The DOI matches its Crossref record; 288 of the 294 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer.
Abstract
Most academic psychologists do not yet accept the existence of psi, anomalous processes of information or energy transfer (such as telepathy or other forms of extrasensory perception) that are currently unexplained in terms of known physical or biological mechanisms. We believe that the replication rates and effect sizes achieved by one particular experimental method, the ganzfeld procedure, are now sufficient to warrant bringing this body of data to the attention of the wider psychological community. Competing meta-analyses of the ganzfeld database are reviewed, 1 by R. Hyman (1985), a skeptical critic of psi research, and the other by C. Honorton (1985), a parapsychologist and major contributor to the ganzfeld database. Next the results of 11 new ganzfeld studies that comply with guidelines jointly authored by R. Hyman and C. Honorton (1986) are summarized. Finally, issues of replication and theoretical explanation are discussed. The term psi denotes anomalous processes of information or energy transfer, processes such as telepathy or other forms of extrasensory perception that are currently unexplained in terms of known physical or biological mechanisms. The term is purely descriptive: It neither implies that such anomalous phenomena are paranormal nor connotes anything about their underlying mechanisms. Does psi exist? Most academic psychologists don't think so. A survey of more than 1,100 college professors in the United States found that 55% of natural scientists, 66% of social scientists (excluding psychologists), and 77% of academics in the arts, humanities, and education believed that ESP is either an established fact or a likely possibility. The comparable figure for psy
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bem and Honorton (1994) found, as predicted, that the hit rate was significantly higher for dynamic than static targets (37% and 27% respectively, where MCE = 25%).”
From On the correspondence between dream content and target material under laboratory conditions: A meta-analysis of dream-ESP studies, 1966-2016 (2017) · cites this paper as Bem and Honorton (1994)
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · Cited by 50,387
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,279
An introduction to probability theory and its applications
(1958) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(58)90688-4 · Cited by 29,621
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
Naegele, K. D., & Goffman, E. (1956) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089106 · Cited by 26,049
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences
Schmidt, S. (2009) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015108 · Cited by 1,125
Bem, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021524 · Cited by 893
Self-citationThe actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis.
Malle, B. F. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.895 · Cited by 486
Psychobiology of Altered States of Consciousness.
Vaitl, D., Birbaumer, N., Gruzelier, J., Jamieson, G. A., Kotchoubey, B., Kübler, A., Lehmann, D., Miltner, W. H. R., Ott, U., Pütz, P., et al. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.98 · Cited by 448
BIASES IN THE INTERPRETATION AND USE OF RESEARCH RESULTS
MacCoun, R. J. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.259 · Cited by 436
Theory Construction Methodology: A Practical Framework for Building Theories in Psychology
Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. D. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620969647 · Cited by 384
The temporal pattern to the experience of regret.
Gilovich, T. D., & Medvec, V. H. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.357 · Cited by 373
Ethnic Minority Scholars, Research, and Mentoring: Current and Future Issues
Padilla, A. M. (1994) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.2307/1176259 · Cited by 339
Ferguson, C. J. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.11.002 · Cited by 295
Writing a review article for Psychological Bulletin.
Bem, D. J. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.172 · Cited by 245
Self-citationPeer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1
Campanario, J. M. (1998) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547098019003002 · Cited by 200
Does Batterer Treatment Reduce Violence?
Davis, R. C., & Taylor, B. G. (1999) · Women & Criminal Justice · doi:10.1300/j012v10n02_05 · Cited by 172
‘Does Religion Cause Health?’: Differing Interpretations and Diverse Meanings
Oman, D., & Thoresen, C. E. (2002) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105302007004326 · Cited by 151
Predictive Physiological Anticipation Preceding Seemingly Unpredictable Stimuli: A Meta-Analysis
Mossbridge, J., Tressoldi, P. E., & Utts, J. M. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00390 · Cited by 171
Does psi exist? Lack of replication of an anomalous process of information transfer.
