The DOI matches its Crossref record; 189 of the 189 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 166 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Autobiographical memory specificity and emotional disorder.
Open accessAbstract
The authors review research showing that when recalling autobiographical events, many emotionally disturbed patients summarize categories of events rather than retrieving a single episode. The mechanisms underlying such overgeneral memory are examined, with a focus on M. A. Conway and C. W. Pleydell-Pearce's (2000) hierarchical search model of personal event retrieval. An elaboration of this model is proposed to account for overgeneral memory, focusing on how memory search can be affected by (a) capture and rumination processes, when mnemonic information used in retrieval activates ruminative thinking; (b) functional avoidance, when episodic material threatens to cause affective disturbance; and (c) impairment in executive capacity and control that limits an individual's ability to remain focused on retrieval in the face of distraction.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that overgeneral autobiographical memory—recalling summarized categories rather than specific episodes—is reliably associated with depression and trauma-related disorders. It proposes the CaR-FA-X model, in which capture/rumination, functional avoidance, and impaired executive control jointly explain overgeneral retrieval and its downstream consequences.
Key findings
- Overgeneral memory is consistently found in major depressive disorder: 11 studies showed significant depressed-versus-control differences with a mean effect size of Cohen’s d = 1.12 (IQR = 0.44); across 28 of 30 affective-disorder studies with sufficient data, mean d = 0.94 (IQR = 0.57).
- Trauma history is also linked to overgeneral memory, with a mean effect size of d = 1.13 (IQR = 0.72) for studies showing a significant association, though mere trauma exposure is not sufficient; effects depend on trauma severity/prolongation and coping, and overgenerality is not found in general anxiety disorder, social phobia, or high trait anxiety.
- Overgeneral memory is associated with impaired problem solving, difficulty imagining specific future events, and delayed recovery from affective episodes; it can be reduced by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and by retrieval-practice interventions, with mood improvement mediated by increased memory specificity.
- The proposed CaR-FA-X account identifies three interacting mechanisms: capture and rumination by abstract self-related information, functional avoidance of aversive episodic detail, and reduced executive capacity/control that impairs inhibition during generative retrieval.
Methods
- Narrative review of research on autobiographical memory specificity, primarily using the Autobiographical Memory Test (AMT) cue-word paradigm, with some studies using vignettes, scenarios, or free recall.
- Synthesizes clinical and nonclinical samples across depression, suicidality, PTSD, trauma exposure, anxiety, and other disorders; Tables 1 and 2 summarize affective-disorder and trauma studies.
- Main analysis is qualitative integration plus effect-size aggregation (Cohen’s d and interquartile ranges) where sufficient data were available, followed by elaboration of Conway and Pleydell-Pearce’s self-memory model into the CaR-FA-X framework.
Limitations
- The paper states methodological limitations: studies vary in number and content of cues; not all control for IQ, education, semantic processing speed, or general memory ability; depression and trauma history are often confounded, with no 2 × 2 design; trauma is sometimes assessed retrospectively; and too few longitudinal studies exist to distinguish scarring from vulnerability.
- The paper also states that many studies are cross-sectional, and even prospective studies often lack comprehensive assessment of prior trauma, prior depression, and other mediators such as rumination or executive functioning.
- Evident from the text: as a review, its conclusions depend on the included studies and available effect-size data, and it cannot itself resolve unresolved causal questions about overgeneral memory and emotional disorder.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
114 Not checked yet · 67 Own interpretation · 30 No basis given · 5 Own result · 1 Own method
In the paper
“Dalgleish, Spinks, Yiend, and Kuyken (2001) compared participants with SAD (in the depression phase) with control participants and did not find a difference in memory specificity.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory in Affective Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dalgleish, Spinks, Yiend, and Kuyken (2001)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“and in samples with subclinical levels of depression (often referred to as dysphoria to distinguish it from more severe major depression described earlier; Goddard, Dritschel, & Burton, 1997; Moffitt, Singer, Nelligan, Carlson, & Vyse, 1994; Ramponi, Barnard, & Nimmo-Smith, 2004).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory in Affective Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Goddard, Dritschel, & Burton, 1997
- Not checked yetcites Moffitt, Singer, Nelligan, Carlson, & Vyse, 1994
- Not checked yetcites Ramponi, Barnard, & Nimmo-Smith, 2004
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“in currently euthymic patients with previous episodes of MDD or bipolar disorder”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory in Affective Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mackinger, Loschin, & Leibetseder, 2000
- Not checked yetcites Mackinger, Pachinger, Leibetseder, & Fartacek, 2000
- Not checked yetcites Scott, Stanton, Garland, & Ferrier, 2000
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Comparing depressed women with and without a history of childhood sexual abuse, they found those who reported a history of abuse retrieved significantly more overgeneral memories than the depressed patients who did not report such a history.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory and Trauma
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kuyken & Brewin, 1995
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Failures to replicate overgeneral memory in currently depressed patients are relatively rare.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory in Affective Disorders
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Table 1 also shows that overgeneral memory occurs in other types of affective disorder, such as postnatal depression (Croll & Bryant, 2000);”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory in Affective Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Croll & Bryant, 2000
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Table 1 shows, first, that overgeneral memory is a consistent characteristic of patients with a diagnosis of MDD.”
