The DOI matches its Crossref record; 193 of the 200 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do Psychosocial and Study Skill Factors Predict College Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis.
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between psychosocial and study skill factors (PSFs) and college outcomes by meta-analyzing 109 studies. On the basis of educational persistence and motivational theory models, the PSFs were categorized into 9 broad constructs: achievement motivation, academic goals, institutional commitment, perceived social support, social involvement, academic self-efficacy, general self-concept, academic-related skills, and contextual influences. Two college outcomes were targeted: performance (cumulative grade point average; GPA) and persistence (retention). Meta-analyses indicate moderate relationships between retention and academic goals, academic self-efficacy, and academic-related skills (ps =.340,.359, and.366, respectively). The best predictors for GPA were academic self-efficacy and achievement motivation (ps =.496 and.303, respectively). Supplementary regression analyses confirmed the incremental contributions of the PSF over and above those of socioeconomic status, standardized achievement, and high school GPA in predicting college outcomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Study skill training programs produce beneficial effects in terms of academic performance and retention (Hattie et al., 1996; Gettinger and Seibert, 2002; Robbins et al., 2004; Wibrowski et al., 2017).”
From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Robbins et al., 2004
In the citing paper
“and with the results of Robbins et al. (2004), where the best predictors for GPA were academic self-efficacy and achievement motivation.”
From A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research (2017) · cites this paper as Robbins et al. (2004)
In the citing paper
“with self-efficacy being a particularly strong predictor of academic performance (Robbins et al., 2004).”
From The rapid rise of generative AI and its implications for academic integrity: Students’ perceptions and use of chatbots for assistance with assessments (2024) · cites this paper as Robbins et al., 2004
In the citing paper
“Communication competencies involve not only the demonstration of specific conversational techniques but also the psychological determinants underlying skill acquisition and performance.”
In the citing paper
“Research in educational psychology indicates that self-efficacy (i.e., confidence in one’s ability to perform a task) and a positive self-concept in a given domain can significantly predict persistence, engagement, and actual skill performance [16].”
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research
Tinto, V. (1975) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170024 · Cited by 7,888
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611
Motivational beliefs, values, and goals
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153 · Cited by 7,587
Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition
Bean, J. P., & Tinto, V. (1988) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/1982243 · Cited by 7,408
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
(1999) · Cited by 6,308
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.124.2.262 · Cited by 4,180
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 1989, Building better study skills: Practical methods for succeeding in college.
- 1997, ACT assessment technical manual.
- Bandura, 1986, Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.
- 10.2307/1162986 · DOI
- Gloria, 1999, African American students' persistence at a predominantly White university: Influence of social support, university comfort, and self-beliefs., Journal of College Student Development, 40, 257
- 10.2307/1170605 · DOI · Paper page
- Jackson, 1984, Personality Research Form manual. Port Huron.
- Noble. 1996 · DOI
- Osher, 1995, The College Adjustment Inventory
- Pintrich, 1989, The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom., Vol. 6, 117
- 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262 · DOI · Paper page
- Tomlinson-Clarke, 1994, A longitudinal study of the relationship between academic comfort, occupational orientation and persistence among African American, Hispanic and White college students., Journal of College Student Development, 35, 25
- Tomlinson-Clarke, 1994, Predicting social adjustment and academic achievement for college women with and without precollege leadership., Journal of College Student Development, 35, 120
- Willingham, 1985, Success in college.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,005 of 1,005
Why Do Achievement Measures Underpredict Female Academic Performance?
Mattern, K., Sanchez, E., & Ndum, E. (2017) · Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/emip.12138 · Cited by 15
DeLaRosby, H. R. (2017) · Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice · doi:10.1177/1521025115611618 · Cited by 18
A 4-year longitudinal study investigating the relationship between flexible school starts and grades
Biller, A. M., Molenda, C., Obster, F., Zerbini, G., Förtsch, C., Roenneberg, T., & Winnebeck, E. C. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-06804-5 · Cited by 10
Hill, K. C., & Metz, A. J. (2023) · Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition · doi:10.65005/154230723837777310
(2013) · Cited by 834
Metadata
- Authors
- Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A.
- Affiliations
- ACT (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 261-288
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2106866721
- Cited by
- 2,479
- References
- 200
- Citations by year
- 2026: 85 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 134 · 2022: 148 · 2021: 153 · 2020: 231 · 2019: 159 · 2018: 168 · 2017: 171 · 2016: 162 · 2015: 164 · 2014: 145 · 2013: 133 · 2012: 107
- FWCI
- 22.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
- Keywords
- psychosocial factors, study skills, college outcomes, academic self-efficacy, achievement motivation, academic goals, student retention, grade point average, institutional commitment, perceived social support, social engagement, self-concept, student performance prediction
- MeSH terms
- Educational Status, Humans, Learning, Psychology, Retention, Psychology, Social Support, Universities, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review