The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1,086 of the 1,090 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability
Abstract
This article presents a new theory of subjective probability according to which different descriptions of the same event can give rise to different judgments. The experimental evidence confirms the major predictions of the theory. First, judged probability increases by unpacking the focal hypothesis and decreases by unpacking the alternative hypothesis. Second, judged probabilities are complementary in the binary case and subadditive in the general case, contrary to both classical and revisionist models of belief. Third, subadditivity is more pronounced for probability judgments than for frequency judgments and is enhanced by compatible evidence. The theory provides a unified treatment of a wide range of empirical findings. It is extended to ordinal judgments and to the assessment of upper and lower probabilities. Both laypeople and experts are often called upon to evaluate the probability of uncertain events such as the outcome of a trial, the result of a medical operation, the success of a business venture, or the winner of a football game. Such assessments play an important role in deciding, respectively, whether to go to court, undergo surgery, invest in the venture, or bet on the home team. Uncertainty is usually expressed in verbal terms (e.g., unlikely or probable), but numerical estimates are also common. Weather forecasters, for example, often report the probability of rain (Murphy, 1985), and economists are sometimes required to estimate the chances of recession (Zarnowitz, 1985). The theoretical and practical significance of subjective probability has inspired psychologists, philosophers, and statisticians to investigate this notion from both descriptive and prescriptive standpoints.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the unpacking effect, participants judge, say, 'being a lawyer', to be less probable than the 'unpacked' description 'being a tax, corporate, patent, or other type of lawyer' [44][45][46].”
From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“when guided to where the peaks are (i.e., starting the android from a different location), for example, by being asked about the pattern _ _ _ _ ing in the more detailed description, then large peaks are found and probability estimates are higher [31,45].”
From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
Cites
Items 1,001–1,086 of 1,086
Evaluating probabilistic forecasts of stock prices in a developing stock market
Önkal, D., & Muradoğlu, Y. G. (1994) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(94)90102-3 · Cited by 95
Item Difficulty, Discrimination, and the Confidence-Frequency Effect in a Categorical Judgment Task
Schneider, S. L. (1995) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1012 · Cited by 95
On the Accuracy of Dispositional Versus Situational Attributions
Funder, D. C. (1982) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1982.1.3.205 · Cited by 95
Mood and memory for tightly organized social information
Fiedler, K., Pampe, H., & Scherf, U. (1986) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420160204 · Cited by 94
Wagenaar, W. A., & Keren, G. B. (1985) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(85)90008-1 · Cited by 94
The child's conception of food: The development of categories of acceptable and rejected substances
Rozin, P. N., Fallon, A. E., & Augustoni-Ziskind, M. (1986) · Journal of Nutrition Education · doi:10.1016/s0022-3182(86)80235-7 · Cited by 94
Good Judgment in International Politics: Three Psychological Perspectives
Tetlock, P. E. (1992) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791611 · Cited by 94
ACCURACY OF STUDENT PREDICTION OF COLLEGE GRADES
Doleys, E. J., & Renzaglia, G. A. (1963) · The Personnel and Guidance Journal · doi:10.1002/j.2164-4918.1963.tb02337.x · Cited by 93
Imprinting or exposure learning in rats given early auditory stimulation
Cross, H. A., Halcomb, C. G., & Matter, W. W. (1967) · Psychonomic Science · doi:10.3758/bf03331092 · Cited by 93
Heart Rate and Skin Conductance in Anticipation of Shocks With Varying Probability of Occurrence
Bankart, C. P., & Elliott, R. (1974) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1974.tb00836.x · Cited by 93
“Is” and “ought” in cognitive science
Lycan, W. G. (1981) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00009249 · Cited by 93
Effects of public education about breast cancer and breast self-examination
Siero, S., Kok, G., & Pruyn, J. F. A. (1984) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(84)90157-6 · Cited by 91
Tape, T. G., Heckerling, P. S., Ornato, J. P., & Wigton, R. S. (1991) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x9101100308 · Cited by 91
Whitcomb, K. M., Önkal, D., Curley, S. P., & Benson, P. G. (1995) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960080105 · Cited by 91
Sympathetic Magical Beliefs and Kosher Dietary Practice: The Interaction of Rules and Feelings
Nemeroff, C. J., & Rozin, P. N. (1992) · Ethos · doi:10.1525/eth.1992.20.1.02a00040 · Cited by 91
Where is the fault in fault trees?
Russo, J. E., & Kolzow, K. J. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.20.1.17 · Cited by 89
Appraising health risk appraisal.
