Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses.

McCloskey, Michael, Zaragoza, Maria·1985·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

The claim that a person's memory for an event may be altered by information encountered after the event has been influential in shaping current conceptions of memory. The basis for the claim is a series of studies showing that subjects who are given false or misleading information about a previously witnessed event perform more poorly on tests of memory for the event than subjects who are not misled. In this article we argue that the available evidence does not imply that misleading postevent information impairs memory for the original event, because the procedure used in previous studies is inappropriate for assessing effects of misleading information on memory. We then introduce a more appropriate procedure and report six experiments using this procedure. We conclude from the results that misleading postevent information has no effect on memory for the original event. We then review several recent studies that seem to contradict this conclusion, showing that the studies do not pose problems for our position. Finally, we discuss the implications of our conclusions for broader issues concerning memory.

Cites (2)

  1. Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory
    Loftus, Elizabeth F., Palmer, John C. · 1974 · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
  2. Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory
    Loftus, Elizabeth F., Miller, David G., Burns, Helen J. · 1978 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory

Show all 2 references

Cited by (24)

  1. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.
    Roediger, Henry L., McDermott, Kathleen B. · 1995 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
  2. Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory: Figure 1.
    Loftus, Elizabeth F. · 2005 · Learning & Memory
  3. The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience.
    Schacter, Daniel L. · 1999 · American Psychologist
  4. The formation of false memories
    Loftus, Elizabeth F, Pickrell, Jacqueline E · 1995 · Psychiatric Annals
  5. Attachment Stability From Infancy to Adulthood: Meta-Analysis and Dynamic Modeling of Developmental Mechanisms
    Chris Fraley, R. · 2002 · Personality and Social Psychology Review

See all 675

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-3445.114.1.1
The paper
McCloskey, M., & Zaragoza, M. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.114.1.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.