Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts.
Abstract
Social comparison processes include the desire to affiliate with others, the desire for information about others, and explicit self-evaluation against others. Previously these types of comparison activity and their corresponding measures have been treated as interchangeable. We present evidence that in certain groups under threat, these comparison activities diverge, with explicit self-evaluation made against a less fortunate target (downward evaluation), but information and affiliation sought out from more fortunate others (upward contacts). These effects occur because downward evaluation and upward contacts appear to serve different needs, the former ameliorating self-esteem and the latter enabling a person to improve his or her situation and simultaneously increase motivation and hope. Implications for the concept, measurement, and theory of social comparison are discussed.
Cites (40)
- “Stress: appraisal and coping,”Folkman, Susan · 2013 · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine
- A theory of social comparison processesFestinger, Leon · 1954 · Human Relations
- Downward comparison principles in social psychologyWills, Thomas A. · 1981 · Psychological Bulletin
- The Psychology of affiliationBeech, H.R. · 1963 · Journal of Psychosomatic Research
- Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.Pettigrew, Thomas F., Suls., Jerry M., Miller, Richard L. · 1979 · Contemporary Sociology
- Theories of Group Behavior1987 · Springer eBooks
- Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer.Joanne V. Wood, Shelley E. Taylor, Rosemary R. Lichtman · 1985 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- It Could Be Worse: Selective Evaluation as a Response to VictimizationTaylor, Shelley E., Wood, Joanne V., Lichtman, Rosemary R. · 1983 · Journal of Social Issues
- Long-term adjustment to physical disability: The role of social support, perceived control, and self-blame.Schulz, Richard, Decker, Susan · 1985 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Social Support and the Cancer Patient: Conceptual and Methodologic IssuesWortman, Camille B. · 1984 · Cancer
Cited by (85)
- The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative reviewGross, James J. · 1998 · Review of General Psychology
- Mechanisms Linking Social Ties and Support to Physical and Mental HealthThoits, Peggy A. · 2011 · Journal of Health and Social Behavior
- Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
- Untitled work2007
- The Affect HeuristicSlovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa, Peters, Ellen, MacGregor, Donald G. · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.96.4.569
- The paper
- Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.96.4.569
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.