Schoenbach, V. J. (1987) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.77.4.409 · Cited by 89
The Fundamental Constants and Quantum Electrodynamics
Taylor, B. N., Parker, W. H., Langenberg, D. N., & Wilson, F. L. (1971) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3022747 · Cited by 89
Judgments of Vulnerability to Pregnancy: The Role of Risk Factors and Individual Differences
Gerrard, M., & Lüüs, C. A. E. (1995) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167295212006 · Cited by 88
“Velocity of Light and of Radio Waves”
Essen, L. (1950) · Nature · doi:10.1038/165821b0 · Cited by 88
The preoccupational hazards of social life.
Osborne, R. E., & Gilber, D. T. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.219 · Cited by 87
On the Competence and Incompetence of Experts
Ayton, P. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-585-34290-0_5 · Cited by 85
From Indices to Mappings: The Representational Approach to Measurement
Krantz, D. H. (1991) · Recent research in psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3088-5_1 · Cited by 85
Tests of Dual Process Theory: Word Priming and Recognition
Mandler, G., Hamson, C. O., & Dorfman, J. (1990) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749008401246 · Cited by 85
Language, literacy, and mental states
Olson, D. R., & Torrance, N. (1987) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638538709544667 · Cited by 85
Falling in Love Again—Analysts’ Estimates and Reality
Clayman, M. R., & Schwartz, R. A. (1994) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.2469/faj.v50.n5.66 · Cited by 84
Forging, cooking, trimming, and riding on the bandwagon
Franklin, A. (1984) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.13551 · Cited by 83
Busemeyer, J. R., & Goldstein, W. M. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90026-4 · Cited by 83
Rush, J. H. (1955) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0855-62 · Cited by 83
Multiple attribute scenarios, bounded probabilities, and threats of nuclear theft
Kirkwood, C. W., & Pollock, S. M. (1982) · Futures · doi:10.1016/0016-3287(82)90038-6 · Cited by 83
Naive conceptions of free will and the deterministic paradox.
Turnbull, W. W. (1981) · Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · doi:10.1037/h0081115 · Cited by 82
Ibsen, H., & Sprinchorn, E. (1965) · MacGibbon & Kee eBooks · Cited by 81
Distributional theories of impression formation
Mellers, B. A., Richards, V., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90016-z · Cited by 81
Wetherick, N. E. (1995) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354395053009 · Cited by 81
Smith, M., & Ferrell, W. R. (1983) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62251-7 · Cited by 80
Mental Efficiency Levels Before and After Shock Therapy
Wittman, M. P., & Russell, J. T. (1942) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.1942.10544715 · Cited by 80
The Law and Psychology of Jury Instructions
Tanford, J. A. (1990) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 78
The psychology of moderate prediction
Ganzach, Y., & Krantz, D. H. (1990) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90036-9 · Cited by 78
Alker, H. A., & Hermann, M. G. (1971) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031035 · Cited by 77
Nickerson, C. A. E. (1995) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.1995.1009 · Cited by 77
Proximity to safety and its effects on fear prediction bias
Telch, M. J., Valentiner, D. P., & Bolte, M. C. (1994) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)90032-9 · Cited by 77
TAYLOR, K. F., & Sluckin, W. (1964) · Nature · doi:10.1038/201108a0 · Cited by 76
THE EFFECTS OF GROUP DECISIONS AND GROUP-SHIFTS ON USE OF THE ANCHORING AND ADJUSTMENT HEURISTIC
Rutledge, R. W. (1993) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.1993.21.3.215 · Cited by 76
Some Connections Between Epistemic Logic and the Theory of Nonadditive Probability
Mongin, P. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0774-7_6 · Cited by 76
Comparative judgements and preferences: The influence of the number of response alternatives
van der Pligt, J., Eiser, J. R., & Spears, R. (1987) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00790.x · Cited by 75
Heart Rate in Anticipation of Shocks Which Have Different Probabilities of Occurrences
Elliott, R. (1975) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1975.36.3.923 · Cited by 75
Approximate probability and expectation of gambles
Suppes, P. (1975) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/bf00226379 · Cited by 74
The bias phenomenon in attitude attribution: Actor and observer perspectives.
Miller, A. G., Baer, R., & Sconberg, P. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1421 · Cited by 74
Snortum, J. R., & Wilding, F. W. (1971) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031874 · Cited by 74
Rationality: A Third Dimension
Schick, F. (1987) · Economics and Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s026626710000273x · Cited by 74
Passion, Preference, and Predictability in Judgmental Forecasting
Buckley, T., & Sniezek, J. A. (1992) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1992.70.3c.1022 · Cited by 73
Edmondson, F. K. (1934) · Nature · doi:10.1038/133759b0 · Cited by 73
Is There a Citation Bias in the Judgment and Decision Literature?
