The DOI matches its Crossref record; 290 of the 290 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Dual-Process Theories of the Mind.
Open accessAbstract
Dual-process theories of the mind are ubiquitous in psychology. A central principle of these theories is that behavior is determined by the interplay of automatic and controlled processing. In this article, the authors examine individual differences in the capacity to control attention as a major contributor to differences in working memory capacity (WMC). The authors discuss the enormous implications of this individual difference for a host of dual-process theories in social, personality, cognitive, and clinical psychology. In addition, the authors propose several new areas of investigation that derive directly from applying the concept of WMC to dual-process theories of the mind.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Importantly, executive attention need not be volitional or effortful and can operate well before subjective experience is generated (Barrett et al. 2004).”
From The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review (2012) · cites this paper as Barrett et al. 2004
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Executive attention is the fourth operation that is particular to our psychological constructionist approach (Barrett 2009a; Barrett et al. 2004).”
From The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review (2012) · cites this paper as Barrett et al. 2004
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“WM capacity is closely correlated with other higher-order cognitive functions such as fluid intelligence, abstract reasoning, and reading comprehension [3].”
From Adaptive working memory training does not produce transfer effects in cognition and neuroimaging (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“I am saying that in humans, actual executive control (e.g. via the frontoparietal control network in primates) and the experience of feeling in control are not synonymous (Barrett et al., 2004).”
From The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization (2016) · cites this paper as Barrett et al., 2004
In the citing paper
“These findings align with a dual-process model of emotion regulation with top-down prefrontal controlled processes and bottom-up, automatic limbic activation (Barrett et al., 2004).”
From Meta-analyses of the neural mechanisms and predictors of response to psychotherapy in depression and anxiety (2018) · cites this paper as Barrett et al., 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eysenck, H. J. (1985) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(85)90087-7 · Cited by 32,038
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 1×
“This idea is consistent with the long-held view in social psychology that we are rather limited in our abilities to explain the causes of our behavior, and we cannot take subjective experience as solid evidence for the presence of causal processes (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977).”
ResultA Handbook of Child Psychology
(1932) · Nature · doi:10.1038/130331a0 · Cited by 10,133
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
Jason, G. (1988) · Encyclopedia of Research Design · doi:10.4135/9781412961288.n223 · Cited by 9,743
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
LeDoux, J. E. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155 · Cited by 8,444
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Baddeley, 1986, Working memory.
- Baddeley, 1974, Working memory., 47
- Bargh, 1999, The cognitive monster., 361
- 10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.768 · DOI
- Block, 1980, The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the origination of behavior., Vol. 13, 39
- 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752 · DOI · Paper page
- Descartes, 1931, Meditations on first philosophy: The Philosophical works of Rene Descanes
- Fiske, 1989, Examining the role of intent: Toward understanding its role in stereotyping and prejudice., 253
- Fiske, 1991, Social cognition.
- 10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.317 · DOI
- Gilbert, 1995, Attribution and interpersonal perception., 126
- Gilbert, 1998, Ordinary personology., Vol. 2, 89
- LaBerge, 2000, Networks of attention., 711
- Luck, 2000, The operation of selective attention at multiple stages of processing: Evidence from human and monkey electrophysiology., 687
- Nelson, 2002, Extinction, inhibition, and emotional intelligence.
- Panksepp, 2000, Emotion as natural kinds within the mammalian brain., 137
- 10.1037/0096-3445.126.3.211 · DOI
- Rothbart, 1998, Temperament., Vol. 3, 105
- Rothbart, 1981, Development of individual differences in infant temperament., Vol. 1, 37
- Schober, 1998, Different kinds of conversational perspective-taking., 145
- 10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.34 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336 · Cited by 5,289
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 · Cited by 5,137
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612460685 · Cited by 4,271
Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196772 · Cited by 2,882
Self-citationThe brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review
Lindquist, K. A., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L. F. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000446 · Cited by 2,320
“We hypothesize that executive attention helps determine which representations are utilized to make meaning of that state, and which are suppressed (cf. Barrett 2009b; see Barrett et al. 2004, for a discussion).”
InfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Barrett, L. F., Tugade, M. M., & Engle, R. W.
- Affiliations
- Boston College (US)
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 553-573
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- PMC
- PMC1351135
- OpenAlex
- W2133991911
- Cited by
- 913
- References
- 290
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 34.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH064267, K02MH001981, F32-MH64267)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- working memory capacity, dual-process theory, individual differences, automatic and controlled processing, attentional control, cognitive control, personality psychology, social psychology, clinical psychology
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Memory, Motivation, Psychological Theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
