Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.
Abstract
Several suggestions for a class of theories of recognition memory have been proposed during the past decade.These models address predictions about judgments of prior occurrence of an event, not the identification of what it is, The history and current status of one of these models is discussed.The model postulates the detection of familiarity and the utilization of retrieval mechanisms as additive and separate processes.The phenomenal experience of familiarity is assigned to intraevent organizational integrative processes; retrieval depends on interevent elaborative processes.Other current theoretical options are described, and relevant supportive data from the literature are reviewed.New tests of the model involving both free recall and word pair paradigms are presented.The dual process model is extended to the word frequency effect and to the recognition difficulties of amnesic patients.In general English usage the verb to recognize usually is denned as the act of perceiving something as previously known.It is an apparently clear as well as etymologically correct usage, that is, to know again.In this article the process of recognizing will be analyzed, but it will be restricted to the recognition of the prior occurrence of an event.This restriction follows psychological rather than common usage.Experimentation that addresses problems of recognition has typically required subjects to make judg-.nents about prior encounters with some tar-Portions of this article were presented as a presidential address to the Division of Experimental Psychology, at the meeting of the American Psychological Association in New York, September 1979.The general argument and some of the data presented here were discussed briefly at the November 1978 meeting of the Psychonomic Society in San Antonio, Texas (Mandler, 1978).Preparation of this paper and the research reported herein were supported by National Science Foundation Grant BNS 79-15336.I am grateful to David Rumelhart for substantive suggestions and methodological advice, and to Jan Rabinowitz and Lawrence Barsalou for helping make the model a reality.
Cites (52)
- Levels of processing: A framework for memory researchCraik, Fergus I.M., Lockhart, Robert S. · 1972 · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
- Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Tulving, Endel, Thomson, Donald M. · 1973 · Psychological Review
- Interaction of information in word recognition.Morton, John · 1969 · Psychological Review
- Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments.Saul Sternberg · 1969 · PubMed
- Recognition memory for words, sentences, and picturesShepard, Roger N. · 1967 · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
- Contemporary Developments in Mathematical PsychologyHumphreys, Michael S., Krantz, David H., Atkinson, Richard, Luce, R. Duncan, Suppes, Patrick · 1976 · The American Journal of Psychology
- Amnesic Syndrome: Consolidation or Retrieval?WARRINGTON, ELIZABETH K., WEISKRANTZ, L. · 1970 · Nature
- Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.Anderson, John R., Bower, Gordon H. · 1972 · Psychological Review
- Psychology of MemoryAlan Baddeley, Baddeley · 1976
- Toward a theory of memory and attention.Norman, Donald A. · 1968 · Psychological Review
Cited by (102)
- Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.Squire, Larry R. · 1992 · Psychological Review
- The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of ResearchYonelinas, Andrew P · 2002 · Journal of Memory and Language
- Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?Donchin, Emanuel, Coles, Michael G. H. · 1988 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Implicit memory: History and current status.Schacter, Daniel L. · 1987 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal–anterior thalamic axisAggleton, John P., Brown, Malcolm W. · 1999 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.87.3.252
- The paper
- Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.87.3.252
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.