Robins, R. W., & Craik, K. H. (1993) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1011 · Cited by 73
Fundamental Constants of Physics
Cohen, E. R., Crowe, K. M., DuMond, J. W. M., & Beth, R. A. (1959) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1934755 · Cited by 73
Clinical Assessment of the Probability of Coronary Artery Disease
Bobbio, M., Detrano, R., Shandling, A. H., Ellestad, M., Clark, J., Brezden, O. S., Abecia, A., & Martínez-Caro, D. (1992) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x9201200305 · Cited by 72
The 1973 Oil Crisis and its Aftermath
Schumacher, D. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-17797-4_2 · Cited by 72
Judging the strength of designated evidence
Briggs, L. K., & Krantz, D. H. (1992) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960050202 · Cited by 71
Peat: An Integrative Model of Attribution Processes
Medcof, J. W. (1990) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60319-6 · Cited by 70
Assessing probabilities of compound events in a judicial context
Goldsmith, R. W. (1978) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1978.tb00310.x · Cited by 70
Tests of rationality versus an “over optimist” bias
Madsen, J. B. (1994) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/0167-4870(94)90012-4 · Cited by 70
Probability Theory for Statistical Methods
Marsh, C. J., & David, F. N. (1951) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1247384 · Cited by 70
Patrick Suppes: Scientific Philosopher
(1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1152-2 · Cited by 70
Connolly, T. (1994) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1994.9410210760 · Cited by 69
Surgical research, experimentation and innovation
Ward, C. M. (1994) · British Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/0007-1226(94)90165-1 · Cited by 68
Murphy, R. (1994) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1078 · Cited by 68
Lipshitz, R. (1983) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1983.tb00201.x · Cited by 68
A note on an unexpected anchoring bias in intuitive statistical inference
Lovie, P. (1985) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90024-1 · Cited by 68
Bobbio, M., Deorsola, A., Pistis, G., Brusca, A., & Diamond, G. A. (1988) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(88)91201-5 · Cited by 68
False Probabilistic Arguments v. Faulty Intuition
Rubinstein, A. (1979) · Israel Law Review · doi:10.1017/s002122370001640x · Cited by 67
Risk assessment: Evaluating error in subjective estimates
Fischhoff, B., & Whipple, C. G. (1981) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · Cited by 66
Regression to egocentrically determined description of form under conditions of inattention.
Rock, I., & Nijhawan, R. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.259 · Cited by 66
Common sense and adult theory of communication
Keysar, B. (1993) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00028910 · Cited by 64
A theory of temporal adjustments of the evaluation of events: Rosy Prospection & Rosy Retrospection
Mitchell, T. R., & Thompson, L. (1994) · Cited by 62
"Preference trees": Correction to Tversky and Sattath.
Tversky, A., & Sattath, S. (1980) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0078190 · Cited by 61
Self-citationShort-term recognition memory under rehearsal instructions and imaging instructions
Boneau, C. A. (1990) · Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society · doi:10.3758/bf03334026 · Cited by 57
Magical Contagion and Aids Risk Perception in a College Population
Nemeroff, C. J., Brinkman, A., & Woodward, C. K. (1994) · AIDS Education and Prevention · doi:10.1521/aeap.1994.6.3.249 · Cited by 55
Going Beyond Enlightened Self-interest
Curtin, L. L. (1995) · Nursing Management · doi:10.1097/00006247-199511000-00015 · Cited by 53
Scientific aspects of graphology : a handbook
Nevo, B. (1986) · Thomas eBooks · Cited by 48
Equal Weights, Flat Maxima, and Trivial Decisions.
John, R. S., Edwards, W., von Winterfeldt, D., & Barron, F. H. (1980) · Cited by 46
Consistencies and Biases in Risk Perception: I. Anchoring Process and Response-Range Effect
Yamagishi, K. (1994) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.651 · Cited by 46
The effect of mood on different types of well-being judgments.
Borg, I. (1987) · PubMed · Cited by 43
Using a battery of tests to predict suicide in a long-term hospital: A quantitative analysis
Smith, K. (1981) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198107)37:3 · Cited by 9
EFFECT OF TOPOGRAPHY ON TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Young, F. D. (1920) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1920)48 · Cited by 9
VERIFICATION OF FORECASTS EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF PROBABILITY
BRIER, G. W. (1950) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/002205102320161311 · Cited by 6,106
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.697 · Cited by 5,540
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
(1993)
Metadata
- Authors
- Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Koehler, Derek J.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 547-567
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2054875343
- Cited by
- 1,167
- References
- 1,090
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 52
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- subjective probability, support theory, subadditivity, alternative hypothesis, lower and upper probabilities, probability judgment, frequency judgment, belief revision
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