Milton, J., & Wiseman, R. J. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.4.387 · Cited by 144
Bösch, H., Steinkamp, F., & Boller, E. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.4.497 · Cited by 141
Storm, L., Tressoldi, P. E., & Di Risio, L. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0019457 · Cited by 140
Ganzfeld-induced hallucinatory experience, its phenomenology and cerebral electrophysiology
Wackermann, J., PUTZ, P., & Allefeld, C. (2008) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.05.003 · Cited by 124
Testing vs. believing hypotheses: magical ideation in the judgement of contingencies
Brugger, P., & Graves, R. E. (1997) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/135468097396270 · Cited by 117
Transliminality, the Mental Experience Inventory and tolerance of ambiguity
Thalbourne, M. A., & Houran, J. (2000) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00143-9 · Cited by 109
Subbotsky, E. V. (2004) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1348/026151004772901140 · Cited by 110
Magic of signs: a non-local interpretation of homeopathy
Walach, H. (2000) · British Homeopathic journal · doi:10.1038/sj.bhj.5800413 · Cited by 87
Ferguson, C. J. (2009) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015103 · Cited by 80
Anomalous Information Reception by Research Mediums Demonstrated Using a Novel Triple-Blind Protocol
Beischel, J., & SCHWARTZ, G. E. R. (2007) · EXPLORE · doi:10.1016/j.explore.2006.10.004 · Cited by 80
An Assessment of the Evidence for Psychic Functioning
Utts, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Parapsychology · doi:10.30891/jopar.2018s.01.10 · Cited by 83
Do cultural factors affect causal beliefs? Rational and magical thinking in Britain and Mexico
Subbotsky, E. V., & Quinteros, G. (2002) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712602761381385 · Cited by 76
Newman, L. S., & Baumeister, R. F. (1996) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0702_1 · Cited by 76
Updating the ganzfeld database: A victim of its own success?
Daryl, J., Palmer, J. A., & Broughton, R. S. (2001) · Cited by 71
Bradley, B. S. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511489921 · Cited by 63
Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychologyPreprint
Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. D. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8 · Cited by 63
Wackermann, J., Pütz, P., Büchi, S., Strauch, I., & Lehmann, D. (2002) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(02)00070-3 · Cited by 61
Leakproofing the Singularity: Artificial Intelligence Confinement Problem
Yampolskiy, R. V. (2012) · Cited by 60
Is psychological science a-cultural?
Gone, J. P. (2011) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023805 · Cited by 64
DECISION AUGMENTATION THEORY: TOWARD A MODEL OF ANOMALOUS MENTAL PHENOMENA
May, E. C., Utts, J. M., & Spottiswoode, S. J. P. (1995) · Journal of Parapsychology · Cited by 59
Wahbeh, H., Radin, D. I., Cannard, C., & Arnaud Delorme, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.955594 · Cited by 76
Uncanny Communication and the Porous Mind
de Peyer, J. (2016) · Psychoanalytic Dialogues · doi:10.1080/10481885.2016.1144978 · Cited by 60
Investigating the personality correlates of paranormal belief and precognitive experience
Rattet, S. L., & Bursik, K. (2001) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00148-3 · Cited by 58
Detecting Psychological Phenomena: Taking Bottom-Up Research Seriously
Haig, B. D. (2013) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.2.0135 · Cited by 67
Hyland, M. (2005) · Clinical medicine (London) · doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.5-4-361 · Cited by 53
Paranormal experiences, mental health and mental boundaries, and psi
Rabeyron, T., & Watt, C. A. (2009) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.029 · Cited by 54
Does psi exist? Comments on Milton and Wiseman's (1999) meta-analysis of Ganzfield research.
Storm, L., & Ertel, S. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.424 · Cited by 52
An Investigation of Mediums Who Claim to Give Information About Deceased Persons
Kelly, E. W., & Arcangel, D. (2011) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0b013e31820439da · Cited by 48
Bem, D. J. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807862.002 · Cited by 47
Self-citationClinique des expériences exceptionnelles : du trauma à la solution paranormale
Rabeyron, T., Chouvier, B., & Maléfan, P. L. (2010) · L Évolution Psychiatrique · doi:10.1016/j.evopsy.2010.09.004 · Cited by 47
Alterations of Consciousness: An Empirical Analysis for Social Scientists
Barušs, I. (2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1233 · Cited by 59
Boundaries in the mind: Past research and future directions.
