The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations.
Abstract
Mise au point sur les explications de certains biais lies aux recherches sur la formation des impressions, et presentation d'un modele fonde sur des indices de categorisation du stimulus pour rendre compte de tels biais
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315807102 · Cited by 4,211
(2002) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3080.003.0017 · Cited by 3,974
From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0 · Cited by 3,424
Rosch, E. H., & Lloyd, B. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781032633275 · Cited by 2,869
The role of theories in conceptual coherence.
Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.92.3.289 · Cited by 2,805
Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674866270 · Cited by 2,653
Parducci, A., & Helson, H. (1965) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421107 · Cited by 2,493
Foundations of Information Integration Theory
Carroll, J. S., & Anderson, N. H. (1982) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422202 · Cited by 2,105
Kintsch, W. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,051
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 · Cited by 7,678
“The negative focus was first documented by Carlson's (1966) survey of psychology textbooks, in which he found twice as many chapters (121 vs. 52) devoted to unpleasant as to pleasant emotions, and a similar imbalance was found in lines of coverage and use of specific words.”
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 · Cited by 7,364
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0504_2 · Cited by 4,342
“There have been thorough reviews of negative bias in impressions (Baumeister et al., in press; Fiske, 1980; Skowronski & Carlston, 1989), so we will limit our discussion here.”
InfluentialAsymmetrical effects of positive and negative events – the mobilization minimization hypothesis.
Taylor, S. E. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.110.1.67 · Cited by 2,387
“A wide variety of research has suggested that negative aspects of an object, event, or choice are weighted more heavily than positive aspects in judgments (Kahneman & Tversky, 1984; see Czapinski & Peeters, 1990; Peeters & Czapinski, 1990; Skowronski & Carlston, 1989, for reviews).”
BackgroundInfluentialMittal, V., & Kamakura, W. A. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.1.131.18832 · Cited by 2,256
Metadata
- Authors
- Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University Newark (US)
- ORCID
- Skowronski, John J.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-142
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W1981706854
- Cited by
- 1,550
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 51
- FWCI
- 48.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- negativity bias, impression formation, stimulus classification, social perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