- Also stated in: § Overgeneral Memory in Affective Disorders · boosted
“In summary, the overwhelming majority of studies have shown that overgeneral memory is closely associated with depression or depressive symptoms.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory in Affective Disorders
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Overgeneral Memory in Affective Disorders · boosted
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The authors review research showing that when recalling autobiographical events, many emotionally disturbed patients summarize categories of events rather than retrieving a single episode.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Kaney, Bowen-Jones, and Bentall (1999) found no evidence of overgeneral memory in a group of depressed patients with delusional disorders”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory in Affective Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kaney, Bowen-Jones, and Bentall (1999)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This has been found for premenstrual dysphoria (Mackinger, Kunz-Dorfer, Schneider, & Leibetseder, 2001)”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Why Is the Overgeneral Memory Phenomenon Important?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mackinger, Kunz-Dorfer, Schneider, & Leibetseder, 2001
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 62
- Probably not a substantial claim. 25
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The overall mean effect size for the 28 out of 30 studies in Table 1 for which sufficient data were available to compute Cohen's d statistic is 0.94 (IQR = 0.57)—a large effect size.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory in Affective Disorders
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Eleven studies show a significant difference between depressed patients and matched controls, yielding a mean effect size (Cohen's d) of 1.12 (interquartile range [IQR] = 0.44).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory in Affective Disorders
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The phenomenon occurs whether specificity or overgenerality is used as an outcome variable and whether studies examine depressed or suicidal patients or dysphoric nonclinical samples.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory in Affective Disorders
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Iqbal, Birchwood, Hemsley, Jackson, and Morris's (2004) study of postpsychotic depression found no overall main effect, though there was an effect for positive cue words.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory in Affective Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Iqbal, Birchwood, Hemsley, Jackson, and Morris's (2004)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The data suggest that a history of traumatic experiences is closely linked to the occurrence of overgeneral memory deficits, and this occurs despite the fact that individuals are not being asked to retrieve memories related to their trauma.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory and Trauma
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Unlike dysphoria, in which overgenerality is found, it is not found in individuals with high trait anxiety (Richards & Whittaker, 1990).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory and Trauma
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Richards & Whittaker, 1990
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“On the other hand, those studies that have used different cuing procedures (e.g., Moore et al., 1988, which used vignettes such as “Recall a time when a neighbour helped you with a practical problem”) have reported large effect sizes (1.15 in this study), suggesting that the phenomenon is relatively robust across different cuing procedures.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Methodological Limitations > Number and Content of the Words Used as Cues
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Moore et al., 1988
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“(b) problems in imagining future events, with overgenerality for past events predicting nonspecificity in specifying future events (Williams et al., 1996)”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Why Is the Overgeneral Memory Phenomenon Important?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Williams et al., 1996
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In borderline personality disorder, although one early study found more overgeneral memory in such patients (Jones et al., 1999), other studies that have taken account of comorbid diagnoses have not found it (Arntz et al., 2002; Kremers et al., 2004).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory and Trauma
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jones et al., 1999
- Not checked yetcites Arntz et al., 2002
- Not checked yetcites Kremers et al., 2004
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although the majority of studies have found evidence of an association between memory specificity and trauma, there are some that have failed to replicate this effect (Arntz, Meeren, & Wessel, 2002; Kremers, Spinhoven, & Van der Does, 2004; Peeters, Wessel, Merckelbach, & Boon-Vermeeren, 2002; Wessel, Meeren, Peeters, Arntz, & Merckelbach, 2001; Wilhelm, McNally, Baer, & Florin, 1997).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory and Trauma
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Arntz, Meeren, & Wessel, 2002
- Not checked yetcites Kremers, Spinhoven, & Van der Does, 2004
- Not checked yetcites Peeters, Wessel, Merckelbach, & Boon-Vermeeren, 2002
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, what is clear from the data is that, notwithstanding the methodological noise and variety across the studies, the effects are remarkably consistent and the effect sizes large.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Methodological Limitations > Summary
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In conclusion, we still cannot be sure the extent to which overgeneral memory prior to trauma renders people vulnerable for developing emotional problems following trauma experience or how much the trauma itself negatively affects memory specificity.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Methodological Limitations > Too Few Longitudinal Studies
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“On the other hand, they did find, as predicted, a close association with a measure of source memory—that is, misassignment of correctly recognized words to the “wrong” (distractor) list—and that both overgeneral memory and poor source memory were associated with rumination (even after partialing out depression).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Methodological Limitations > General Intelligence or Memory Ability
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Raes, Hermans, Williams, Demyttenaere, et al. (2006)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They found that specificity of autobiographical retrieval was found to be positively related to remembering (which requires recollection of contextual detail—the circumstances in which the word was previously seen) but not to knowing (which does not).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Methodological Limitations > General Intelligence or Memory Ability