Hartmann, E. L., Harrison, R. H., & Zborowski, M. J. (2001) · North American journal of psychology · Cited by 46
Statistical Significance and Replicability
Sohn, D. A. (1998) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354398083001 · Cited by 47
On “Telepathic Dreams?”: an Unpublished Paper By Robert J. Stoller
Mayer, E. L. (2001) · Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association · doi:10.1177/00030651010490021201 · Cited by 45
Nonlocality, Intention, and Observer Effects in Healing Studies: Laying a Foundation for the Future
Schwartz, S. A., & Dossey, L. (2010) · EXPLORE · doi:10.1016/j.explore.2010.06.011 · Cited by 44
Complementarity is a useful concept for consciousness studies. A Reminder.
Walach, H., & Römer, H. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 44
Rabeyron, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562992 · Cited by 48
Contemporary methods used in Laboratory-based mediumship researCh
Beischel, J. (2007) · Journal of Parapsychology · Cited by 38
The Teaching of Courses in the Science and Pseudoscience of Psychology: Useful Resources
Lilienfeld, S. O., Lohr, J. M., & Morier, D. M. (2001) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15328023top2803_03 · Cited by 40
Schmidt, T. T., & Prein, J. C. (2019) · PsyCh Journal · doi:10.1002/pchj.262 · Cited by 45
Quantum aspects of the brain-mind relationship: A hypothesis with supporting evidence
Kauffman, S. A., & Radin, D. I. (2022) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2022.104820 · Cited by 42
ESP: extrasensory perception or effect of subjective probability?
Brugger, P., & Taylor, K. I. (2003) · Cited by 38
Anomalous experiences, psi and functional neuroimaging
Acunzo, D. J., Évrard, R., & Rabeyron, T. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00893 · Cited by 40
Using Neuroimaging to Resolve the Psi Debate
Moulton, S. T., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20009 · Cited by 36
Curiosity and exploratory behaviour towards possible and impossible events in children and adults
Subbotsky, E. V. (2009) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712609x470590 · Cited by 35
Telepathic Entanglements: Where are we Today? Commentary on Paper by Claudie Massicotte
de Peyer, J. (2014) · Psychoanalytic Dialogues · doi:10.1080/10481885.2014.870842 · Cited by 35
Contemporary Approaches to Meta-Analysis in Communication Research
Johnson, B. T., Scott‐Sheldon, L. A. J., Snyder, L. B., Noar, S. M., & Huedo-Medina, T. B. (2008) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452272054.n11 · Cited by 39
Hyland, M. E. (2004) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2004.10.002 · Cited by 35
A Modular Model of Mind/Matter Manifestations (M5)
Jahn, R. G., & Dunne, B. J. (2007) · EXPLORE · doi:10.1016/j.explore.2007.03.023 · Cited by 34
Armstrong, J. S., & Pagell, R. A. (2003) · INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics · doi:10.1287/inte.33.6.91.25180 · Cited by 34
Storm, L., Sherwood, S. J., Roe, C. A., Tressoldi, P. E., Rock, A. J., & Di Risio, L. (2017) · International Journal of Dream Research · doi:10.11588/ijodr.2017.2.34888 · Cited by 29
“However, in the Ganzfeld domain, Bem and Honorton (1994) found, as predicted, that the hit rate was significantly higher for dynamic than static targets (37% and 27% respectively, where MCE = 25%).”
Meta-analysis that conceals more than it reveals: Comment on Storm et al. (2010).
Hyman, R. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0019676 · Cited by 31
Anomaly or artifact? Comments on Bem and Honorton.
