The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Suppression situations in psychological research: Definitions, implications, and applications
Abstract
In 1941, Horst noticed that a variable can be totally uncorrelated with the criterion and still improve prediction by virtue of being correlated with other predictors. He christened such vari-ables suppressors, a title that implies that such variables suppress criterion-irrelevant variance in other predictors. During the 50 years that have passed since Horst's original analysis, the concept of suppression has been extended and reanalyzed. What follows provides a general approach to the analysis of suppression situations. This approach is based on coupling the analysis of 3 variate suppression situations with the applications of the concept of suppressor to the general linear model. The implications of the analysis are discussed, and some applications of the concept of suppression are provided. Suppose you are trying to predict the success of high-school students in college. \\bu may ask the students in high school whom they expect to succeed in college. A sociometric score for each student can then be defined and used as a predictor. It seems much less likely that you would decide to include a socio-metric variable based on the question "Who is your best
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Because the direct effect from EI to past-month smoking was negative, the indirect effect through HT can be interpreted as suppression (MacKinnon, Krull, & Lockwood, 2000; Tzelgov & Henik, 1991), resulting in an inconsistent mediation effect.”
From Stressful Life Events, Ethnic Identity, Historical Trauma, and Participation in Cultural Activities: Associations with Smoking Behaviors among American Indian Adolescents in California (2015) · cites this paper as Tzelgov & Henik, 1991
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores
Rozeboom, W. W., Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R., & Birnbaum, A. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162101 · Cited by 8,022
(1982) · Cited by 3,737
Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031564 · Cited by 3,073
Kintsch, W. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,049
Multiple regression in psychological research and practice.
Darlington, R. B. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0025471 · Cited by 1,132
Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences.
Elliott, G. C., Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedeck, S. (1982) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2067145 · Cited by 1,011
A Revised Definition for Suppressor Variables: a Guide To Their Identification and Interpretation
Conger, A. J. (1974) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447403400105 · Cited by 702
Neely, J. H. (1976) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03213230 · Cited by 521
Balota, D. A., & Lorch, R. F. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.12.3.336 · Cited by 398
de Groot, A. M. B. (1984) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640748408402158 · Cited by 314
Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior, self-, and peer ratings.
Holzbach, R. L. (1978) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.5.579 · Cited by 249
McFatter, R. M. (1979) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167900300113 · Cited by 115
Sentence frame contexts and lexical decisions: Sentence-acceptability and word-relatedness effects
Kleiman, G. M. (1980) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03198273 · Cited by 102
Statistical control of halo error in performance ratings.
Landy, F. J., Vance, R. J., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Steele, J. W. (1980) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.65.5.501 · Cited by 87
Suppressor Variables, Prediction, and the interpretation of Psychological Relationships
Conger, A. J., & Jackson, D. N. (1972) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447203200303 · Cited by 86
Suppressor Variables and the Semipartial Correlation Coefficient
Velicer, W. F. (1978) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447803800415 · Cited by 86
Difficulties in the statistical control of halo.
Murphy, K. R. (1982) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.67.2.161 · Cited by 65
Response set as a suppressor variable in the OAIS and MMPI.
Fricke, B. G. (1956) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040063 · Cited by 51
Some Formulae for Use With Suppressor Variables
Lubin, A. (1957) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316445701700209 · Cited by 43
Relationships Between Variables in Three Variable Linear Regression and the Concept of Suppressor
Tzelgov, J., & Stern, I. (1978) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447803800213 · Cited by 38
Self-citationCorrelates of Psychological Hardiness in Canadian Adolescents
Hannah, T. E., & Morrissey, C. (1987) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1987.9713713 · Cited by 37
A Simple Algebraic Development of Horst's Suppressor Variables
Meehl, P. E. (1945) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1417770 · Cited by 31
Suppressor Structures in the General Linear Model
Holling, H. (1983) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316448304300101 · Cited by 23
Control of halo error: A multiple regression approach.
Henik, A., & Tzelgov, J. (1985) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.577 · Cited by 19
Self-citationOpen Communication as an Effective Stress Management Method for Breast Cancer Patients
Orr, E. (1986) · Journal of Human Stress · doi:10.1080/0097840x.1986.9936785 · Cited by 19
A Definition of Suppression Situations for the General Linear Model: A Regression Weights Approach
Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (1985) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316448504500211 · Cited by 16
Self-citationGoldberg, L. R., Rorer, L. G., & Greene, M. M. (1970) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e301622005-001 · Cited by 9
A New Method for the Statistical Control of Rating Error in Performance Ratings
Bannister, B. D., Kinicki, A. J., DeNisi, A. S., & Hom, P. W. (1987) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316448704700305 · Cited by 8
On the Differences Between Conger's and Velicer's Definitions of Suppressor
Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (1981) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316448104100411 · Cited by 7
Self-citationGRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE EFFECTS OF MULTICOLLINEARITY
Weber, J. E., & Monarchi, D. E. (1977) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1977.tb01100.x · Cited by 4
Comments on Two Statements about Three-Variate Multiple Regression
Stern, I., & Tzelgov, J. (1978) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1978.43.3.687 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Cited by
Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/651257 · Cited by 12,583
Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422 · Cited by 11,335
Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1023/a:1026595011371 · Cited by 4,188
Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428107300343 · Cited by 1,965
Akinwande, M. O., Dikko, H. G., & Samson, A. (2015) · Open Journal of Statistics · doi:10.4236/ojs.2015.57075 · Cited by 1,534
Metadata
- Authors
- Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 524-536
- ISSN
- 1939-1455
- 0033-2909
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 32
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.