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ramponi et al. (2004)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A third possible methodological limitation is that the published studies have tended to examine either depression (see Table 1) or patients with a history of trauma (see Table 2). Authors naturally attribute differences found between the clinical and control groups to the variable of interest (depression or trauma), and few studies have examined both (though see Kuyken, Howell, & Dalgleish, 2006).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Methodological Limitations > Depression and Trauma History Confounded
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kuyken, Howell, & Dalgleish, 2006
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the mean effect sizes for those studies of trauma that give sufficient information to compute them were 0.97 for positive and 0.82 for negative cues.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > What Are the Limitations of the Functional Avoidance Model?
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Second, Barnard, Watkins, and Ramponi (2006) showed that inducing normal participants to repeatedly return to the same higher order theme during a category generation task increased overgeneral memory, relative to inducing category generation that shifts across themes, but that this effect occurred only for self-related themes.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > The “Capture” of Retrieval by Abstract–Conceptual (Ruminative) Structures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Barnard, Watkins, and Ramponi (2006)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, the studies that reported sufficient data to compute effect sizes for different cue-valence conditions show that differences between depressed and control participants in overgenerality to positive cues yield an effect size of 0.91, whereas that for negative cues is 0.48.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > What Are the Limitations of the Functional Avoidance Model?
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Of the 12 studies in Table 2, only 2 reported that overgenerality in response to negative cues was associated with trauma (Dalgleish et al., 2003; Peeters et al., 2002), 9 reported that trauma history is associated with both valences, and 1 reported that negative cues elicited more specific memories (Burnside et al., 2004).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > What Are the Limitations of the Functional Avoidance Model?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dalgleish et al., 2003
- Not checked yetcites Peeters et al., 2002
- Not checked yetcites Burnside et al., 2004
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In particular, they were able to show that overgeneral errors correlated with tasks in which irrelevant material needed to be inhibited (the Emotional Stroop Test) and not with a task that merely requires sufficient executive capacity overall (a test of explicit memory of equivalent difficulty).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Overgeneral Memory as a Consequence of Reduced Executive Resources
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dalgleish et al. (in press)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a series of studies in dysphoric individuals, Dalgleish et al. demonstrated that this was indeed the case: Levels of memory overgenerality correlated highly with levels of task errors on a range of executive paradigms with little or no relationship to autobiography, memory, or emotion while, in most cases, being unrelated to overall performance levels on these tasks.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Overgeneral Memory as a Consequence of Reduced Executive Resources
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dalgleish et al. (in press)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Williams et al. (2006, Study 3) required participants to retrieve autobiographical memories while performing random button pressing as a secondary task, as generation of a random pattern has been suggested as a paradigmatic example of a task requiring high levels of central executive control (Baddeley, 1996). They found that this task did interfere with specific memory retrieval, but only when”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Overgeneral Memory as a Consequence of Reduced Executive Resources
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Williams et al. (2006, Study 3)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Williams et al. (1996) found that suicidal patients were generally poorer than controls at generating specific events that might happen to them in the future, and that this difficulty was correlated with overgenerality in memory.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Consequences for Psychological Functioning > Ability to Imagine Future Events
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Williams et al. (1996)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The results showed that (a) the treatment significantly reduced overgenerality (particularly in response to neutral cues), (b) it significantly reduced hopelessness and depression (compared with a no-treatment control), and (c) the effect on mood was mediated by the increased specificity of memory.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Consequences for Psychological Functioning > Overgenerality and the Development and Course of Affective Symptoms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Serrano, Latorre, Gatz, and Rodriguez (2004)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The above studies have found significant associations between memory specificity and both of these measures.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Consequences for Psychological Functioning > Problem Solving
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Results showed that participants who were induced to be categorical in their retrieval for past events in the study phase of the experiment generated less specific future events during the test phase. Participants who were induced to be specific in their memory in the study phase produced more specific future events in the test phase.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Consequences for Psychological Functioning > Ability to Imagine Future Events
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Williams et al. (1996)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition, there is an increasing body of evidence to suggest that depression is associated with intrusive and avoidance symptomatology regarding prior distressing life events (Dalgleish & Power, 2004), with studies revealing few differences between clinically depressed individuals and those with PTSD in terms of the nature of these symptoms (Reynolds & Brewin, 1998).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Integrating Across Different Components of Overgeneral Memory in Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Model > Trauma and Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dalgleish & Power, 2004
- Not checked yetcites Reynolds & Brewin, 1998
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, these studies either involved low levels of trauma or focused on depression or personality disorders rather than trauma as their primary research question.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Overgeneral Memory and Trauma
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If there is an encoding failure, ESK will be impoverished in individuals with depression (and other conditions) so that any preponderance of categorical responses to word cues will arise because autobiographical information is more likely to be encoded in abstracted ways in these groups.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory Retrieval > How Does Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Model Explain Overgeneral Memory?
