Cited by 892Multisensory perception and integrationVisual perception and processing mechanismsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Anatomical evidence of multimodal integration in primate striate cortex

Open access
Falchier, Arnaud, Clavagnier, Simon, Barone, Pascal, Kennedy, Henry·2002·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The primary visual cortex (area 17 or V1) is not thought to receive input from nonvisual extrastriate cortical areas. However, this has yet to be shown to be the case using sensitive tracers in the part of area 17 subserving the peripheral visual field. Here we show using retrograde tracers that peripheral area 17 subserving the visual field at an eccentricity of 10-20 degrees receives projections from the core and parabelt areas of the auditory cortex as well as from the polysensory area of the temporal lobe (STP). The relative strength of these projections was calculated for each injection by computing the proportions of retrogradely labeled neurons located in the auditory and STP areas with respect to number of labeled neurons constituting the established projection from the superior temporal sulci (STS) motion complex (middle temporal area, medial superior temporal, fundus of the superior temporal area). In peripheral area V1 the projection from auditory cortex corresponds to 9.5% of that of the STS motion complex and STP to 35% of that from the STS motion complex. Compared to peripheral area 17, central and paracentral area 17 showed considerably weaker inputs from auditory cortex (0.2-0.8%) but slightly more from STP cortex (3.5-6.1%). The present results show that the connectivity of area 17 is eccentricity dependent. Direct projections from auditory and STP cortex to peripheral area 17 have important consequences for higher visual functions of area 17, including multimodal integration at early stages of the visual cortical pathway.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.22-13-05749.2002

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Internal heterogeneity in connectivity patterns is well documented for the peripheral versus central representations of V1, V2, and V4 and for the body representation of F2.

    “This is well documented for the peripheral versus central representations of V1, V2, and V4 (Falchier et al. 2002) and the body representation of F2 (Johnson et al. 1996; Matelli et al. 1998; Tanne-Gariepy et al. 2002; Luppino et al. 2003).”

    From A Weighted and Directed Interareal Connectivity Matrix for Macaque Cerebral Cortex (2014) · cites this paper as Falchier et al. 2002

  • Many cortical areas show major internal heterogeneity in their connectivity patterns that exceeds the variability reported here for repeat injections localized to a particular areal subregion.

    “Many cortical areas show major internal heterogeneity in their connectivity patterns that exceeds the variability reported here for repeat injections that were localized to a particular areal subregion.”

    From A Weighted and Directed Interareal Connectivity Matrix for Macaque Cerebral Cortex (2014) · cites this paper as Falchier et al. 2002

  • Subsequent studies have revealed numerous connections between functional systems, for example, between early auditory and visual areas.

    “However, subsequent studies have revealed numerous connections between functional systems, for example, between early auditory and visual areas (Falchier et al. 2002).”

    From A Weighted and Directed Interareal Connectivity Matrix for Macaque Cerebral Cortex (2014) · cites this paper as Falchier et al. 2002

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falchier, A., Clavagnier, S., Barone, P., & Kennedy, H.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2002-07-01
Volume
22
Issue
13
Pages
5749-5759
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2134188685
Cited by
892
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 53
FWCI
34.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
primary visual cortex, area 17, multimodal integration, extrastriate cortex, retrograde tracing, primate visual cortex, auditory-visual interaction
MeSH terms
Animals, Auditory Cortex, Coloring Agents, Injections, Macaca fascicularis, Neurons, Species Specificity, Temporal Lobe, Visual Cortex, Visual Fields, Visual Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review