Cited by 290Action Observation and SynchronizationMotor Control and AdaptationFree Will and Agency

Experience modulates automatic imitation

Heyes, Cecilia, Bird, Geoffrey, Johnson, Helen, Haggard, Patrick·2005·Cognitive Brain Research

Abstract

Action observation gives rise to activation in corresponding areas of the premotor and primary motor cortices. We tested the hypothesis that this activation depends on visual-motor connections established through correlated experience of observing and executing the same action. Previous work has shown that hand opening and hand closing gestures are facilitated when subjects observe the movement they are performing, relative to a condition in which they observe a different movement from the one they are performing. Experiment 1 replicated this finding in a simple reaction time (RT) procedure using stimulus-response (SR) movements in orthogonal planes. This implies that the effect is an example of automatic imitation, an instruction-independent tendency to execute movements that are topologically similar to those observed, and not merely an example of spatially compatible responding. In Experiment 2, the automatic imitation effect found in Experiment 1 was abolished by a brief period of training in which subjects responded to hand opening by closing their hands, and to hand closing by opening their hands. This outcome is consistent with the hypothesis that, rather than being innate, the cortical connections mediating motor activation by action observation are formed through experience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.009

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies using the stimulus-response compatibility paradigm have found that participants respond faster on compatible than incompatible trials.

    “Previous studies using this paradigm, which did not manipulate social attitudes, have found an automatic imitation effect: participants make their hand movement responses faster in compatible than in incompatible trials (Heyes, Bird, Johnson & Haggard, 2005;Leighton & Heyes, under review;Press, Walsh & Heyes, 2007;Stürmer, Aschersleben, & Prinz, 2000).”

    From Social attitudes modulate automatic imitation (2010) · cites this paper as Heyes, Bird, Johnson & Haggard, 2005

  • Later studies have shown that automatic imitation is not dependent on stimulus salience or spatial compatibility.

    “more recent studies corrected these problems and confirmed that automatic imitation was independent of stimulus salience or spatial compatibility”
  • Automatic imitation has been shown to be modulated by social context cues.

    “Automatic imitation has been shown to be modulated by social context cues (see e.g.3–11)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heyes, C., Bird, G., Johnson, H., & Haggard, P.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Heyes, Cecilia
Venue
Cognitive Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-02
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
233-240
ISSN
0926-6410 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088639578
Cited by
290
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 29
FWCI
24.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
automatic imitation, action observation, motor cortex, premotor cortex, stimulus-response compatibility, training effects, topological similarity, motor learning, reaction time
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Conditioning, Operant, Female, Hand, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Male, Motor Cortex, Movement, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review