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If environmental adversity is found to have long-term impact on an individual, then it can do so only by producing either long-term changes in the environment or long-term changes in the individual.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Methodological Limitations > Too Few Longitudinal Studies
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Everyone needs access to both episodic information and general summary information to navigate successfully through the interpersonal and instrumental demands of daily living.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory Retrieval
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Conway and Pleydell-Pearce (2000) described autobiographical memories as “transitory dynamic mental constructions generated from an underlying knowledge base” (p. 261).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory Retrieval > Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Self-Memory System
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Conway and Pleydell-Pearce (2000)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Autobiographical memories are stored as records of events and these records are organized in hierarchies leading from general to more specific event representations.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These models converge on the view that intrusive images or memories and flashbacks arise from the relatively automatic activation of mnemonic material related to the trauma”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Functional Avoidance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brewin, 2001
- Not checked yetcites Brewin, Dalgleish, & Joseph, 1996
- Not checked yetcites Ehlers & Clark, 2000
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overgenerality in memory may be just such a long-term effect.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Methodological Limitations > Too Few Longitudinal Studies
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Their model includes three levels of representation within the autobiographical knowledge base (see Figure 1).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory Retrieval > Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Self-Memory System
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Conway and Pleydell-Pearce (2000)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- The authors state this as an assumption: General event representations are the preferred or default level of access into the autobiographical memory knowledge base.
In the paper
“Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's (2000) explanation of overgeneral memory is that the recollection of general descriptions may produce less affect than the recollection of specific episodic memories, thus enabling current goal pursuit to be maintained in the face of potential deflection.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Functional Avoidance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's (2000)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“This theory conceptualizes voluntary retrieval as “a process in which some information about a target item is used to construct a description of the item and this description is used in attempts to recover new fragments of information” (M. D. Williams & Hollan, 1981, p. 87).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory Retrieval
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites M. D. Williams & Hollan, 1981
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Autobiographical memories are stored as records of events and these records are organized in hierarchies leading from general to more specific event representations.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conclude that although overgenerality in autobiographical memory is likely related in some cases to general memory deficits, it is not wholly explained by such deficits. It is associated with those aspects of memory that depend on recalling contextual detail.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Methodological Limitations > General Intelligence or Memory Ability
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For a successful restaurant experience, we need to have access both to our general restaurant scripts and to the episodic memories, the “tags” that differentiate this one from others and allow us to take account of any particular peculiarities (Schank & Abelson, 1977).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory Retrieval
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schank & Abelson, 1977
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The distinction between general and specific event representations is not new (see Barsalou, 1988; Neisser, 1986; Nelson, 1988).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory Retrieval
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Barsalou, 1988
- Not checked yetcites Neisser, 1986
- Not checked yetcites Nelson, 1988
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Autobiographical memories are stored as records of events and these records are organized in hierarchies leading from general to more specific event representations.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recent models consequently stress the role of central executive control in the activation and inhibition of memory components as well as the importance of the current motivations and goal structure of the individual.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory Retrieval
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“ESK differs from general event and lifetime period representations in that it consists primarily of more concrete sensory–perceptual aspects of unique events, often including visual imagery rather than abstract, conceptual, verbal summaries of past experience.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory Retrieval > Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Self-Memory System
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Conway and Pleydell-Pearce (2000)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- The authors state this as an assumption: General event representations are the preferred or default level of access into the autobiographical memory knowledge base.
