Cited by 893Paranormal Experiences and BeliefsReligious Studies and Spiritual PracticesMemory Processes and Influences

Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect.

Bem, Daryl J.·2011·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The term psi denotes anomalous processes of information or energy transfer that are currently unexplained in terms of known physical or biological mechanisms. Two variants of psi are precognition (conscious cognitive awareness) and premonition (affective apprehension) of a future event that could not otherwise be anticipated through any known inferential process. Precognition and premonition are themselves special cases of a more general phenomenon: the anomalous retroactive influence of some future event on an individual's current responses, whether those responses are conscious or nonconscious, cognitive or affective. This article reports 9 experiments, involving more than 1,000 participants, that test for retroactive influence by "time-reversing" well-established psychological effects so that the individual's responses are obtained before the putatively causal stimulus events occur. Data are presented for 4 time-reversed effects: precognitive approach to erotic stimuli and precognitive avoidance of negative stimuli; retroactive priming; retroactive habituation; and retroactive facilitation of recall. The mean effect size (d) in psi performance across all 9 experiments was 0.22, and all but one of the experiments yielded statistically significant results. The individual-difference variable of stimulus seeking, a component of extraversion, was significantly correlated with psi performance in 5 of the experiments, with participants who scored above the midpoint on a scale of stimulus seeking achieving a mean effect size of 0.43. Skepticism about psi, issues of replication, and theories of psi are also discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0021524

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overstated claims can occasionally accelerate progress, by provoking methodological reform or rapid follow-up work.

    “overstated claims can occasionally accelerate progress, by provoking methodological reform or rapid follow-up work, as in the Cowles Foundation's econometric contributions or the LK-99, ESP and cold-fusion episodes 80-82”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bem, D. J.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Bem, Daryl J.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2011
Volume
100
Issue
3
Pages
407-425
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2118699776
Cited by
893
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 48
FWCI
83.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
extrasensory perception, precognition, premonition, stimulus seeking, extraversion, individual differences, replication
MeSH terms
Affect, Awareness, Boredom, Cognition, Erotica, Escape Reaction, Female, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Male, Parapsychology, Mental Recall, Subliminal Stimulation, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review