Hyman, R. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.115.1.19 · Cited by 31
Why Is PSI So Elusive? A Review and Proposed Model
Kennedy, J. E. (2001) · Cited by 31
Researching alternative medicine
Jonas, W. B. (1997) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0897-824 · Cited by 31
Walach, H., & Schmidt, S. (2005) · Journal of Consciousness Studies · Cited by 31
A review of dream ESP studies conducted since the Maimonides dream ESP programme
Sherwood, S. J., & Roe, C. A. (2003) · Cited by 30
Hallucinations That Comfort: Contextual Mediation of Deathbed Visions
Houran, J., & Lange, R. (1997) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1997.84.3c.1491 · Cited by 30
Baptista, J., Derakhshani, M., Tressoldi, P. E., Cardeña, E., Palmer, J. A., & Eds, D. M.-C. (2014) · Cited by 29
Coincidences: A fundamental consequence of rational cognition
Johansen, M. K., & Osman, M. (2015) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.07.001 · Cited by 29
Of two minds: Sceptic‐proponent collaboration within parapsychology
Schlitz, M. J., Wiseman, R. J., Watt, C. A., & Radin, D. I. (2006) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712605x80704 · Cited by 37
Information Seeking and Interest in the Paranormal: Towards a Process Model of Information Action
Kari, J. (2001) · Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) · Cited by 28
Bierman, D. J., Spottiswoode, J., & Aron, B. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153049 · Cited by 32
50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology
Sitzman, D. M., & Rhodes, M. G. (2011) · Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines · doi:10.5840/inquiryctnews201126222 · Cited by 27
Dossey, L. (2000) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.160.12.1735 · Cited by 27
REFLECTIONS ON BIASED ASSIMILATION AND BELIEF POLARIZATION
Ross, L. D. (2012) · Critical Review · doi:10.1080/08913811.2012.711025 · Cited by 26
An Assessment of the Evidence for Psychic Functioning
Utts, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Parapsychology · doi:10.30891/jopar.2018.03.10 · Cited by 23
What's Wrong with Research Literatures? And how to Make Them Right
Howard, G. S., Hill, T. L., Maxwell, S. E., Baptista, T. M., Farias, M., Coelho, C., Coulter-Kern, M., & Coulter-Kern, R. (2009) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015319 · Cited by 23
How to critique a published article.
Hyman, R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.118.2.178 · Cited by 22
Do Research Literatures Give Correct Answers?
Howard, G. S., Lau, M. Y., Maxwell, S. E., Venter, A., Lundy, R., & Sweeny, R. M. (2009) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015468 · Cited by 21
Revisiting the Ganzfeld ESP Debate: A Basic Review and Assessment
Williams, B. J. (2011) · Journal of Scientific Exploration · Cited by 21
A meta-analysis with nothing to hide: Reply to Hyman (2010).
Storm, L., Tressoldi, P. E., & Risio, L. D. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0019840 · Cited by 21
Arguing for an Observational Theory of Paranormal Phenomena
Houtkooper, J. M. (2002) · Cited by 21
Towards a Discursive Parapsychology
Wooffitt, R., & Allistone, S. (2005) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354305053218 · Cited by 20
A REVIEW OF THE GANZFELD WORK AT GOTHENBURG UNIVERSITY
Parker, A. (2000) · Cited by 20
Interpreting the Anomalous: Finding Meaning in Out-of-Body and Near-Death Experiences
Wilde, D., & Murray, C. (2010) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780880903304550 · Cited by 27
TESTING FOR TELEPATHY IN CONNECTION WITH E-MAILS
Sheldrake, R., & Smart, P. (2005) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.101.3.771-786 · Cited by 19
The speed of thought: Investigation of a complex space-time metric to describe psychic phenomena
RAUSCHER, E. A., Targ, R., & Schrödinger, E. (2014) · Cited by 19
First Sight: Part Two, Elaboration of a Model of Psi and the Mind
Carpenter, J. C. (2005) · Journal of Parapsychology · Cited by 18
Entertaining without endorsing: The case for the scientific investigation of anomalous cognition.
Schooler, J. W., Baumgart, S., & Franklin, M. S. (2018) · Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/cns0000151 · Cited by 20
Espejo, R. (2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17
Target and Sender Dependencies in Anomalous Cognition Experiments
Lantz, N. D., Luke, W. L. W., & May, E. C. (1994) · Journal of Parapsychology · Cited by 16
At Play in the Fields of the Mind: Personal Myths as Fields of Information
Feinstein, D. L. (1998) · Journal of Humanistic Psychology · doi:10.1177/00221678980383004 · Cited by 16
Psychoanalysis and Telepathic Processes
Rabeyron, T., Évrard, R., & Massicotte, C. (2021) · Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association · doi:10.1177/00030651211022332 · Cited by 16
Paranormal Beliefs and Religiosity: Chinese Version of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale
Shiah, Y., Wu, M.-H., Tam, W. C., & Chang, F. (2010) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/08.09.17.pr0.107.5.367-382 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Bem, D. J., & Honorton, C.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-18
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2104146277
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 294
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 20.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Keywords
- extrasensory perception, telepathy, replication, effect size, parapsychology, meta-analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review