In the paper
“Mnemonic interlock refers to the suggestion that if early truncation of the search process at the intermediate description level is followed by further abortive attempts at retrieval, the conceptual network of intermediate descriptions will become increasingly elaborated.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > The “Capture” of Retrieval by Abstract–Conceptual (Ruminative) Structures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Williams, 1996
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Truncated search (dysfacilitation of the retrieval process) underlies the retrieval of overgeneral memories.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In each case, ex-patients remained more overgeneral overall, but in each study, responses to positive cues were relatively less overgeneral than responses to negative cues (effect sizes of 0.63 vs. 1.21, 0.72 vs. 1.38, and 0.75 vs. 1.10 for positive vs. negative cues, respectively)”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > What Are the Limitations of the Functional Avoidance Model?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mackinger, Loschin, & Leibetseder, 2000
- Not checked yetcites Mackinger, Pachinger, et al., 2000
- Not checked yetcites Williams & Dritschel, 1988
plaincorrelationaln = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A clear pattern has emerged, showing that various types of trauma are associated with a reduction in specificity of autobiographical memory, making the functional avoidance account of overgeneral memory a plausible one.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > What Are the Limitations of the Functional Avoidance Model?
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The less specific the participant was, the higher were the scores on a range of avoidance questionnaires. This was demonstrated for a variety of coping behaviors, ranging from social behavioral avoidance (Cognitive Behavioural Avoidance Scale; Ottenbreit & Dobson, 2004) and experiential avoidance (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire; Hayes et al., in press) to thought suppression (White Bear Suppr”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Functional Avoidance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ottenbreit & Dobson, 2004
- Not checked yetcites Hayes et al., in press
- Not checked yetcites Wegner & Zanakos, 1994
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Raes, Hermans, Williams, and Eelen (2006) replicated these results and additionally showed that participants who were low in specificity tended to be high repressors”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Functional Avoidance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Raes, Hermans, Williams, and Eelen (2006)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is some evidence to suggest that this predominance of conceptual self-relevant information in the early stages of memory search may lead to difficulties with the retrieval of specific memories in two circumstances: first, in individuals who possess highly activated or elaborated repertoires of emotion-related self-representations, and second, in individuals prone to rumination”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > The “Capture” of Retrieval by Abstract–Conceptual (Ruminative) Structures
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a meta-analysis of 14 studies concluded that such patients are overgeneral in their memories following both positive and negative cues, with overgenerality for positive and negative memories being highly intercorrelated (van Vreeswijk & de Wilde, 2004).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > What Are the Limitations of the Functional Avoidance Model?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites van Vreeswijk & de Wilde, 2004
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If overgeneral memory arises from a “stop” rule introduced at a point in the retrieval search where fragments of unpleasant memories begin to be accessed, then we might expect that such overgenerality would be more likely to be shown in response to negative cues than positive cues.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > What Are the Limitations of the Functional Avoidance Model?
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We suggest that dysfacilitation as an avoidant coping style is a process that is shaped by contingencies and takes some time to develop.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Functional Avoidance
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's (2000) model assumes that generative retrieval (as with all effortful cognitive tasks) requires the use of limited executive resources.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Overgeneral Memory as a Consequence of Reduced Executive Resources
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's (2000)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The model suggests that capacity deficits may affect several stages of generative retrieval, including the definition and holding in working memory of a retrieval model, the control processes that inhibit irrelevant autobiographical knowledge during the search (thus avoiding capture errors, addressed in the previous section), and the holding in working memory of a final search result, all of which”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Overgeneral Memory as a Consequence of Reduced Executive Resources
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's (2000)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within this framework, as we have seen, a positive cue word could signal to a depressed person the absence of a personally meaningful state and, in turn, activate further rumination.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Executive Resources, Capture/Rumination, and the Valence Effect
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both the overriding of ongoing processing by trauma-related intrusions and any effortful attempts to control such experiences are likely to lead to a diminution of executive resources to apply to other tasks.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Integrating Across Different Components of Overgeneral Memory in Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Model > Trauma and Reduced Executive Capacity
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although reductions in processing capacities may affect all of these subprocesses, failures of inhibitory control are most pronounced.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Overgeneral Memory as a Consequence of Reduced Executive Resources
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each of the components of the CaR-FA-X account has evidence consistent with it.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Integrating Across Different Components of Overgeneral Memory in Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This is perhaps unsurprising, given that traumatized individuals report frequent intrusive thoughts, images, nightmares, and flashbacks regarding their trauma as well as consequent attempts to prevent these experiences using a range of strategies, such as avoidance of trauma reminders (see Dalgleish, 2004).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Integrating Across Different Components of Overgeneral Memory in Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Model > Trauma and Reduced Executive Capacity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dalgleish, 2004
