Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal.
Abstract
Theory and research on self-monitoring have accumulated into a sizable literature on the impact of variation in the extent to which people cultivate public appearances in diverse domains of social functioning. Yet self-monitoring and its measure, the Self-Monitoring Scale, are surrounded by controversy generated by conflicting answers to the critical question, Is self-monitoring a unitary phenomenon? A primary source of answers to this question has been largely neglected--the Self-Monitoring Scale's relations with external criteria. We propose a quantitative method to examine the self-monitoring literature and thereby address major issues of the controversy. Application of this method reveals that, with important exceptions, a wide range of external criteria tap a dimension directly measured by the Self-Monitoring Scale. We discuss what this appraisal reveals about with self-monitoring is and is not.
Cites (8)
- Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of TestsCronbach, Lee J. · 1951 · Psychometrika
- Society and the Adolescent Self-ImageRosenberg, Morris · 1965
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Campbell, Donald T., Fiske, Donald W. · 1959 · Psychological Bulletin
- Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.McCrae, Robert R., Costa, Paul T. · 1987 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Two-component models of socially desirable responding.Paulhus, Delroy L. · 1984 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations.Zaccaro, Stephen J., Foti, Roseanne J., Kenny, David A. · 1991 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Individual and cultural influences on uncertainty reductionGudykunst, William B., Nishida, Tsukasa · 1984 · Communication Monographs
- Confirmation Bias as a Social SkillDardenne, Benoit, Leyens, Jacques-Philippe · 1995 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Cited by (27)
- The dynamics of proactivity at workGrant, Adam M., Ashford, Susan J. · 2008 · Research in Organizational Behavior
- Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agendaGardner, William L., Cogliser, Claudia C., Davis, Kelly M., Dickens, Matthew P. · 2011 · The Leadership Quarterly
- Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomesIlies, Remus, Morgeson, Frederick P., Nahrgang, Jennifer D. · 2005 · The Leadership Quarterly
- The chameleon effect as social glue: evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicryLakin, Jessica L., Jefferis, Valerie E., Cheng, Clara Michelle, Chartrand, Tanya L. · 2003 · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
- Out of Sight But Not Out of Mind: Managing Invisible Social Identities in the WorkplaceClair, Judith A., Beatty, Joy E., Maclean, Tammy L. · 2005 · Academy of Management Review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.126.4.530
- The paper
- Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.126.4.530
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.