Cited by 78Multisensory perception and integrationVisual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Multisensory enhancement of attentional capture in visual search

Open access
Matusz, Pawel J., Eimer, Martin·2011·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

Multisensory integration increases the salience of sensory events and, therefore, possibly also their ability to capture attention in visual search. This was investigated in two experiments where spatially uninformative color change cues preceded visual search arrays with color-defined targets. Tones were presented synchronously with these cues on half of all trials. Spatial-cuing effects indicative of cue-triggered capture of attention were larger on tone-present than on tone-absent trials, demonstrating multisensory enhancements of attentional capture. Larger capture effects for audiovisual events were found when cues were color singletons, and also when they appeared among heterogeneous color distractors. Tone-induced increases of attentional capture were independent of color-specific top-down task sets, suggesting that this multisensory effect is a stimulus-driven bottom-up phenomenon.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13423-011-0131-8

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matusz, P. J., & Eimer, M.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2011-07-12
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
904-909
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2084651734
Cited by
78
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
multisensory integration, attentional capture, visual search, audiovisual cues, spatial cueing, bottom-up attention, color singleton
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Attention, Color Perception, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Pupil Disorders, Visual Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review