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, categorical memory may represent truncated hierarchical search, exacerbated by capture by conceptual structures. These impairments are themselves compounded by reduced processing resources and by the continuing impact of early trauma and adversity on the self-memory system.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Integrating Across Different Components of Overgeneral Memory in Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Model
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“autobiographical events can also be recollected spontaneously. Such directly retrieved memories are more often specific in nature (Berntsen & Hall, 2004).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Overgeneral Memory as a Consequence of Reduced Executive Resources
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berntsen & Hall, 2004
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Ellis (e.g., Ellis & Ashbrook, 1988), in his resource allocation model of cognitive processing in depression, proposed that the profile of cognitive performance in depressed individuals could be broadly explained by the notion of reduced executive resources.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Overgeneral Memory as a Consequence of Reduced Executive Resources
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ellis & Ashbrook, 1988
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“We have also seen that in addition to the difficulty in generative retrieval, some individuals (those who have experienced trauma such as road traffic accidents) are additionally likely to truncate the search process if episodic knowledge tends to evoke highly negative affect. In these cases, stopping short of episodic retrieval is functional (Raes et al., 2003) and is negatively reinforced by the”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Integrating Across Different Components of Overgeneral Memory in Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Raes et al., 2003
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Hertel (e.g., Hertel & Hardin, 1990) expanded on this resource allocation model view and proposed that depressed individuals lacked initiative when performing cognitive tasks, such that performance deficits could be overcome by providing the depressed individuals with information about the optimal way to complete a given task.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Overgeneral Memory as a Consequence of Reduced Executive Resources
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hertel & Hardin, 1990
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Depressed individuals have increased access to conceptual self-relevant information (negative self-schemas such as “I am worthless and inadequate”; Segal, Williams, Teasdale, & Gemar, 1996), and rumination leads to chronic activation of such generalized mental representations (“Why do I have problems other people don't have?”; Nolen-Hoeksema, 1991).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Integrating Across Different Components of Overgeneral Memory in Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Segal, Williams, Teasdale, & Gemar, 1996
- Not checked yetcites Nolen-Hoeksema, 1991
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, the effects of trauma on reducing available executive resources (discussed above) will mean that it is more difficult to inhibit interfering cognitive information during the generative retrieval process, thus resulting in that information forming the basis of capture errors.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Integrating Across Different Components of Overgeneral Memory in Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Model > Trauma and Capture Errors
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generative retrieval requires processing capacity for both the setting up of a retrieval model and its comparison with retrieved information; it also critically requires the inhibition of irrelevant information to protect against interference.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Overgeneral Memory as a Consequence of Reduced Executive Resources
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, some trauma gives rise to a large number of long-lasting intrusions that reduce available resources for autobiographical memory search, thus further compounding the problem.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Integrating Across Different Components of Overgeneral Memory in Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Model
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The data suggest that executive resources play an important role in the generative retrieval of specific autobiographical memories and that deficient resources reduce the amount of cognitive control that is possible.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Executive Resources, Capture/Rumination, and the Valence Effect
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Finally, Zacks and Hasher (1994) proposed that depressed individuals have difficulties inhibiting interfering cognitive material when seeking to perform cognitive tasks.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Explaining the Mechanisms Underlying Overgeneral Memory > Overgeneral Memory as a Consequence of Reduced Executive Resources
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zacks and Hasher (1994)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reduced executive capacity and diminished cognitive control will therefore compound a tendency to become captured by abstract conceptual self-representations and will diminish strategic task-oriented processing.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Integrating Across Different Components of Overgeneral Memory in Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Model
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, a history of trauma may lead to overgenerality not only because of passive avoidance of emotion-related ESK but because intrusion of traumatic information reduces available executive resources.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Integrating Across Different Components of Overgeneral Memory in Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Model > Trauma and Reduced Executive Capacity
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Second, the experience of trauma is itself likely to lead to relatively accessible negative self-schemas (Dalgleish, 2004; Ehlers & Clark, 2000). Such schemas will also “capture” cognitive processing during generative retrieval in particular autobiographical domains, leading to overgeneral responses as capture errors.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Integrating Across Different Components of Overgeneral Memory in Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Model > Trauma and Capture Errors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dalgleish, 2004
- Not checked yetcites Ehlers & Clark, 2000
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, we show that trauma may affect (a) executive capacity, (b) the probability of capture errors, and (c) depression.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Integrating Across Different Components of Overgeneral Memory in Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Model
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the light of these overlaps both in clinical phenomenology and in underlying mechanisms, we suggest that all three mechanisms are likely to contribute both to overgenerality in autobiographical memory and, independently, to those aspects of cognitive functioning that have been found to be affected by such overgenerality (problem solving, imagining the future, and persistence of emotional”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Consequences for Psychological Functioning
