304
Self-citationChanging Behavior Using the Model of Action Phases
Keller, L., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2020) · The Handbook of Behavior Change · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.006 · Cited by 147
Bell, L., McCloy, R., Butler, L., & Vogt, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01546 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Fishbach, A., & Zhang, Y.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- ORCID
- Zhang, Ying
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 547-559
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2109648144
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 12.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
- Keywords
- self-regulation, temptation, goal pursuit, dual-process decision making
- MeSH terms
- Association Learning, Choice Behavior, Conflict, Psychological, Decision Making, Female, Food Preferences, Goals, Humans, Male, Motivation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reinforcement, Psychology, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
