The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test.
Abstract
According to construal level theory (N. Liberman, Y. Trope, & E. Stephan, in press; Y. Trope & N. Liberman, 2003), people use a more abstract, high construal level when judging, perceiving, and predicting more psychologically distal targets, and they judge more abstract targets as being more psychologically distal. The present research demonstrated that associations between more distance and higher level of construal also exist on a pure conceptual level. Eight experiments used the Implicit Association Test (IAT; A. G. Greenwald, D. E. McGhee, & J. L. K. Schwartz, 1998) to demonstrate an association between words related to construal level (low vs. high) and words related to four dimensions of distance (proximal vs. distal): temporal distance, spatial distance, social distance, and hypotheticality. In addition to demonstrating an association between level of construal and psychological distance, these findings also corroborate the assumption that all 4 dimensions of psychological distance are related to level of construal in a similar way and support the notion that they all are forms of psychological distance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Point of view in personal memories
Nigro, G., & Neisser, U. (1983) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90016-6 · Cited by 827
The Pros and Cons of Temporally Near and Distant Action.
Eyal, T., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Walther, E. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.781 · Cited by 333
Self-citation
Cited by
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0018963 · Cited by 6,618
Self-citationTrope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/s1057-7408(07)70013-x · Cited by 1,772
Self-citationThe Future is Now: Reducing Psychological Distance to Increase Public Engagement with Climate Change
Jones, C., Hine, D. W., & Marks, A. D. G. (2017) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12601 · Cited by 507
Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance
Tan, H. S. G., Fischer, A. R. H., Tinchan, P., Stieger, M., Steenbekkers, L. P. A., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.013 · Cited by 500
Choi, H.-H., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2014) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9262-6 · Cited by 413
Metadata
- Authors
- Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 609-622
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2134081076
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