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Overgenerality in memory is part of the causal sequence in bringing about consequences such as problem solving, imagining the future, and persistence of emotional disturbance.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We have seen that there are a number of methodological issues that limit the conclusions that can be made from many of the studies taken individually.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Concluding Remarks
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“This is clearly important, as the ability to anticipate potential impending events and experiences is critical for the day-to-day planning of activities (Ajzen, 1998).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Consequences for Psychological Functioning > Ability to Imagine Future Events
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ajzen, 1998
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“However, because these studies are correlational, it remains possible that both specificity of autobiographical memories and quality of problem-solving performance might be determined by third factors. For example, Watkins and Baracaia (2002) have found that rumination impairs problem solving in depression, and so the apparent effect of overgeneral memory on problem solving may be mediated by rum”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Consequences for Psychological Functioning > Problem Solving
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Watkins and Baracaia (2002)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, these studies provide relatively strong evidence that overgeneral memory, along with other variables, is an important causal factor in maintaining depression and that modifying it may have beneficial consequences.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Consequences for Psychological Functioning > Overgenerality and the Development and Course of Affective Symptoms
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The phenomenon of overgeneral memory ranks alongside other memory deficits known for many years to be associated with depression but goes beyond these in several ways.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Concluding Remarks
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, the MEPS is a well-established measure of social problem solving that reliably discriminates between groups that have been determined to differ in actual real-life problem solving (e.g., depressed patients vs. controls; Marx, Williams, & Claridge, 1992).”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > CaR-FA-X: Consequences for Psychological Functioning > Problem Solving
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Marx, Williams, & Claridge, 1992
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This phenomenon is a reliable feature of these diagnostic groups and can be found in other (though not all) emotional disorders.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Concluding Remarks
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, capture errors may occur whenever information needed for the memory search matches information that is self-schematic. Whenever individuals then ruminate about what has happened to them, reduced capacity/control will reduce the ability to inhibit further task-irrelevant information.”
§ Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Emotional Disorder > Integrating Across Different Components of Overgeneral Memory in Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Model > Trauma and Capture Errors
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Autobiographical memories are stored as records of events and these records are organized in hierarchies leading from general to more specific event representations.
“An underlying assumption of descriptions theory is that autobiographical memories are stored as records of events and that these records are organized in hierarchies leading from general to more specific event representations.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
General event representations are the preferred or default level of access into the autobiographical memory knowledge base.
“general event representations (assumed to be the preferred or default level of access into the autobiographical memory knowledge base)”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Supervisory executive processes are required to inhibit activation of irrelevant representations, allowing the system to settle into a stable state.
“it is assumed that supervisory executive processes are required to inhibit activation of irrelevant representations, allowing the system to settle into a stable state.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Ongoing experience that is not relevant to active goals is unlikely to be integrated into the autobiographical knowledge base.
“Conway and Pleydell-Pearce (2000) assume that ongoing experience that is not relevant to active goals is unlikely to be integrated into the autobiographical knowledge base.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Experiences that are relevant to ongoing goal processing but challenge self-coherence to an unacceptable degree are also unlikely to be integrated into the long-term self.
“Similarly, experiences that are relevant to ongoing goal processing but challenge self-coherence to an unacceptable degree are also unlikely to be integrated into the long-term self”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Truncated search (dysfacilitation of the retrieval process) underlies the retrieval of overgeneral memories.
“This truncated search, called by Conway and Pleydell-Pearce a dysfacilitation of the retrieval process, is assumed to underlie the retrieval of overgeneral memories.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
ESK are represented primarily in analogue form and usually in visual imagery.
“these are assumed to be represented primarily in analogue form and usually in visual imagery.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Truncated search represents a passive avoidance reaction that arises because representations of past trauma and adversity, encoded within the episodic memory system, create negative affect as the retrieval search begins to elicit perceptual–sensory fragments of aversive events.
“Conway and Pleydell-Pearce assume, therefore, that truncated search represents a passive avoidance reaction that arises because representations of past trauma and adversity, encoded within the episodic memory system, create negative affect as the retrieval search begins to elicit perceptual–sensory fragments of aversive events”
The paper relies on this without support.
Anxious patients are, in general, concerned with possible future threats, most often physical harm to self or others from external sources or from imminent collapse or illness, rather than with self-referential implications of their past.
“Anxious patients are, in general, concerned with possible future threats, most often physical harm to self or others from external sources or from imminent collapse or illness, rather than with self-referential implications of their past.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Overgenerality in memory is part of the causal sequence in bringing about consequences such as problem solving, imagining the future, and persistence of emotional disturbance.
“However, this raises the question of whether overgenerality in memory is part of the causal sequence in bringing about such consequences, as we have assumed, or is a mere epiphenomenon.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Generic retrieval is a normal part of development, and its retention as one possible mode of retrieval is required as part of normal memory function.
“Given that generic retrieval is a normal part of development, and its retention as one possible mode of retrieval is required as part of normal memory function (e.g., as an intermediate stage in the recollection of specific episodes and as the target of retrieval for scriptlike situations)”
The paper relies on this without support.
Intermediate descriptions are required for voluntary retrieval.
“the intermediate descriptions that are required for voluntary retrieval”
The paper relies on this without support.
Reduced executive control results in a failure to inhibit competing information.
“Reduced executive control results in a failure to inhibit competing information.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This suggests that people who are suffering from depression have more difficulty searching a deep tree effectively (possibly also captured by more general, superficial autobiographical recollections; [51]).”
From Bonsai trees in your head: how the pavlovian system sculpts goal-directed choices by pruning decision trees (2012) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“Psychiatric disorders, such as depression (19, 20) and schizophrenia (21), are often characterized by memory biases.”
From Don't Miss the Moment: A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Suicide Research (2022) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Self-citationKessler, R. C. (1994) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950010008002 · Cited by 12,370 · cited 1×
“Lifetime risk for major depression is around 12% for males and 20% for females (Kessler et al., 1994).”
BackgroundPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B
Press, H. (1886) · Cited by 10,087
Cognitive Therapy for Depression
(2012) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e675542012-001 · Cited by 9,678
Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress
Horowitz, M., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004 · Cited by 7,813
(1988) · Cited by 6,825
A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder
Ehlers, A., & Clark, D. M. (2000) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00123-0 · Cited by 6,147 · cited 3×
“Second, the experience of trauma is itself likely to lead to relatively accessible negative self-schemas (Dalgleish, 2004; Ehlers & Clark, 2000).”
BackgroundResultEmotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information.
Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.20 · Cited by 5,396 · cited 1×
“Such a functional avoidance hypothesis would be consistent with current models of PTSD (Brewin, 2001; Brewin, Dalgleish, & Joseph, 1996; Ehlers & Clark, 2000; Foa & Kozak, 1986).”
ResultEpisodic memory: from mind to brain
Tulving, E. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 · Cited by 4,950 · cited 1×
“…events are encoded, retrieved, and forgotten (Castel & Craik, 2003; Hertel & Gerstle, 2003; Lancaster & Barsalou, 1997; Schacter & Slotnick, 2004; Tulving, 1983, 2002; Tulving et al., 1994); its role in organizing one’s sense of self (Conway & Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Fivush & Nelson, 2004); and…”
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- de Decker A. (2001). The specificity of the autobiographical memory retrieval style in adolescents with a history of trauma. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- Ellis H. C., & Ashbrook P. W. (1988). Resource allocation model of the effects of depressed mood states on memory. In Fiedler K. & Forgas J. (Eds.), Affect, cognition and social behavior (pp. 25– 43). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Hogrefe.
- Martin L. L., & Tesser A. (1996). Some ruminative thoughts. In. R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Ruminative thoughts (pp. 1–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Winthorpe C., & Rabbitt P. A. (1988). Working memory capacity, IQ, age, and the ability to recount autobiographical events. In Gruneberg M. M., Morris P. E., & Sykes R. N. (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues II (pp. 175– 179). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognition and Depression: Current Status and Future Directions
Gotlib, I. H., & Joormann, J. (2010) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131305 · Cited by 2,420
Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought
Watkins, E. R. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.163 · Cited by 2,421
Self-citationConway, M. A. (2005) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.005 · Cited by 2,155
The psychology of emotion regulation: An integrative review
Koole, S. L. (2009) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930802619031 · Cited by 1,490
“Furthermore, deficits in emotion regulation, such as chronic depression and ruminative thinking, are associated with reduced specificity of autobiographical memory (Williams et al., 2007).”
BackgroundExamining emotion regulation in depression: A review and future directions
Joormann, J., & Stanton, C. H. (2016) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.07.007 · Cited by 749
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, J. M. G., Barnhofer, T., Crane, C., Herman, D., Raes, F., Watkins, E., & Dalgleish, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 122-148
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- PMC
- PMC2834574
- OpenAlex
- W1992938996
- Semantic Scholar
- e0b29a8ec9dad5f06a1ced21555f0b59ca14fbd2
- Cited by
- 1,688
- References
- 188
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 123 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 106 · 2015: 109 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 105 · 2012: 86
- FWCI
- 106.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (067797)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- autobiographical memory, overgeneral memory, emotional disorders, rumination, executive function, memory specificity, mood disorders
- MeSH terms
- Autobiographies as Topic, Cues, Humans, Memory, Problem Solving, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Mood Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review